Core–shell hybrid nanocapsules for oral delivery of camptothecin: formulation development, in vitro and in vivo evaluation
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this study was to design and in vitro–in vivo evaluate oral nanocapsules prepared from amphiphilic cyclodextrins (CDs) or poly-e-caprolactone (PCL) for the effective oral delivery of an anticancer agent, camptothecin (CPT). CPT-loaded anionic and Chitosan (CS)-coated cationic nanocapsules were prepared and characterized in vitro. Morphological analysis was performed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). CPT release profile was evaluated using dialysis method under sink conditions. To determine the protective effect and drug stability provided by nanocapsules, all the formulations were incubated in simulated gastrointestinal media. Measurement of mucoadhesive tendency of CPT-loaded nanocapsules was realized by turbidimetric method. Penetration of nanocapsules was performed through an artificial mucus model. The permeability of CPT in solution form and bound to nanocapsule formulations were demonstrated across Caco-2 cell line. Finally, the intestinal uptake of nanocapsules was evaluated in vivo, in a mouse model. Both anionic and cationic formulations were in the range of 180–220 nm with a narrow size distribution and desired zeta potential values. CPT-loaded nanocapsules were found to be stable in simulated gastrointestinal media. Turbidimetric measurements confirmed the interaction between nanoparticles and mucin. Penetration of CPT through an artificial mucus gel layer was higher with CS-coated nanocapsules in accordance with the results obtained from permeability studies across Caco-2 cell line. In vivo animal studies confirmed that the intestinal uptake of nanocapsules was significantly higher with cationic nanocapsules. CPT-loaded positively charged CD nanocapsules might be an attractive and promising treatment for oral chemotherapy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems · Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Abbasi S, Paul A, Shao W, Prakash S (2012) Cationic albumin nanoparticles for enhanced drug delivery to treat breast cancer: preparation and in vitro assessment. J Drug Deliv 2012:686108. doi: 10.1155/2012/68610810.1155/2012/686108 ↗
2. Banna GL et al (2010) Anticancer oral therapy: emerging related issues. Cancer Treat Rev 36:595–605. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.04.00510.1016/j.ctrv.2010.04.005 ↗
3. Beloqui A, Solinis MA, des Rieux A, Preat V, Rodriguez-Gascon A (2014) Dextran-protamine coated nanostructured lipid carriers as mucus-penetrating nanoparticles for lipophilic drugs. Int J Pharm 468:105–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.04.02710.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.04.027 ↗
4. Bilensoy E, Doğan L, Şen M, Hıncal A (2007) Complexation behavior of antiestrogen drug tamoxifen citrate with natural and modified β-cyclodextrins. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem 57:651–655. doi: 10.1007/s10847-006-9268-x10.1007/s10847-006-9268-x ↗
5. Bowman K, Leong WK (2006) Chitosan nanoparticles for oral drug and gene delivery. Int J Nanomed 1(2):117–12810.2147/nano.2006.1.2.117 ↗
6. Bromberg L (2008) Polymeric micelles in oral chemotherapy. J Control Release 128:99–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.01.01810.1016/j.jconrel.2008.01.018 ↗
7. Cappello B et al (2006) Cyclodextrin-containing poly(ethyleneoxide) tablets for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: potential as buccal delivery system. Int J Pharm 319:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.03.03110.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.03.031 ↗
8. Carrier RL, Miller LA, Ahmed I (2007) The utility of cyclodextrins for enhancing oral bioavailability. J Control Release 123:78–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.07.01810.1016/j.jconrel.2007.07.018 ↗
9. Cauchetier E, Deniau M, Fessi H, Astier A, Paul M (2003) Atovaquone-loaded nanocapsules: influence of the nature of the polymer on their in vitro characteristics. Int J Pharm 250:273–281. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00556-210.1016/S0378-5173(02)00556-2 ↗
10. Cho HJ, Park JW, Yoon IS, Kim DD (2014) Surface-modified solid lipid nanoparticles for oral delivery of docetaxel: enhanced intestinal absorption and lymphatic uptake. Int J Nanomed 9:495–504. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S56648
11. Choi SY et al (2012) Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of positively charged chitosan gold nanoparticles in human lung adenocarcinoma cells. J Nanoparticle Res. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-1234-5
12. Cirpanli Y, Bilensoy E, Lale Dogan A, Calis S (2009) Comparative evaluation of polymeric and amphiphilic cyclodextrin nanoparticles for effective camptothecin delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 73:82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2009.04.01310.1016/j.ejpb.2009.04.013 ↗
13. Cirpanli Y, Bilensoy E, Dogan AL, Calis S (2010) Development of polymeric and cyclodextrin nanoparticles for camptothecin delivery. J Control Release 148:e21–e23. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.03410.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.034 ↗
14. Cirpanli Y, Allard E, Passirani C, Bilensoy E, Lemaire L, Calis S, Benoit JP (2011) Antitumoral activity of camptothecin-loaded nanoparticles in 9L rat glioma model. Int J Pharm 403:201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.10.01510.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.10.015 ↗
15. des Rieux A, Fievez V, Garinot M, Schneider YJ, Preat V (2006) Nanoparticles as potential oral delivery systems of proteins and vaccines: a mechanistic approach. J Control Release 116:1–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.08.01310.1016/j.jconrel.2006.08.013 ↗
16. Dong Y, Feng SS (2005) Poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide)/montmorillonite nanoparticles for oral delivery of anticancer drugs. Biomaterials 26:6068–6076. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.021 ↗
17. Ensign LM, Cone R, Hanes J (2012) Oral drug delivery with polymeric nanoparticles: the gastrointestinal mucus barriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:557–570. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.12.00910.1016/j.addr.2011.12.009 ↗
18. Erdogar N, Iskit AB, Eroglu H, Sargon MF, Mungan NA, Bilensoy E (2014) Cationic core-shell nanoparticles for intravesical chemotherapy in tumor-induced rat model: safety and efficacy. Int J Pharm 471:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.05.01410.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.05.014 ↗
19. Gelperina S, Kisich K, Iseman MD, Heifets L (2005) The potential advantages of nanoparticle drug delivery systems in chemotherapy of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172:1487–1490. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200504-613PP10.1164/rccm.200504-613PP ↗
20. Groo AC, Saulnier P, Gimel JC, Gravier J, Ailhas C, Benoit JP, Lagarce F (2013) Fate of paclitaxel lipid nanocapsules in intestinal mucus in view of their oral delivery. Int J Nanomed 8:4291–4302. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S51837
21. Iekhsan Othman AA (2011) Oral nano-insulin therapy: current progress on nanoparticle-based devices for intestinal epithelium-targeted insulin delivery. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. doi: 10.4172/2157-7439.s4-007
22. Jung T, Kamm W, Breitenbach A, Kaiserling E, Xiao JX, Kissel T (2000) Biodegradable nanoparticles for oral delivery of peptides: Is there a role for polymers to affect mucosal uptake? Eur J Pharm Biopharm 50:147–160. doi: 10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00084-910.1016/S0939-6411(00)00084-9 ↗
23. Junginger, HE (2009) Polymeric permeation enhancers. In: Schnürch AB (ed) Oral delivery of macromolecular drugs. Springer Science & Business Media, pp 103–122.10.1007/978-1-4419-0200-9_6 ↗
24. Kalaria DR, Sharma G, Beniwal V, Ravi Kumar MN (2009) Design of biodegradable nanoparticles for oral delivery of doxorubicin: in vivo pharmacokinetics and toxicity studies in rats. Pharm Res 26:492–501. doi: 10.1007/s11095-008-9763-410.1007/s11095-008-9763-4 ↗
25. Ke W, Zhao Y, Huang R, Jiang C, Pei Y (2008) Enhanced oral bioavailability of doxorubicin in a dendrimer drug delivery system. J Pharm Sci 97:2208–2216. doi: 10.1002/jps.2115510.1002/jps.21155 ↗
26. Khayata N, Abdelwahed W, Chehna MF, Charcosset C, Fessi H (2012) Preparation of vitamin E loaded nanocapsules by the nanoprecipitation method: from laboratory scale to large scale using a membrane contactor. Int J Pharm 423:419–427. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.12.01610.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.12.016 ↗
27. Lai SK, Wang YY, Hanes J (2009) Mucus-penetrating nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to mucosal tissues. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:158–171. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.11.00210.1016/j.addr.2008.11.002 ↗
28. Loftsson T, Másson M, Sigurðsson HH, Magnússon P, La Goffic F (1989) Cyclodextrins as co-enhancers in dermal and transdermal drug delivery. Pharmazie 53:137–139
29. Luo C, Sun J, Du Y, He Z (2014) Emerging integrated nanohybrid drug delivery systems to facilitate the intravenous-to-oral switch in cancer chemotherapy. J Control Release 176:94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.12.03010.1016/j.jconrel.2013.12.030 ↗
30. Memişoğlu E, Bochot A, Şen M, Charon D, Duchêne D, Hincal AA (2002) Amphiphilic beta cyclodextrins modified on the primary face: synthesis, characterization and evaluation of their potential as novel excipients in the preparation of nanocapsules. J Pharm Sci 91(5):1214–122410.1002/jps.10105 ↗
31. Mora-Huertas CE, Fessi H, Elaissari A (2010) Polymer-based nanocapsules for drug delivery. Int J Pharm 385:113–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.10.01810.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.10.018 ↗
32. Noronha CM, Granada AF, de Carvalho SM, Lino RC, de OB Maciel MV, Barreto PLM (2013) Optimization of α-tocopherol loaded nanocapsules by the nanoprecipitation method. Ind Crops Prod 50:896–903. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.08.01510.1016/j.indcrop.2013.08.015 ↗
33. Opanasopit P et al (2006) Incorporation of camptothecin into N-phthaloyl chitosan-g-mPEG self-assembly micellar system. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 64:269–276. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.06.00110.1016/j.ejpb.2006.06.001 ↗
34. Plapied L, Duhem N, des Rieux A, Préat V (2011) Fate of polymeric nanocarriers for oral drug delivery. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 16:228–237. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.12.00510.1016/j.cocis.2010.12.005 ↗
35. Roger E, Lagarce F, Benoit JP (2011) Development and characterization of a novel lipid nanocapsule formulation of Sn38 for oral administration. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 79:181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.01.02110.1016/j.ejpb.2011.01.021 ↗
36. Sadeghi AM et al (2008) Permeation enhancer effect of chitosan and chitosan derivatives: comparison of formulations as soluble polymers and nanoparticulate systems on insulin absorption in Caco-2 cells. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 70:270–278. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.03.00410.1016/j.ejpb.2008.03.004 ↗
37. Sahana DK, Mittal G, Bhardwaj V, Kumar MN (2008) PLGA nanoparticles for oral delivery of hydrophobic drugs: influence of organic solvent on nanoparticle formation and release behavior in vitro and in vivo using estradiol as a model drug. J Pharm Sci 97:1530–1542. doi: 10.1002/jps.2115810.1002/jps.21158 ↗
38. Salustio PJ, Pontes P, Conduto C, Sanches I, Carvalho C, Arrais J, Marques HM (2011) Advanced technologies for oral controlled release: cyclodextrins for oral controlled release. AAPS PharmSciTech 12:1276–1292. doi: 10.1208/s12249-011-9690-210.1208/s12249-011-9690-2 ↗
39. Santos SS, Lorenzoni A, Pegoraro NS, Denardi LB, Alves SH, Schaffazick SR, Cruz L (2014) Formulation and in vitro evaluation of coconut oil-core cationic nanocapsules intended for vaginal delivery of clotrimazole. Colloids Surf, B 116:270–276. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.01.01110.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.01.011 ↗
40. Tahara K, Sakai T, Yamamoto H, Takeuchi H, Hirashima N, Kawashima Y (2009) Improved cellular uptake of chitosan-modified PLGA nanospheres by A549 cells. Int J Pharm 382:198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.07.02310.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.07.023 ↗
41. Thomas CJ, Rahier NJ, Hecht SM (2004) Camptothecin: current perspectives. Bioorganic Med Chem 12:1585–1604. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2003.11.03610.1016/j.bmc.2003.11.036 ↗
42. Ungaro F et al (2012) Dry powders based on PLGA nanoparticles for pulmonary delivery of antibiotics: modulation of encapsulation efficiency, release rate and lung deposition pattern by hydrophilic polymers. J Control Release 157:149–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.08.01010.1016/j.jconrel.2011.08.010 ↗
43. Venturini CG et al (2011) Formulation of lipid core nanocapsules. Colloids Surf, A 375:200–208. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.12.01110.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.12.011 ↗
44. Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW (2010) The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci 35:1217–1256. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 ↗
45. Yue ZG, Wei W, Lv PP, Yue H, Wang LY, Su ZG, Ma GH (2011) Surface charge affects cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of chitosan-based nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules 12:2440–2446. doi: 10.1021/bm101482r10.1021/bm101482r ↗
46. Zhang L, Hu Y, Jiang X, Yang C, Lu W, Yang YH (2004) Camptothecin derivative-loaded poly(caprolactone-co-lactide)-b-PEG-b-poly(caprolactone-co-lactide) nanoparticles and their biodistribution in mice. J Control Release 96:135–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.01.01010.1016/j.jconrel.2004.01.010 ↗