journal article·2006-12-29

Reduction of nanoparticle exposure to welding aerosols by modification of the ventilation system in a workplace

Myong-Hwa Lee, William J. McClellan, Joe Candela, Dan Andrews, Pratim Biswas

Publisher page

Abstract

Nanometer particle size distributions were measured in booths with two different ventilation patterns in an occupational environment with welding operations underway. The measurements were used to illustrate the impact of change of ventilation methods (existing — with ventilation ducts located at the top, modified — with ventilation ducts located below the weld bench) on the aerosol size distributions at different locations: close to the weld, in the vicinity of the welder’s face, and in the exhaust duct. Particle number concentrations measured in the vicinity of the welder’s face (mask) during a horizontal standard arc welding process in a booth with ventilation at the top was in the range of 7.78×105 particles cm−3 with a geometric mean size of 181 nm and geometric standard deviation of 1.8. This reduced to 1.48×104 particles cm−3 in the vicinity of the welder’s face with the modified ventilation system. The clearance of the welding aerosol was also faster in the modified booth (6 min compared to 11 min in a conventional booth). Particles were collected in the booth for the various test conditions, and analyzed to determine their composition and morphology. The particles were composed of hazardous heavy metals such as manganese, chromium and nickel, and had varying morphologies.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Air Quality and Health Impacts · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. AFSCME, 2004. Welding hazards. http://www.afscme.org/health/faq-weld.htm
2. ACGIH, 1994. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices, Cincinnati, OH. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
3. Antonini J.M., Lewis A.B., Roberts J.R., Whaley D.A., 2003. Pulmonary effects of welding fumes: Review of worker and experimental animal studies Am. J. Ind. Med. 43(4):350–36010.1002/ajim.10194 ↗
4. Biswas P., Yang G., Zachariah M.R., 1998. In situ processing of ferroelectric materials from lead waste streams by injection of gas phase titanium precursors: Laser induced fluorescence and X-ray diffraction measurements Combust. Sci. Technol. 134(1–6):183–20010.1080/00102209808924132 ↗
5. Biswas P., Wu C.Y., 2005. Nanoparticles and the environment: A critical review paper J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 55:708–74610.1080/10473289.2005.10464656 ↗
6. Konarski P., Iwanejko I., Cwil M., 2003. Core-shell morphology of welding fume micro- and nanoparticles Vacuum 70(2–3):385–38910.1016/S0042-207X(02)00674-7 ↗
7. Kuo Y.M., Huang S.H., Shih T.S., Chen C.C., Weng Y.M., Lin W.Y., 2005. Development of a size-selective inlet-simulating ICRP lung deposition fraction Aerosol Sci. Technol. 39(5):437–44310.1080/027868290956602 ↗
8. McNeilly J.D., Heal M.R., Beverland I.J., Howe A., Gibson M.D., Hibbs l.R., MacNee W., Donaldson K., 2004. Soluble transition metals cause the pro-inflammatory effects of welding fumes in vitro Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 196(1):95–10710.1016/j.taap.2003.11.021 ↗
9. NIOSH, 1988. NIOSH Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Welding, brazing, and Thermal Cutting. DHHS (NIOSH) publication No. 88–110, Cincinnati, OH
10. Savage N., Diallo M.S., 2005. Nanomaterials and water purification: Opportunities and challenges J. Nanoparticle Res. 7(4–5):331–34210.1007/s11051-005-7523-5 ↗
11. Sjogren B., Hansen K.S., Kjuus H., Persson P.G., 1994. Exposure to stainless-steel welding fumes and lung-cancer – a metaanalysis Occup. Environ. Med. 51(5):335–33610.1136/oem.51.5.335 ↗
12. Stephenson D., Seshadri G., Veranth J.M., 2003. Workplace exposure to submicron particle mass and number concentrations from manual arc welding of carbon steel AIHA J. 64(4):516–52110.1080/15428110308984848 ↗
13. Stern R.M., 1983. Assessment of risk of lung cancer for welders Arch. Environ. Health 38:148–15510.1080/00039896.1983.10543996 ↗
14. Vincent J.H., Clement C.F., 2000. Ultrafine particles in workplace atmospheres. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London A Mathematical Phys. Eng. Sci. 358(1775):2673–268210.1098/rsta.2000.0676 ↗
15. Zimmer A.T., Baron P.A., Biswas P., 2002. The influence of operational parameters on number-weighted aerosol size distribution generated from a gas metal arc welding process J. Aerosol Sci. 33:519–53110.1016/S0021-8502(01)00189-6 ↗
16. Zimmer A.T., Biswas P., 2001. Characterization of the aerosols resulting from arc welding processes J. Aerosol Sci. 32: 993–100810.1016/S0021-8502(01)00035-0 ↗