Graphene enterprise: mapping innovation and business development in a strategic emerging technology
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper explores enterprise development and commercialization in the field of graphene. Firm characteristics and relationships, value chain positioning, and factors associated with product entry are examined for a set of 65 graphene-oriented small and medium-sized enterprises located in 16 different countries. As well as secondary sources and bibliometric methods to profile developments in graphene, we use computerized data mining and analytical techniques, including cluster and regression modeling, to identify patterns from publicly available online information on enterprise web sites. We identify groups of graphene small and medium-sized enterprises differentiated by how they are involved with graphene, the materials they target, whether they make equipment, and their orientation toward science and intellectual property. In general, access to finance and the firms' location are significant factors that are associated with graphene product introductions. We also find that patents and scientific publications are not statistically significant predictors of product development in our sample of graphene enterprises. We further identify a cohort of graphene-oriented firms that are signaling plans to develop intermediate graphene products that should have higher value in the marketplace. Our findings suggest that policy needs to ensure attention to the introduction and scale-up of downstream intermediate and final graphene products and associated financial, intermediary, and market identification support. The paper demonstrates novel data methods that can be combined with existing information for real-time intelligence to understand and map enterprise development and commercialization in a rapidly emerging and growing new technology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models · Intellectual Property and Patents
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Akerman SJ (ed) (1999) Are small firms important: their role and impact?. Springer, New York
2. Alcalde H, Fuente JDL, Kamp B, Zurutuza A (2013) Market uptake potential of graphene as a disruptive material. Proc IEEE 101:1793–1800. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2013.226311210.1109/JPROC.2013.2263112 ↗
3. Alencar MSM, Porter AL, Antunes AMS (2007) Nanopatenting patterns in relation to product life cycle. Technol Forecast Soc 74:1661–1680. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.04.00210.1016/j.techfore.2007.04.002 ↗
4. Arora SK, Youtie J, Shapira P, Gao L, Ma TT (2013) Entry strategies in an emerging technology: a pilot web-based study of graphene firms. Scientometrics 95:1189–1207. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-0950-710.1007/s11192-013-0950-7 ↗
5. Arora SK, Youtie J, Shapira P, Li Y (2015) Using the wayback machine to mine websites in the social sciences: a methodological resource. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol (forthcoming). doi: 10.1002/asi.2350310.1002/asi.23503 ↗
6. Baglieri D, Cesaroni F, Orsi L (2014) Does the nano-patent ‘Gold rush’ lead to entrepreneurial-driven growth? Some policy lessons from China and Japan. Technovation 34:746–761. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.00910.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.009 ↗
7. BIS (2011) Innovation and research strategy for growth. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32450/11-1387-innovation-and-research-strategy-for-growth.pdf
8. Chen Y-B, Liu JS, Lin P (2013) Recent trend in graphene for optoelectronics. J Nanopart Res 15:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-1454-310.1007/s11051-013-1454-3 ↗
9. Colapinto J (2014) Material question: graphene may be the most remarkable substance ever discovered. But what’s it for? The New Yorker, December 22. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/12/22/material-question
10. Dedehayir O, Steinert M (2016) The hype cycle model: a review and future directions. Technol Forecast Soc 108:28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.00510.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.005 ↗
11. DFG (2011) Priority programme on graphene [Online]. Deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation). http://www.spp1459.uni-erlangen.de/about-spp-1459/ . Accessed 16 March 2015
12. European Commission (2013) The graphene flagship [Online]. http://graphene-flagship.eu/?page_id=5 . Accessed 16 March 2015
13. Future Markets Inc (2012) The world market for graphene 2010–2017
14. Future Markets Inc (2015) The global market for graphene to 2025: Market size, production volumes, applications, products, prospects, research and companies
15. Gök A, Waterworth A, Shapira P (2015) Use of web mining in studying innovation. Scientometrics 102:653–671. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1434-010.1007/s11192-014-1434-0 ↗
16. Gomila JMV, Marro FP (2013) Combining tech-mining and semantic-TRIZ for a faster and better technology analysis: a case in energy storage systems. Technol Anal Strateg 25:725–743. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.80306510.1080/09537325.2013.803065 ↗
17. Graphene Tracker (2015) Directory. http://www.graphenetracker.com/companies/ Accessed 2 April 2015
18. Graphenea (2014) Graphene market overview. Presentation to Ascamm Technology Centre (October). http://www.forumascamm.com/f14/ca/ponencies/graphenea.pdf . Accessed 31 March 2015
19. Hill R (2013) Sweden takes centre stage as Europe launches into graphene research [Online]. http://www.researchresearch.com/index.php?option=com_news&template=rr_2col&view=article&articleId=1338729 . Accessed 16 March 2015
20. IDTechEX (2012) Graphene analysis of technology, Markets and players 2013–2018
21. IDTechEX (2014) Graphene markets, technologies and opportunities 2014–2024
22. IPO (2013) Graphene—The worldwide patent landscape in 2013. Intellectual Property Office, Newport
23. IPO (2015) Graphene—The worldwide patent landscape in 2013. Intellectual Property Office, Newport
24. ITV (2014) Cambridge scientists perfect way to mass produce wonder substance graphene. ITV News, October 16. http://www.itv.com/news/anglia/2014-10-16/cambridge-scientists-perfect-way-to-mass-produce-wonder-substance-graphene/ . Accessed 30 March 2015
25. Li Y, Arora S, Youtie J, Shapira P (2016) Using web mining to explore Triple Helix influences on growth in small and mid-size firms. Technovation. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.01.00210.1016/j.technovation.2016.01.002 ↗
26. Liu B (2011) Web data mining: exploring hyperlinks, contents, and usage data (data-centric systems and applications), 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-642-19460-3 ↗
27. Materials Genome Initiative (2014) Materials genome initiative strategic plan. The National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC
28. Meyer M (2007) What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Some propositions about an emerging field between hype and path-dependency. Scientometrics 70:779–810. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-0312-410.1007/s11192-007-0312-4 ↗
29. Moessle M, Kurz H (2011) Priority programme graphene. The German Research Foundation (DFG)
30. NanoMalaysia (2015) National graphene action plan 2020 [Online]. http://www.nanomalaysia.com.my/img/ngap/NGAP_2020_Booklet.pdf . Accessed 16 March 2015
31. National Nanotechnology Initiative (2014) Supplement to the President’s 2015 budget. The National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC
32. Novoselov KS, Fal’ko VI, Colombo L, Gellert PR, Schwab MG, Kim K (2012) A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490:192–200. doi: 10.1038/nature1145810.1038/nature11458 ↗
33. Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New York
34. Porter ME (2001) The value chain and competitive advantage. In: Barnes DW (ed) Understanding business: processes. Routledge, London
35. Research Lux (2007) The nanotech report: investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. Lux Research, New York
36. Rietsch C, Beaudry C, Héroux-Vaillancourt M (2016) Validation of a web mining technique to measure innovation in the Canadian nanotechnology-related community. CARMA 2016–1st International Conference on Advanced Research Methods and Analytics. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/CARMA2016.2016.314010.4995/CARMA2016.2016.3140 ↗
37. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (2010) Graphene. Scientific background on the nobel prize in physics 2010. Compiled by the class for physics of the royal swedish academy of sciences, Stockholm, October 5. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2010/advanced-physicsprize2010.pdf
38. Saltarin A (2014) Graphene mass production now possible, says Irish scientists. Tech Times, April 22. http://www.techtimes.com/articles/5859/20140422/graphene-mass-production-now-possible-says-irish-scientists-what-does-this-mean-for-the-technology-industry.htm . Accessed 30 March 2015
39. Shapira P, Youtie J, Arora S (2012) Early patterns of commercial activity in graphene. J Nanopart Res 14:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-0811-y10.1007/s11051-012-0811-y ↗
40. Sivudu S, Mahajan Y (2012) Mass production of high quality graphene: An analysis of worldwide patents, Centre for Knowledge Management of Nanoscience and Technology, Nanowerk, June 28. http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=25744.php . Accessed 31 March 2015
41. Small H, Boyack KW, Klavan R (2014) Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Res Policy 43:1450–1467. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.00510.1016/j.respol.2014.02.005 ↗
42. University Of Manchester (2014) New £60 m Engineering Innovation Centre to be based in Manchester [Online]. http://www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/news/article/?id=12777 . Accessed 16 March 2015
43. van Lente H, Spitters C, Peine A (2013) Comparing technological hype cycles: towards a theory. Technol Forecast Soc 80:1615–1628. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.00410.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.004 ↗
44. Wang G, Guan J (2012) Value chain of nanotechnology: a comparative study of some major players. J Nanopart Res 14:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0702-710.1007/s11051-011-0702-7 ↗
45. Warner JH, Schäffel F, Bachmatiuk A, Rümmeli M (2013) Graphene: fundamentals and emergent applications. Elsevier, Oxford
46. Wei D, Kivioja J (2013) Graphene for energy solutions and its industrialization. Nanoscale 5:10108–10126. doi: 10.1039/C3NR03312K10.1039/C3NR03312K ↗
47. Wenz J (2015) This scientist invented a simple way to mass-produce graphene. Popular mechanics, March 20. http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a14651/this-scientist-invented-a-simply-way-to-mass-produce-graphene/ . Accessed 30 March 2015
48. Youtie J, Hicks D, Shapira P, Horsley T (2012) Pathways from discovery to commercialization: using web sources to track small and medium-sized enterprise strategies in emerging nanotechnologies. Technol Anal Strateg 24:981–995. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.72416310.1080/09537325.2012.724163 ↗