journal article·2015-03

Tiered guidance for risk-informed environmental health and safety testing of nanotechnologies

Zachary A. Collier, Alan J. Kennedy, Aimee R. Poda, Michael F. Cuddy, Robert D. Moser, Robert I. MacCuspie, Ashley Harmon, Kenton Plourde, Christopher D. Haines, Jeffery A. Steevens

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 17· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Provided the rapid emergence of novel technologies containing engineered nanomaterials, there is a need to better understand the potential environmental, health, and safety effects of nanotechnologies before wide-scale deployment. However, the unique properties of nanomaterials and uncertainty regarding applicable test methods have led to a lack of consensus regarding the collection and evaluation of data related to hazard and exposure potentials. Often, overly conservative approaches to characterization and data collection result in prolonged, unfocused, or irrelevant testing, which increases costs and delays deployment. In this paper, we provide a novel testing guidance framework for determining whether a nanotechnology has the potential to release material with nano-specific parameters that pose a risk to humans or the environment. The framework considers methods to categorize nanotechnologies by their structure and within their relevant-use scenarios to inform testing in a time- and resource-limited reality. Based on the precedent of dredged sediment testing, a five-tiered approach is proposed in which opportunities are presented to conclude testing once sufficient risk-related information has been collected, or that the technology in question does not require nano-specific scrutiny. A series of screening stages are suggested, covering relevant aspects including size, surface area, distribution, unique behaviors, and release potential. The tiered, adaptive guidance approach allows users to concentrate on collecting the most relevant data, thus accelerating technology deployment while minimizing risk.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006) Standard terminology relating to nanotechnology. E 2456–06
2. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2007) Standard guide for handling unbound engineered nanoscale particles in occupational settings. E 2535–07
3. Asharani PV, Iianwu Y, Gong Z, Valiyaveettil S (2011) Comparison of the toxicity of silver, gold and platinum nanoparticle in developing zebrafish embryos. Nanotoxicol 5:43–5410.3109/17435390.2010.489207 ↗
4. Bae S, Hwang Y, Lee Y, Lee SK (2013) Effects of water chemistry on aggregation and soil adsorption of silver nanoparticles. Environ Health Toxicol 28:e201300610.5620/eht.2013.28.e2013006 ↗
5. Bednar AJ, Poda AR, Mitrano DM, Kennedy AJ, Gray EP, Ranville JF, Hayes CA, Crocekr FH, Steevens JA (2013) Comparison of on-line detectors for field flow fractionation analysis of nanomaterials. Talanta 104:140–14810.1016/j.talanta.2012.11.008 ↗
6. Benn T, Cavanagh B, Hristovski K, Posner JD, Westerhoff P (2010) The release of nanosilver from consumer products used in the home. J Environ Qual 39:1875–188210.2134/jeq2009.0363 ↗
7. Bondarenko O, Juganson K, Ivask A, Kasemets K, Mortimer M, Kahru A (2013) Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a critical review. Arch Toxicol 87:1181–120010.1007/s00204-013-1079-4 ↗
8. Bowman CR, Bailey FC, Elrod-Erickson M, Neigh A, Otter R (2012) Effects of silver nanoparticles on zebrafish (Danio rerio) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922): a comparison of toxicity based on total surface area versus mass concentration of particles in a model eukaryotic and prokaryotic system. Environ Toxicol Chem 31(8):1793–180010.1002/etc.1881 ↗
9. Brouwer DH (2012) Control banding approaches for nanomaterials. Ann Occup Hyg 56(5):506–514
10. Brown DM, Wilson MR, MacNee W, Stone V, Donaldson K (2001) Size-dependent pro-inflammatory effects of ultrafine polystyrene particles: a role for surface area and oxidative stress in enhanced activity of ultrafines. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 175:191–19910.1006/taap.2001.9240 ↗
11. Brydson RM, Hammond C (2005) Generic methodologies for nanotechnology: classification and fabrication. In: Kelsall RW, Hamley IW, Geoghegan M (eds) Nanoscale science and technology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–5510.1002/0470020873.ch1 ↗
12. Calliess C, Stockhaus H (2012) Precautionary principle and nanomaterials: REACH revisited. J Eur Environ Plan Law 9(2):113–13510.1163/187601012X639817 ↗
13. Canis L, Linkov I, Seager TP (2010) Application of stochastic multiattribute analysis to assessment of single walled carbon nanotube synthesis processes. Environ Sci Technol 44:8704–871110.1021/es102117k ↗
14. Choi J-Y, Ramchandran G, Kandlikar M (2009) The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. Environ Sci Technol 43(9):3030–303410.1021/es802388s ↗
15. Cohen Y, Rallo R, Liu R, Liu HH (2012) In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk. Acc Chem Res 46(3):802–81210.1021/ar300049e ↗
16. Coleman JC, Kennedy AJ, Bednar AJ, Ranville JF, Laird JG, Harmon AR, Hayes CA, Gray EP, Higgins CP, Lotufo G, Steevens JA (2013) Comparing the effects of nanosilver size and coating variations on bioavailability, internalization, and elimination, using Lumbriculus variegatus. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:2069–207710.1002/etc.2278 ↗
17. Cooper RJ (1990) Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Bus Horizons 33(3):44–5410.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-I ↗
18. Crane M, Handy RD, Garrod J, Owen R (2008) Ecotoxicity test methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicol 17:421–43710.1007/s10646-008-0215-z ↗
19. Davies JC (2009) Oversight of next generation nanotechnology. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC
20. Demirdjian ZS (2005) Problems and prospects of nanotechnology: implications for marketing innovations. Proceedings of the Academy of Business and Administrative Sciences conference, Quebec City, Canada, July 20–22
21. Donaldson K, Li X, MacNee W (1998) Ultrafine (nanometre) particle mediated lung injury. J Aerosol Sci 29(5–6):553–56010.1016/S0021-8502(97)00464-3 ↗
22. Eddy D, Krishamurty S, Grosse I, Witherell P, Wileden J, Lewis K (2014) An integrated approach to information modeling for the sustainable design of products. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 14:1–1310.1115/1.4027375 ↗
23. el Badawy AM, Silva RG, Morris B, Scheckel KG, Suidan MT, Tolaymat TM (2011) Surface charge-dependent toxicity of silver nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 45:283–28710.1021/es1034188 ↗
24. Environmental Defense DuPont Nano Partnership (2007) Nano risk framework. http://www.nanoriskframework.com/files/2011/11/6496_Nano-Risk-Framework.pdf . Accessed 22 Aug 2014
25. Environmental Law Institute (2005) Securing the promise of nanotechnology: is U.S. environmental law up to the job?. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC
26. European Commission (EC) (2011) Commission recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of nanomaterial (2011/696/EU). Off J Eur Union L275:38–40. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:275:0038:0040:EN:PDF . Accessed 22 Aug 2014
27. Fabrega J, Luoma SN, Tyler CR (2011) Silver nanoparticles: behavior and effects in the aquatic environment. Environ Int 37(2):517–53110.1016/j.envint.2010.10.012 ↗
28. Fan W, Wang X, Cui M, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Yu T, Guo L (2012) Differential oxidative stress of octahedral cubic Cu20 micro/nanocrystals to Daphnia magna. Environ Sci Technol 46(18):10255–1026210.1021/es3011578 ↗
29. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2012) FDA’s approach to regulation of nanotechnology products. http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/Nanotechnology/ucm301114.htm . Accessed 22 Aug 2014
30. Gabbert S, Weikard H-P (2010) A theory of chemicals regulation and testing. Nat Resour Forum 34:155–16410.1111/j.1477-8947.2010.01300.x ↗
31. Gaiser BK, Biswas A, Rosenkranz P, Jepson MA, Lead JR, Stone V, Tyler CR, Fernandes TF (2011) Effects of silver and cerium dioxide micro- and nano-sized particles on Daphnia magna. J Environ Monit 13:1227–123510.1039/c1em10060b ↗
32. Garcia-Reyero N, Kennedy AJ, Escalon BL, Habib T, Laird JG, Rawat A, Wiseman S, Hecker M, Denslow N, Steevens JA, Perkins EJ (2014) Differential effects and potential adverse outcomes of ionic silver and silver nanoparticles in vivo and in vitro. Environ Sci Technol 48:4546–455510.1021/es4042258 ↗
33. Ging J, Tejerina-Anton R, Ramakrishnan G, Nielsen M, Murphy K, Gorham JM, Nguyen T, Orlov A (2014) Development of a conceptual framework for evaluation of nanomaterials release from nanocomposites: environmental and toxicological implications. Sci Tot Environ 473–474:9–1910.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.135 ↗
34. Gottschalk F, Nowack B (2011) The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. J Environ Monit 13:1145–115510.1039/c0em00547a ↗
35. Grieger KD, Linkov I, Hansen SF, Baun A (2012) Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: review and evaluation of frameworks. Nanotoxicol 6(2):196–21210.3109/17435390.2011.569095 ↗
36. Griffitt RJ, Luo J, Gao J, Bonzongo JC, Barber DS (2008) Effects of particle composition and species on toxicity of metallic nanomaterials in aquatic organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1972–197810.1897/08-002.1 ↗
37. Griffitt RJ, Hyndman K, Denslow ND, Barber DS (2009) Comparison of molecular and histological changes in zebrafish gills exposed to metallic nanoparticles. Toxicol Sci 107:404–41510.1093/toxsci/kfn256 ↗
38. Handy RD, Cornelis G, Fernandes T et al (2012a) Ecotoxicity test methods for engineered nanomaterials: practical experiences and recommendations from the bench. Environ Toxicol Chem 31(1):15–3110.1002/etc.706 ↗
39. Handy RD, van den Brink N, Chappell M et al (2012b) Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far? Ecotoxicol 21(4):933–97210.1007/s10646-012-0862-y ↗
40. Hansen SF, Larsen BH, Olsen SI, Baun A (2007) Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterials. Nanotoxicol 1(3):243–25010.1080/17435390701727509 ↗
41. Hansen SF, Michelson ES, Kamper A, Borling P, Stuer-Lauridsen F, Baun A (2008) Ecotoxicity test methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17:438–44710.1007/s10646-008-0210-4 ↗
42. Hansen SF, Maynard A, Baun A, Tickner JA, Bowman DM (2014a) What are the warning signs that we should be looking for? In: Hull M, Bowman DM (eds) Nanotechnology risk management, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 9–24
43. Hansen SF, Jensen KA, Baun A (2014b) NanoRiskCat: a conceptual tool for categorization and communication of exposure potentials and hazards of nanomaterials in consumer products. J Nanopart Res. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-2195-z
44. Harmon AR, Kennedy AJ, Poda AR, Bednar AJ, Chappell MA, Steevens JA (2014) Determination of nanosilver dissolution kinetics and toxicity in an environmentally relevant aqueous medium. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:1783–179110.1002/etc.2616 ↗
45. Hartung T (2010) Food for thought on alternative methods for nanoparticle safety testing. ALTEX 27(2):87–9510.14573/altex.2010.2.87 ↗
46. Hull M, Bowman D (2010) Nanotechnology environmental health and safety: risks, regulation and management. Elsevier, Oxford, UK
47. Hull MS, Kennedy AJ, Steevens JA, Bednar AJ, Weiss CA, Vikesland PJ (2009) Release of metal impurities from carbon nanomaterials influences aquatic toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 43(11):4169–417410.1021/es802483p ↗
48. Hull M, Kennedy AJ, Detzel C, Vikesland PJ, Chappell MA (2012) Moving beyond mass: the unmet need to consider dose metrics in environmental nanotoxicology studies. Environ Sci Technol 46:10881–1088210.1021/es3035285 ↗
49. ISO (2008) Nanotechnologies terminology and definitions for nano objects—nanoparticle, nanofibre, and nanoplate. ISO/TS 27687
50. ISO (2010) Nanotechnologies—vocabulary—part 1: core terms. ISO/TS 80004-1:2010(E)
51. ISO (2011) Nanotechnologies—vocabulary—part 4: nanostructured materials. ISO/TS 80004-4:2011(E)
52. ISO (2014) Nanotechnologies—considerations for the development of chemical nomenclatures for selected nano-objects. ISO TR 14786
53. Jiang J, Oberdorster G, Biswas P (2009) Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J Nanopart Res 11:77–8910.1007/s11051-008-9446-4 ↗
54. Kennedy AJ, Gunter JC, Chappell MA, Goss JG, Hull MS, Kirgan RA, Steevens JA (2009) Influence of nanotube preparation in aquatic bioassays. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:1930–193810.1897/09-024.1 ↗
55. Kennedy AJ, Hull MS, Bednar AJ, Goss JD, Gunter JC, Bouldin JL, Vikesland PJ, Steevens JA (2010) Fractionating nanosilver: importance for determining toxicity to aquatic test organisms. Environ Sci Technol 44:9571–957710.1021/es1025382 ↗
56. Kennedy AJ, Chappell MA, Bednar AJ, Ryan AC, Laird JG, Stanley JK, Steevens JA (2012) Impact of organic carbon on the stability and toxicity of fresh and stored silver nanoparticle. Environ Sci Technol 46:10772–1078010.1021/es302322y ↗
57. Kennedy AJ, Melby ML, Moser RD, Bednar AJ, Son SF, Lounds CD, Laird JG, Nellums RR, Johnson DR, Steevens JA (2013) Fate and toxicity of CuO nanospheres and nanorods used in Al/CuO nanothermites before and after combustion. Environ Sci Technol 47(19):11258–1126710.1021/es401837f ↗
58. Kennedy AJ, Diamond S, Stanley JK, Coleman J, Steevens JA, Chappell MA, Laird JG, Bednar A (2014) Nanomaterials ecotoxicology: a case study with nanosilver. In: Hull MS, Bowman D (eds) Nanotechnology environmental health and safety: risks, regulation and management, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 117–15110.1016/B978-1-4557-3188-6.00006-2 ↗
59. Kimbrell GA (2007) Nanotechnology and nanomaterial personal care products: necessary oversight and recommendations. In: Betton CI (ed) Global regulatory issues for the cosmetics industry. William Andrew, Norwich, NY
60. Kittler S, Greulich C, Diedorf J, Koller M, Epple M (2010) Toxicity of silver nanoparticles increases during storage because of slow dissolution under release of silver ions. Chem Mater 22:4548–455410.1021/cm100023p ↗
61. Klaine SJ, Alvarez P, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, Mahendra S, McLaughlin MJ, Lead JR (2008) Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1825–185110.1897/08-090.1 ↗
62. Kovacs T, Naish V, O’Connor B, Blaise C, Gagne F, Hall L, Trudeau V, Martel P (2010) An ecotoxicological characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC). Nanotoxicol 4:255–27010.3109/17435391003628713 ↗
63. Kreyling WG, Semmler-Behnke M, Chaudhry Q (2010) A complementary definition of nanomaterial. Nano Today 5(3):165–16810.1016/j.nantod.2010.03.004 ↗
64. Li T, Albee B, Alemayehu M, Diaz R, Ingham L, Kamal S, Rodriguex M, Bishnoi SW (2010) Comparative toxicity study of Ag, Au, Ag-Au bimetallic nanoparticles on Daphnia magna. Anal Bioanal Chem 398:689–70010.1007/s00216-010-3915-1 ↗
65. Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Monica JC Jr, Hansen SF, Davis TA (2009) Nano risk governance: current developments and future perspectives. Nanotechnol Law Bus 6:203–220
66. Linkov I, Bates ME, Canis LJ, Seager TP, Keisler JM (2011) A decision-directed approach for prioritizing research into the impact of nanomaterials on the environment and human health. Nat Nanotechnol 6:784–78710.1038/nnano.2011.163 ↗
67. Linkov I, Trump BD, Pabon N, Collier ZA, Keisler JM, Scriven J (2012) A decision analytic approach for Department of Defense acquisition risk management. Mil Oper Res 17(2):53–7010.5711/1082598317257 ↗
68. Linkov I, Bates ME, Trump BD, Seager TP, Chappell MA, Keisler JM (2013) For nanotechnology decisions, use decision analysis. Nano Today 8:5–1010.1016/j.nantod.2012.10.002 ↗
69. Linkov I, Anklam E, Collier ZA, DiMase D, Renn O (2014) Risk-based standards: integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches. Environ Sys Decis 34(1):134–13710.1007/s10669-014-9488-3 ↗
70. Liu J, Hurt RH (2010) Ion release kinetics and particle persistence in aqueous nano-silver colloids. Environ Sci Technol 44:2169–217510.1021/es9035557 ↗
71. Lövestam G, Rauscher H, Roebben G, Klüttgen BS, Gibson N, Putaud J-P, Stamm H (2010) Considerations on a definition of nanomaterial for regulatory purposes. EUR 24403 EN
72. Ma H, Brennan A, Diamond SA (2012) Phototoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticle under solar radiation to two aquatic species: Daphnia magna and Japanese Medaka. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:1621–162910.1002/etc.1858 ↗
73. MacCuspie RI (2014) Characterization of nanomaterials for nanoEHS studies. In: Hull MS, Bowman D (eds) Nanotechnology environmental health and safety: risks, regulation and management, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 55–7610.1016/B978-1-4557-3188-6.00004-9 ↗
74. MacCuspie RI, Rogers K, Patra M, Suo Z, Allen AJ, Martin MN, Hackley VA (2014) Challenges for physical characterization of silver nanoparticles under pristine and environmentally relevant conditions. J Environ Monit 13:1212–122610.1039/c1em10024f ↗
75. Metcalfe C, Bennett E, Chappell M, Depledge M, Goss G, Goudey S, Kaczmar S, Obrien N, Picado A, Ramadan AB, Steevens J (2009) SMARTEN: strategic management and assessment of risks and toxicity of engineered nanomaterials. In: Linkov I, Steevens J (eds) Nanomaterials: risks and benefits. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 95–10910.1007/978-1-4020-9491-0_7 ↗
76. Mitchell J, Pabon N, Collier ZA, Egeghy PP, Cohen-Hubal E, Linkov I, Vallero DA (2013) A decision analytic approach to exposure-based chemical prioritization. PLoS ONE 8(8):e7091110.1371/journal.pone.0070911 ↗
77. Mohan M, Trump BD, Bates ME, Monica JC Jr, Linkov I (2012) Integrating legal liabilities in nanomanufacturing risk management. Environ Sci Technol 46:7955–796210.1021/es3003266 ↗
78. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2013) Current strategies for engineering controls in nanomaterial production and downstream handling processes. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2014-102/pdfs/2014-102.pdf . Accessed 22 Aug 2014
79. National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) (2007) National nanotechnology initiative strategic plan. http://www.nano.gov/NNIStrategicPlan2007.pdf . Accessed 22 Aug 2014
80. National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) (2011) Environmental, health, and safety research strategy. National Science and Technology Council, Washington, DC. http://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/nni_2011_ehs_research_strategy.pdf . Accessed 22 Aug 2014
81. National Research Council (NRC) (2013) Research progress on environmental, health, and safety aspects of engineered nanomaterials. National Academic, Washington, DC
82. Notter DA, Mitrano DM, Nowack B (2014) Are nanosized of dissolved metals more toxic in the environment? A meta-analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem (in press)10.1002/etc.2732 ↗
83. Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–83910.1289/ehp.7339 ↗
84. Oberdorster E, Zhu SQ, Blickley TM, McClellan-Green P, Haasch ML (2006) Ecotoxicology of carbon-based engineered nanoparticles: effects of fullerene (C-60) on aquatic organisms. Carbon 44:1112–112010.1016/j.carbon.2005.11.008 ↗
85. Oberdorster G, Stone V, Donaldson K (2007) Toxicology of nanoparticles: a historical perspective. Nanotoxicol 1:2–2510.1080/17435390701314761 ↗
86. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2010) Nanoscale Materials; Reporting Under TSCA Section 8(a). RIN 2070-AJ54. Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC. http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201010&RIN=2070-AJ54 . Accessed 22 Aug 2014
87. Olson MS, Gurian PL (2012) Risk assessment strategies as nanomaterials transition into commercial applications. J Nanopart Res 14:786–79210.1007/s11051-012-0786-8 ↗
88. Oomen AG, Bos PMJ, Fernandes TF et al (2014) Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment—report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10. Nanotoxicol 8(3):334–34810.3109/17435390.2013.802387 ↗
89. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2012) Guidance on sample preparation and dosimetry for the safety testing of manufactured nanomaterials. Series on the safety of manufactured nanomaterials, No. 36 ENV/JM/MONO(2012)40
90. Osborne O, Johnson B, Moger J, Balousha M, Lead JR, Kudoh T, Tyler CR (2012) Effects of particle size and coating on nanoscale Ag and TiO2 exposure in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Nanotoxicol 7(8):1315–132410.3109/17435390.2012.737484 ↗
91. Petersen EJ, Zhang L, Mattison NT, O’Carrol DM, Whelton AJ, Uddin N, Nguyen T, Huang Q, Henry TB, Holbrook RD, Chen KC (2013) Potential release pathways, environmental fate, and ecological risks of carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Technol 45:9837–985610.1021/es201579y ↗
92. Petersen EJ, Henry TB, Zhao J, MacCuspie RI, Kirschling TL, Dobrovolskaia MA, Hackley V, Xing B, White JC (2014) Identification and avoidance of potential artifacts and misinterpretations in nanomaterial ecotoxicity measurements. Environ Sci Technol 48:4226–424610.1021/es4052999 ↗
93. Pettitt ME, Lead JR (2013) Minimum physicochemical characterization requirements for nanomaterial regulation. Environ Int 52:41–5010.1016/j.envint.2012.11.009 ↗
94. Poda AR, Bednar AJ, Kennedy AJ, Harmon A, Hull M, Mitrano DM, Ranville JF, Steevens J (2011) Characterization of silver nanoparticles using flow–field flow fractionation interfaces to inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1218(27):4219–422510.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.076 ↗
95. Pokropivny VV, Skorokhod VV (2007) Classification of nanostructures by dimensionality and concept of surface forms engineering in nanomaterial science. Mater Sci Eng C 27:990–99310.1016/j.msec.2006.09.023 ↗
96. Rabolli V, Thomassen LCJ, Uwambayinema F, Martens JA, Lison D (2011) The cytotoxic activity of amorphous silica nanoparticle is mainly influenced by surface area not by aggregation. Toxicol Lett 206:197–20310.1016/j.toxlet.2011.07.013 ↗
97. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2005) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: maximizing human benefit. J Nanopart Res 7:1–1310.1007/s11051-004-2336-5 ↗
98. Romer I, White TA, Baalousha M, Chipman K, Viant MR, Lead JR (2011) Aggregation and dispersion of silver nanopartciles in exposure media for aquatic toxicity tests. J Chromatogr A 1218:4226–423310.1016/j.chroma.2011.03.034 ↗
99. SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks) (2010) Opinion on the scientific basis for the definition of the term “nanomaterial”, 8 December 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_o_032.pdf . Accessed 22 Aug 2014
100. Sotiriou GA, Pratsinis SE (2010) Antibacterial activity of nanosilver ions and particles. Environ Sci Technol 44:5649–565410.1021/es101072s ↗