Aggregation behaviour of TiO2 nanoparticles in natural river water
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine and understand the aggregation behaviour of industrial nanoparticulate TiO2 (NPs) in the river water near a TiO2 production plant. The aggregation was tested in near-reality conditions with industrial NPs and the filtered river water in which they are potentially released. The initial size of TiO2 NPs is around 5 nm. The evolution of the hydrodynamic diameters of the TiO2 aggregates in the presence of added Suwannee River fulvic acid (SRFA) and illite in the filtered river water was measured at pH 8 for at least 30 min with dynamic light scattering and laser diffraction. The experiments performed in the filtered river water allowed the determination of the attachment efficiency coefficients, and the experiments performed under conditions facilitating aggregation (with higher Ca2+ content) were used to understand the potential aggregation processes. When no Ca2+ was added into the river water, the initially aggregated TiO2 did not develop a secondary aggregation in the presence of SRFA and illite. Upon the addition of 2.75 mM Ca2+, TiO2 was shown to heteroaggregate with illite at all tested concentrations. Consequently, in the studied river, the fate of the TiO2 NPs does not seem to be related to that of the clay suspended particles upstream of the plant. However, the behaviours of the TiO2 NPs and the clays are closely linked in the water with higher salt content, which is the case downstream of one of the industrial effluent release points.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Adam V, Loyaux-Lawniczak S, Quaranta G (2015) Characterization of engineered TiO2 nanomaterials in a life cycle and risk assessments perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 105:731–738
2. AERM (Agence de l’Eau Rhin Meuse) (2013). http://rhin-meuse.eaufrance.fr/choixtheme?lang=fr . Accessed 10 June 2015
3. Benlot C, Blanchouin N (2005). www.snv.jussieu.fr/bmedia/aa/aa1.html . Accessed June 2015
4. Bouyer D, Coufort C (2005) Experimental analysis of floc size distributions in a 1-L jar under different hydrodynamics and physicochemical conditions. J Colloid Interface Sci 292:413–42810.1016/j.jcis.2005.06.011 ↗
5. Chowdhury I, Walker SL, Mylon SE (2013) Aggregate morphology of nano-TiO2: role of primary particle size, solution chemistry, and organic matter. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15:275. doi: 10.1039/c2em30680h10.1039/C2EM30680H ↗
6. Domingos RF, Tufenkji N, Wilkinson KJ (2009) Aggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: role of a fulvic acid. Environ Sci Technol 43:1282–1286. doi: 10.1021/es802359410.1021/es8023594 ↗
7. Elimelech M, Gregory J, Jia X, Williams RA (1995) Particle deposition & aggregation: measurement, modelling and simulation. Elsevier, New York. ISBN 978-0-7506-0743-8
8. Erhayem M, Sohn M (2014) Stability studies for titanium dioxide nanoparticles upon adsorption of Suwannee River humic and fulvic acids and natural organic matter. Sci Total Environ 468–469:249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.03810.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.038 ↗
9. Johnston BD, Scown TM, Moger J (2010) Bioavailability of nanoscale metal oxides TiO2, CeO2, and ZnO to fish. Environ Sci Technol 44:1144–115110.1021/es901971a ↗
10. Keller AA, Wang H, Zhou D (2010) Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ Sci Technol 44:1962–1967. doi: 10.1021/es902987d10.1021/es902987d ↗
11. Labille J, Harns C, Bottero J-Y, Brant J (2015) Heteroaggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with natural clay colloids. Environ Sci Technol. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00357
12. Liu HH, Cohen Y (2014) Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 48:3281–3292. doi: 10.1021/es405132z10.1021/es405132z ↗
13. Meesters JAJ, Koelmans AA, Quik JTK (2014) Multimedia modeling of engineered nanoparticles with simpleBox4nano: model definition and evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 48:5726–5736. doi: 10.1021/es500548h10.1021/es500548h ↗
14. Ottofuelling S, Von Der Kammer F, Hofmann T (2011) Commercial titanium dioxide nanoparticles in both natural and synthetic water: comprehensive multidimensional testing and prediction of aggregation behaviour. Environ Sci Technol 45:10045–10052. doi: 10.1021/es202322510.1021/es2023225 ↗
15. Petosa AR, Jaisi DP, Quevedo IR (2010) Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions. Environ Sci Technol 44:6532–6549. doi: 10.1021/es100598h10.1021/es100598h ↗
16. Piccinno F, Gottschalk F, Seeger S, Nowack B (2012) Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J Nanoparticle Res 14:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-1109-910.1007/s11051-012-1109-9 ↗
17. Praetorius A, Scheringer M, Hungerbühler K (2012) Development of environmental fate models for engineered nanoparticles—a case study of TiO2 nanoparticles in the Rhine River. Environ Sci Technol 46:6705–6713. doi: 10.1021/es204530n10.1021/es204530n ↗
18. Praetorius A, Labille J, Scheringer M (2014) Heteroaggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with model natural colloids under environmentally relevant conditions. Environ Sci Technol. doi: 10.1021/es501655v
19. Richie JD, Perdue EM (2003) Proton-binding study of standard and reference fulvic acids, humic acids, and natural organic matter. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:85–9610.1016/S0016-7037(02)01044-X ↗
20. Sani-Kast N, Scheringer M, Slomberg D (2015) Addressing the complexity of water chemistry in environmental fate modeling for engineered nanoparticles. Sci Total Environ 535:150–159. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.02510.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.025 ↗
21. Sillanpää M, Paunu T-M, Sainio P (2011) Aggregation and deposition of engineered TiO2 nanoparticles in natural fresh and brackish waters. J Phys: Conf Ser 304:012018. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/304/1/012018
22. Therezien M, Thill A, Wiesner MR (2014) Importance of heterogeneous aggregation for NP fate in natural and engineered systems. Sci Total Environ 485–486:309–318. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.02010.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.020 ↗
23. Thill A, Moustier S, Aziz J (2001) Flocs restructuring during aggregation: experimental evidence and numerical simulation. J Colloid Interface Sci 243:171–18210.1006/jcis.2001.7801 ↗
24. Wang H, Dong Y, Zhu M (2015) Heteroaggregation of engineered nanoparticles and kaolin clays in aqueous environments. Water Res 80:130–138. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.02310.1016/j.watres.2015.05.023 ↗
25. Wilkinson KJ, Lead JR (2006) Environmental colloids and particles: behaviour, separation and characterisation, volume 10. Wiley, Chichester10.1002/9780470024539 ↗
26. Zhang W, Crittenden J, Li K, Chen Y (2012) Attachment efficiency of nanoparticle aggregation in aqueous dispersions: modeling and experimental validation. Environ Sci Technol 46:7054–7062. doi: 10.1021/es203623z10.1021/es203623z ↗
27. Zhou D, Abdel-Fattah AI, Keller AA (2012) Clay particles destabilize engineered nanoparticles in aqueous environments. Environ Sci Technol 46:7520–7526. doi: 10.1021/es300442710.1021/es3004427 ↗
28. Zhou D, Ji Z, Jiang X (2013) Influence of material properties on TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration. PLoS One 8:e81239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.008123910.1371/journal.pone.0081239 ↗
29. Zhu M, Wang H, Keller AA (2014) The effect of humic acid on the aggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles under different pH and ionic strengths. Sci Total Environ 487:375–380. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.03610.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.036 ↗