journal article·2014-11

Characterization and anti-tumor effects of chondroitin sulfate–chitosan nanoparticles delivery system

Chieh-Shen Hu, Sung-Ling Tang, Chiao-Hsi Chiang, Hossein Hosseinkhani, Po-Da Hong, Ming-Kung Yeh

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 16· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

We prepared chondroitin sulfate (ChS)–chitosan (CS) nanoparticles (NPs) as a delivery carrier, and doxorubicin (Dox) was used as a model drug. The physicochemical properties and biological activities of the Dox–ChS–CS NPs including the release profile, cell cytotoxicity, cellular internalization, and in vivo anti-tumor effects were evaluated. The ChS–CS NPs and Dox–ChS–CS NPs had a mean size of 262.0 ± 15.0 and 369.4 ± 77.4 nm, and a zeta potential of 30.2 ± 0.9 and 20.6 ± 3.1 mV, respectively. In vitro release tests showed that the 50 % release time for the Dox–ChS–CS NPs was 20 h. Two hepatoma cell models, HepG2 and HuH6, were used for evaluating the cytotoxicity and cell uptake efficiency of the Dox–ChS–CS NPs. A significant difference was observed between doxorubicin solution and the Dox–ChS–CS NPs in the cellular uptake within 60 min (p < 0.01). For the in vivo human xenograft-nude mouse model, the Dox–ChS–CS NPs were more effective with less body weight loss and anti-tumor growth suppression in comparison with the Dox solution. The prepared Dox–ChS–CS NPs offer a new effective targeting nanoparticle delivery system platform for anti-tumor therapy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Alberts AJB, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P (2002) Molecular biology of the cell, garland science. Taylor and Francis Group, NewYork
2. Bei YY, Yuan ZQ, Zhang L, Zhou XF, Chen WL, Xia P, Liu Y, You BG, Hu XJ, Zhu QL, Zhang CG, Zhang XN, Jin Y (2014) Novel self-assembled micelles based on palmitoyl-trimethyl-chitosan for efficient delivery of harmine to liver cancer. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 11(6):843–854 doi: 10.1517/17425247.2014.89329210.1517/17425247.2014.893292 ↗
3. Bilensoy E, Sarisozen C, Esendagli G, Dogan AL, Aktas Y, Sen M, Mungan NA (2009) Intravesical cationic nanoparticles of chitosan and polycaprolactone for the delivery of Mitomycin C to bladder tumors. Int J Pharm 371:170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.12.01510.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.12.015 ↗
4. Brandenberger C, Muhlfeld C, Ali Z, Lenz AG, Schmid O, Parak WJ, Gehr P, Rothen-Rutishauser B (2010) Quantitative evaluation of cellular uptake and trafficking of plain and polyethylene glycol-coated gold nanoparticles. Small 6:1669–1678. doi: 10.1002/smll.20100052810.1002/smll.201000528 ↗
5. Calvo P, Remuñán-López C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ (1997a) Novel hydrophilic chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanoparticles as protein carriers. J Appl Polym Sci 63:125–132. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970103)63:1<125:AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-410.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970103)63:1<125::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
6. Calvo P, Remuñan-López C, Vila-Jato J, Alonso MJ (1997b) Chitosan and chitosan/ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer nanoparticles as novel carriers for proteins and vaccines. Pharm Res 14:1431–1436. doi: 10.1023/A:101212890722510.1023/A:1012128907225 ↗
7. Chang WK, Tai YJ, Chiang CH, Hu CS, Hong PD, Yeh MK (2011) The comparison of protein-entrapped liposomes and lipoparticles: preparation, characterization, and efficacy of cellular uptake. Int J Nanomedicine 6:2403–2417. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S25646
8. Chang ZY, Lu DW, Yeh MK, Chiang CH (2012) A novel high-content flow cytometric method for assessing the viability and damage of rat retinal ganglion cells. PLoS One 7:e33983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.003398310.1371/journal.pone.0033983 ↗
9. Changenet-Barret P, Gustavsson T, Markovitsi D, Manet I, Monti S (2013) Unravelling molecular mechanisms in the fluorescence spectra of doxorubicin in aqueous solution by femtosecond fluorescence spectroscopy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:2937–2944. doi: 10.1039/C2CP44056C10.1039/c2cp44056c ↗
10. Chen H, Wang L, Yeh J, Wu X, Cao Z, Wang YA, Zhang M, Yang L, Mao H (2010) Reducing non-specific binding and uptake of nanoparticles and improving cell targeting with an antifouling PEO-b-PgammaMPS copolymer coating. Biomaterials 31:5397–5407. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.03610.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.036 ↗
11. Chen CW, Lu DW, Yeh MK, Shiau CY, Chiang HC (2011) Novel RGD-lipid conjugate-modified liposomes for enhancing siRNA delivery in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Int J Nanomedicine 6:2567–2580. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S2444710.2147/IJN.S24447 ↗
12. Chiriaco F, Conversano F, Soloperto G, Casciaro E, Ragusa A, Sbenaglia EA, Dipaola L, Casciaro S (2013) Epithelial cell biocompatibility of silica nanospheres for contrast-enhanced ultrasound molecular imaging. J Nanopart Res 15:1779. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-1779-y10.1007/s11051-013-1779-y ↗
13. Clegg DO, Reda DJ, Harris CL, Klein MA, O’Dell JR, Hooper MM, Bradley JD, Bingham CO, Weisman MH, Jackson CG, Lane NE, Cush JJ, Moreland LW, Schumacher HR, Oddis CV, Wolfe F, Molitor JA, Yocum DE, Schnitzer TJ, Furst DE, Sawitzke AD, Shi H, Brandt KD, Moskowitz RW, Williams HJ (2006) Glucosamine, Chondroitin Sulfate, and the Two in Combination for Painful Knee Osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med 354:795–808. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa05277110.1056/NEJMoa052771 ↗
14. Couvreur P, Puisieux F (1993) Nano- and microparticles for the delivery of polypeptides and proteins. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 10:141–162. doi: 10.1016/0169-409x(93)90046-710.1016/0169-409X(93)90046-7 ↗
15. Dash BC, Rethore G, Monaghan M, Fitzgerald K, Gallagher W, Pandit A (2010) The influence of size and charge of chitosan/polyglutamic acid hollow spheres on cellular internalization, viability and blood compatibility. Biomaterials 31:8188–8197. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.06710.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.067 ↗
16. Denuziere AFD, Domard A (1996) Chitosan–chondroitin sulphate and chitosan– hyaluronate polyelectrolyte complexes.: Physico-chemical aspects. Carbohydr Polym. 29(4):317–32310.1016/S0144-8617(96)00035-5 ↗
17. Denuziere AFD, Ferrier D, Damour O, Domard A (1998) Chitosan–chondroitin sulphate and chitosan–hyaluronate polyelectrolyte complexes: biological properties. Biomaterials. 19:1275–128510.1016/S0142-9612(98)00036-2 ↗
18. Elena Udrea L, Hritcu D, Popa MI, Rotariu O (2011) Preparation and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol—chitosan biocompatible magnetic microparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 323:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.06.02510.1016/j.jmmm.2010.06.025 ↗
19. Foster KA, Yazdanian M, Audus KL (2001) Microparticulate uptake mechanisms of in vitro cell culture models of the respiratory epithelium. J Pharm Pharmacol 53:57–6610.1211/0022357011775190 ↗
20. Gewirtz D (1999) A critical evaluation of the mechanisms of action proposed for the antitumor effects of the anthracycline antibiotics adriamycin and daunorubicin. Biochem Pharmacol 57:727–741. doi: 10.1016/S0006-2952(98)00307-410.1016/S0006-2952(98)00307-4 ↗
21. Guo Y, Klein R, Omary RA, Yang GY, Larson AC (2010) Highly malignant intr-hepatic metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma in rats. Am J Transl Res 3:114–120
22. Gupta AK, Gupta M, Yarwood SJ, Curtis AS (2004) Effect of cellular uptake of gelatin nanoparticles on adhesion, morphology and cytoskeleton organisation of human fibroblasts. J Control Release 95:197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2003.11.00610.1016/j.jconrel.2003.11.006 ↗
23. Higuchi T (1963) Mechanism of sustained-action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 52:1145–114910.1002/jps.2600521210 ↗
24. Hillaireau H, Couvreur P (2009) Nanocarriers’ entry into the cell: relevance to drug delivery Cell. Mol Life Sci 66:2873–2896. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0053-z10.1007/s00018-009-0053-z ↗
25. Hu CS, Chiang CH, Hong PD, Yeh MK (2012) Influence of charge on FITC-BSA-loaded chondroitin sulfate-chitosan nanoparticles upon cell uptake in human Caco-2 cell monolayers. Int J Nanomedicine 7:4861–4872. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S34770
26. Iyer AK, Khaled G, Fang J, Maeda H (2006) Exploiting the enhanced permeability and retention effect for tumor targeting. Drug Discov Today 11:812–818. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.07.00510.1016/j.drudis.2006.07.005 ↗
27. Jagani H, Rao JV, Palanimuthu VR, Hariharapura RC, Gang S (2013) A nanoformulation of siRNA and its role in cancer therapy: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Cell Mol Biol Lett 18:120–136. doi: 10.2478/s11658-012-0043-210.2478/s11658-012-0043-2 ↗
28. Jain N, Rajoriya V, Jain P, Jain A (2013) Lactosaminated-N-succinyl chitosan nanoparticles for hepatocyte-targeted delivery of acyclovir. J Nanopart Res 16:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-2136-x10.1155/2013/243831 ↗
29. Kamphorst AO, Guermonprez P, Dudziak D, Nussenzweig MC (2010) Route of antigen uptake differentially impacts presentation by dendritic cells and activated monocytes. J Immunol 185:3426–3435. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.100120510.4049/jimmunol.1001205 ↗
30. Khouri M, Hornsby W, Risum N, Velazquez E, Thomas S, Lane A, Scott J, Koelwyn G, Herndon J, Mackey J, Douglas P, Jones L (2014) Utility of 3-dimensional echocardiography, global longitudinal strain, and exercise stress echocardiography to detect cardiac dysfunction in breast cancer patients treated with doxorubicin-containing adjuvant therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143:531–539. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2818-110.1007/s10549-013-2818-1 ↗
31. Korn ED, Weisman RA (1967) Phagocytosis of latex beads by Acanthamoeba. II. Electron microscopic study of the initial events. J Cell Biol 34:219–22710.1083/jcb.34.1.219 ↗
32. Lin A, Chen J, Liu Y, Deng S, Wu Z, Huang Y, Ping Q (2009) Preparation and evaluation of N-caproyl chitosan nanoparticles surface modified with glycyrrhizin for hepatocyte targeting. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 35:1348–1355. doi: 10.1080/0363904090293919710.3109/03639040902939197 ↗
33. Linares J, Matesanz MC, Vila M, Feito MJ, Gonçalves G, Vallet-Regí M, Marques PA, Portolés MT (2014) Endocytic mechanisms of graphene oxide nanosheets in osteoblasts, hepatocytes and macrophages. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:13697–706. doi: 10.1021/am503159810.1021/am5031598 ↗
34. Lipshultz SE, Lipsitz SR, Mone SM, Goorin AM, Sallan SE, Sanders SP, Orav EJ, Gelber RD, Colan SD (1995) Female sex and higher drug dose as risk factors for late cardiotoxic effects of doxorubicin therapy for childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 332:1738–1744. doi: 10.1056/NEJM19950629332260210.1056/NEJM199506293322602 ↗
35. Meng H, Xue M, Xia T, Ji Z, Tarn DY, Zink JI, Nel AE (2011) Use of size and a copolymer design feature to improve the biodistribution and the enhanced permeability and retention effect of doxorubicin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles in a murine xenograft tumor model. ACS Nano 5:4131–4144. doi: 10.1021/nn200809t10.1021/nn200809t ↗
36. Mishra D, Jain N, Rajoriya V, Jain AK (2014) Glycyrrhizin conjugated chitosan nanoparticles for hepatocyte-targeted delivery of lamivudine. J Pharm Pharmacol. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12235
37. Tenuta T, Monopoli MP, Kim J, Salvati A, Dawson KA, Sandin P, Lynch I (2011) Elution of labile fluorescent dye from nanoparticles during biological use. PLoS One 6(10):e25556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.002555610.1371/journal.pone.0025556 ↗
38. Uebelhart D, Thonar EJMA, Delmas PD, Chantraine A, Vignon E (1998) Effects of oral chondroitin sulfate on the progression of knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study. Osteoarthr Cartil 6(Suppl. A):39–46. doi: 10.1016/S1063-4584(98)80011-310.1016/S1063-4584(98)80011-3 ↗
39. VandeVord PJ, Matthew HWT, DeSilva SP, Mayton L, Wu B, Wooley PH (2002) Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice. J Biomed Mater Res 59:585–590. doi: 10.1002/jbm.127010.1002/jbm.1270 ↗
40. Verma A, Stellacci F (2010) Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions Small. 6(1):12–21
41. Vivek R, Thangam R, Nipunbabu V, Ponraj T, Kannan S (2014) Oxaliplatin-chitosan nanoparticles induced intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway: a “smart” drug delivery system to breast cancer cell therapy. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 65:289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.01.05410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.01.054 ↗
42. Wang LF, Wang JM, Chiang YL (2002) Insolubilization of sodium chondroitin sulfate by forming a semi-interpenetrating polymer network with acrylic acid: a potential carrier for colon-specific drug delivery. J Appl Polym Sci 85:114–122. doi: 10.1002/app.1066210.1002/app.10662 ↗
43. Win KY, Feng SS (2005) Effects of particle size and surface coating on cellular uptake of polymeric nanoparticles for oral delivery of anticancer drugs. Biomaterials 26:2713–2722. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.05010.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.050 ↗
44. Wong HL, Chattopadhyay N, Wu XY, Bendayan R (2010) Nanotechnology applications for improved delivery of antiretroviral drugs to the brain. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62:503–517. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.02010.1016/j.addr.2009.11.020 ↗
45. Yeh MK, Cheng KM, Hu CS, Huang YC, Young JJ (2011) Novel protein-loaded chondroitin sulfate–chitosan nanoparticles: preparation and characterization. Acta Biomaterialia 7:3804–3812. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.02610.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.026 ↗
46. Zhao L, Burguera EF, Xu HHK, Amin N, Ryou H, Arola DD (2010) Fatigue and human umbilical cord stem cell seeding characteristics of calcium phosphate–chitosan–biodegradable fiber scaffolds. Biomaterials 31:840–847. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.10610.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.106 ↗