DataVXJournal of Nanoparticle ResearchPaper
journal article·2016-07

Science and technology convergence: with emphasis for nanotechnology-inspired convergence

William S. Bainbridge, Mihail C. Roco

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 18· Issue 7
Publisher page
Source abstract

Abstract

Convergence offers a new universe of discovery, innovation, and application opportunities through specific theories, principles, and methods to be implemented in research, education, production, and other societal activities. Using a holistic approach with shared goals, convergence seeks to transcend existing human limitations to achieve improved conditions for work, learning, aging, physical, and cognitive wellness. This paper outlines ten key theories that offer complementary perspectives on this complex dynamic. Principles and methods are proposed to facilitate and enhance science and technology convergence. Several convergence success stories in the first part of the 21st century—including nanotechnology and other emerging technologies—are discussed in parallel with case studies focused on the future. The formulation of relevant theories, principles, and methods aims at establishing the convergence science.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

Nanomaterials

OpenAlex topics: Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Abbott BP (2016) Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys Rev Lett 116(6):06110210.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 ↗
2. Barone J et al (2015) Nanocrafter: design and evaluation of a DNA nanotechnology game. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on the foundations of digital games, Pacific Grove, CA
3. Buehler E et al (2015) Sharing is caring: assistive technology designs on Thingiverse. In: Proceedings of CHI 2015. ACM, New York, pp 525–53410.1145/2702123.2702525 ↗
4. Allaby M, Lovelock J (1984) The greening of Mars. St. Martin’s, New York
5. Ansip A (2016) A bright digital future for all: global cooperation to make the best of the digital economy (OECD’s Ministerial Meeting on the Digital Economy). European Community, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/2014-2019/ansip/blog/bright-digital-future-all-global-cooperation-make-best-digital-economy-oecds-ministerial-meeting_en
6. Atkeson A, Kehoe PJ (2007) Modeling the transition to a new economy: lessons from two technological revolutions. Am Econ Rev 97(10):64–8810.1257/aer.97.1.64 ↗
7. Bae SH, Lim JS, Shin KM, Kim CW, Kang SK, Shin M (2013) The innovation policy of nanotechnology development and convergence for the new Korean government. J. Nanoparticle Res 15:207210.1007/s11051-013-2072-9 ↗
8. Bain AD (1963) The growth of demand for new commodities. J R Stat Soc 126(2):285–299
9. Bainbridge WS (2004) The evolution of semantic systems. In: Montemagno CD, Roco MC, Carlo D (eds) The coevolution of human potential and converging technologies. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp 150–177
10. Bainbridge WS (2006) Transformative concepts in scientific convergence. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Progress in convergence: technologies for human wellbeing. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp 24–45
11. Bainbridge WS (2016a) Dimensions of research. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 125–13810.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_4 ↗
12. Bainbridge WS (2016b) Science and technology globalization. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 621–63410.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_44 ↗
13. Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) (2006a) Managing Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno innovations: converging technologies in society. Springer, Berlin
14. Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) (2006b) Progress in convergence: technologies for human wellbeing. New York Academy of Sciences, New York
15. Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) (2016) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin
16. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2011) Race against the machine. Digital Frontier Press, Lexington
17. Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Sociol 110:349–39910.1086/421787 ↗
18. Chen HS, Roco MC (2009) Mapping nanotechnology innovations and knowledge: global and longitudinal patent and literature analysis. Springer, Berlin
19. Choi H-J, Montemagno C (2016) Convergence of nanotechnology and biotechnology. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 253–27810.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_65 ↗
20. Ciao J et al (2013) Implications: societal collective outcomes, including manufacturing. In: Roco MC, Bainbridge WS, Tonn B, Whitesides G (eds) Convergence of knowledge, technology and society. Springer, New York, pp 255–285
21. Cobb MD (2011) Creating informed public opinion: citizen deliberation about nanotechnologies for human enhancements. J Nanopart Res 13:1533–154810.1007/s11051-011-0227-0 ↗
22. Cooke NJ, Hilton ML (eds) (2015) Enhancing the effectiveness of team science. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
23. Córdova FA (2016) 10 big ideas for future NSF investments. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, www.nsf.gov/about/congress/reports/nsf_big_ideas.pdf
24. Crowston K (2016) Open source technology development. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 475–48610.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_29 ↗
25. D’Agostino G, Scala A (2016) Systemic interdependencies. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 181–19410.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_14 ↗
26. dos Reis C et al (2015) Crowdsourcing the general public for large scale molecular pathology studies in cancer. EBioMedicine 2:681–68910.1016/j.ebiom.2015.05.009 ↗
27. Elsby MWL, Hobijn B, Şahin A (2013) The decline of the U.S. labor share. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:1–5210.1353/eca.2013.0016 ↗
28. Evans JH, Evans MS (2008) Religion and science: beyond the epistemological conflict narrative. Ann Rev Sociol 34:87–10510.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134702 ↗
29. Evans DS, Gawer A (2016) The rise of the platform enterprise: a global survey. The Center for Global Enterprise, New York, NY, http://thecge.net/archived-papers/the-rise-of-the-platform-enterprise-a-global-survey/ . Accessed date on Jan 2016
30. Fisher D (2016) Online courses. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 1105–111810.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_60 ↗
31. Fountain JE (2016) Digital government. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 781–79410.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_51 ↗
32. Frey CB, Osborne MA (2013) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerization?. Oxford Martin, Programme on the Impacts of Future Technology, Oxford
33. Galesik M, Barkoczi D, Katsikopoulos K (2016) Smaller crowds outperform larger crowds and individuals in realistic task conditions. Decis Am Psychol Asso. doi: 10.1037/dec000005910.1037/dec0000059 ↗
34. Gibbon E (1776–1788) The history of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Seven volumes. Methuin [1896], London
35. Gimzewski JK, Stieg AZ, Vesna V (2016) Self-organization and emergence of dynamic systems. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 163–18010.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_74 ↗
36. Glenn JC (2016) Collective intelligence systems. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–6410.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_7 ↗
37. Gordon RJ (2016) The rise and fall of American growth: the U.S. standard of living since the Civil War. Princeton University Press, Princeton10.1515/9781400873302 ↗
38. Government Accountability Office (2014) GAO-14-181SP report on nanotechnology to U.S. Congress. Government Accountability Office, Washington, D.C
39. Granovetter MS (2005) The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J Econ Perspect 19:33–5010.1257/0895330053147958 ↗
40. Holland JH (2006) Studying complex adaptive systems. J Syst Sci Complexity 19(1):1–810.1007/s11424-006-0001-z ↗
41. Hong J, Lambson B, Dhuey S, Bokor J (2016) Experimental test of Landauer’s principle in single-bit operations on nanomagnetic memory bits. Sci Adv. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.150149210.1126/sciadv.1501492 ↗
42. Horgan J (1996) The end of science. Addison-Wesley, Reading
43. Hughes TP (1983) Networks of power: electrification in Western society, 1880–1930. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore10.56021/9780801828737 ↗
44. Jevons HS (1931) The second industrial revolution. Econ J 41(161):1–1810.2307/2224131 ↗
45. Khatib F et al (2011) Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18:1175–117710.1038/nsmb.2119 ↗
46. Kleinman DL, Delborne JA, Anderson AA (2009) Engaging citizens: the high cost of citizen participation in high technology. Public Underst Sci 1:1–20
47. Klimeck G, McLennan M, Brophy S, Adams III G, Lundstrom M (2008) nanoHUB.org: advancing education and research in nanotechnology. IEEE Comput Eng Sci (CISE). doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2008.12010.1109/MCSE.2008.120 ↗
48. Kolodner J (2016) Cyberlearning. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 1007–102210.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_56 ↗
49. Kristal T (2013) The Capitalist machine: computerization, workers’ power, and the decline in labor’s share within U.S. industries. Am Sociol Rev 78(3):361–38910.1177/0003122413481351 ↗
50. Kuhn TS (1957) The Copernican revolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
51. Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
52. Kurzweil R (1999) The age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence. Viking/Penguin Group, New York
53. Landauer R (1961) Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM J V(x):183–19110.1147/rd.53.0183 ↗
54. Launius RD (2016) Space exploration. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 635–65010.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_39 ↗
55. Lesk M (2016) The convergence of curation. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–11210.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_83 ↗
56. Levin SA (2005) Self-organization and the emergence of complexity in ecological systems. Bioscience 55(12):1075–107910.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[1075:SATEOC]2.0.CO;2 ↗
57. Lindtner S (2014) Hackerspaces and the internet of things in China: how makers are reinventing industrial production, innovation, and the self. China Inf 28(2):145–16710.1177/0920203X14529881 ↗
58. Linkov I, Gisladottir V, Wood MD (2016) Decision making in a convergent society. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 113–12410.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_73 ↗
59. Lintott C et al (2011) Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900 000 galaxies. Mon Not R Astron Soc 410(1):166–17810.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17432.x ↗
60. Lipscomb D (1995) Women in systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26:323–34110.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.001543 ↗
61. Lovelock JE, Margulis L (1974) Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: the Gaia hypothesis. Tellus 26(1–2):2–1010.1111/j.2153-3490.1974.tb01946.x ↗
62. Lux Research (2015) Update to 2014 research effort concerning nanotechnology R&D spending, revenues and related information. New York, October 2015
63. Madhavan K, Zentner M, Klimeck G (2013) Learning and research in the cloud. Nat Nanotechnol 8:786–789. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.23110.1038/nnano.2013.231 ↗
64. Markus ML, Topi H (2015) Big data, big decisions for science, society, and business. ACM Digital Library, New York
65. Mason RM (2016) Institutional transformation. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 847–86010.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_53 ↗
66. Massey DS (2002) A brief history of human society: the origin and role of emotion in social life: 2001 presidential address. Am Sociol Rev 67(1):1–2910.2307/3088931 ↗
67. McCoy VE et al (2016) The “Tully monster” is a vertebrate. Nature 532:496–49910.1038/nature16992 ↗
68. Meade N, Islam T (1998) Technological forecasting—model selection, model stability, and combining models. Manag Sci 44(8):1115–113010.1287/mnsc.44.8.1115 ↗
69. Merton RK (1970) Science, technology and society in seventeenth-century England. Harper and Row, New York
70. Mervis J (2016) NSF director unveils big ideas. Science 352(6287):755–75610.1126/science.352.6287.755 ↗
71. Murday J (2016) Norms and standards of learning. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 1089–110410.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_67 ↗
72. National Research Council (2014) Convergence: facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond. National Academies Press, Washington DC
73. Nef JU (1943) The industrial revolution reconsidered. J Econ Hist 3(1):1–3110.1017/S002205070008236X ↗
74. Oden TJ (2016) Modeling and simulation. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 139–14810.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_8 ↗
75. OECD (2015) Biotechnology, nanotechnology and other converging technologies working group, Paris, France. www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/oecd-working-party-bio-nano-and-converging-tech-bnct-0
76. Ogburn WF (1922) Social change with respect to culture and original nature. Huebsch, New York
77. Olds J (2016) Cognitive technology. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 227–23810.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_18 ↗
78. Oliva A, Teng S (2016) Cognitive society. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 743–75410.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_48 ↗
79. Olson GM (2016) Collaboratories. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 391–40010.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_34 ↗
80. OSTP (March 29 2012) Big data research and development initiative. Washington, www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/big_data_press_release_final_2.pdf
81. Pass J, Harrison AA (2016) Astrosociology. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 545–55810.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_79 ↗
82. Peck JC (2016) Bio-cognitive evolution. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 43–5210.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_6 ↗
83. Poole E, Bernard J-T (1992) Defense innovation stock and total factor productivity. Can J Econ 25(2):438–45210.2307/135873 ↗
84. Porter JH et al (2009) New eyes on the world: advanced sensors for ecology. Bioscience 59(5):385–39710.1525/bio.2009.59.5.6 ↗
85. Powell WW, Snellman K (2004) The knowledge economy. Ann Rev Sociol 30:199–22010.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037 ↗
86. Rejeski D, Pauwels E, Koo J (2016) Science and technology forecasting. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–16210.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_13 ↗
87. Roco MC (2002) Coherence and divergence of megatrends in science and engineering. J Nanopart Res 4:9–1910.1023/A:1020157027792 ↗
88. Roco MC (2008) Possibilities for global governance of converging technologies. J Nanopart Res 10:11–2910.1007/s11051-007-9269-8 ↗
89. Roco MC (2011) The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology initiative at 10 years. J Nanopar Res 13:427–44510.1007/s11051-010-0192-z ↗
90. Roco MC (2016a) Principles and methods that facilitate convergence. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 17–4210.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_2 ↗
91. Roco MC (2016b) Convergence-divergence process. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 79–9410.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_11 ↗
92. Roco MC (2016c) NBIC. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer, Berlin, pp 209–22610.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_16 ↗
93. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2001) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. In: Kluwer, Dordrecht (Mihail C. Roco and WSB)10.1007/978-94-017-3012-9 ↗
94. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance: integrating from the nanoscale, J Nanoparticle Res 4:281–29510.1023/A:1021152023349 ↗
95. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2003) Converging technologies for improving human performance. Kluwer, Dordrecht
96. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2006a) Nanotechnology: societal implications–maximizing benefit for humanity. Springer, Berlin, (Mihail C. Roco and WSB)10.1007/978-1-4020-5432-7 ↗
97. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2006b) Nanotechnology: societal implications–individual perspectives. Springer, Berlin, (Mihail C. Roco and WSB)10.1007/978-1-4020-5432-7 ↗
98. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2013) The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: convergence of knowledge, technology, and society. J Nanopart Res 15(1946):17
99. Roco MC, Montemagno CD (eds) (2004) The coevolution of human potential and converging technologies. New York Academy of Sciences, New York
100. Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P (eds) (2000) Nanotechnology research directions: vision for the next decade. National Science and Technology Council, Washington, DC, http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/IWGN.Research.Directions/ ). Kluwer Academic Publ. (now Springer), Dordrecht