journal article·2010-03

Computer-assisted quantification of the multi-scale structure of films made of nanofibrillated cellulose

Gary Chinga-Carrasco, Kristin Syverud

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 12· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Films made of nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) are most interesting for use in packaging applications. However, in order to understand the film-forming capabilities of NFC and their properties, new advanced methods for characterizing the different scales of the structures are necessary. In this study, we perform a comprehensive characterisation of NFC-films, based on desktop scanner analysis, scanning electron microscopy in backscatter electron imaging mode (SEM-BEI), laser profilometry (LP) and field-emission scanning electron microscopy in secondary electron imaging mode (FE-SEM-SEI). Objective quantification is performed for assessing the (i) film thicknesses, (ii) fibril diameters and (iii) fibril orientations, based on computer-assisted electron microscopy. The most frequent fibril diameter is 20–30 nm in diameter. A method for acquiring FE-SEM images of NFC surfaces without a conductive metallic layer is introduced. Having appropriate characterisation tools, the structural and mechanical properties of the films upon moisture were quantified.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Abe K, Iwamoto S, Yano H (2007) Obtaining cellulose nanofibers with a uniform width of 15 nm from wood. Biomacromolecules 8:3276–327810.1021/bm700624p ↗
2. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics int 11(7):36–42
3. Ahola S, Salmi J, Johansson L-S, Laine J, Österberg M (2008) Model films from native cellulose nanofibrils, preparation, swelling, and surface interactions. Biomacromolecules 9:1273–128210.1021/bm701317k ↗
4. Andresen M, Johansson L-S, Tanem BS, Stenius P (2006) Properties and characterization of hydrophobized microfibrilated cellulose. Cellulose 13:665–66710.1007/s10570-006-9072-1 ↗
5. Antoine C (2007) Wire marking and its effect upon print-through perception of newsprints. Appita J 60(3):196–203
6. Bockus S (2006) A study of the microstructure and mechanical properties of continuously cast iron products. Metalurgija 45(4):287–290
7. Chinga G, Solheim O, Mörseburg K (2007a) Cross-sectional dimensions of fiber and pore networks based on Euclidean distance maps. Nordic Pulp Paper Res J 22(4):500–50710.3183/NPPRJ-2007-22-04-p500-507 ↗
8. Chinga G, Johnsen PO, Dougherty R, Lunden-Berli E, Walter J (2007b) Quantification of the 3D microstructure of SC surfaces. J Microscopy 227(3):254–26510.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01809.x ↗
9. Eriksen Ø, Syverud K, Gregersen Ø (2008) The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as a strength enhancer in TMP paper. Nord Pulp Paper Res J 23(3):299–30410.3183/NPPRJ-2008-23-03-p299-304 ↗
10. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A (2009) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 10:162–16510.1021/bm801065u ↗
11. Gonzalez R, Woods RE (1993) Digital image processing. Addison–Wesley, USA
12. Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindström T, Nishino T (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 9:1579–158510.1021/bm800038n ↗
13. I’Anson S (1995) Identification of periodic marks in paper and board by image analysis using two-dimensional fast Fourier transforms. Tappi J 78(3):113–119
14. Iwamoto S, Abe K, Yano H (2008) The effect of hemicelluloses on wood pulp nanofibrillation and nanofiber network characteristics. Biomacromolecules 9:1022–102610.1021/bm701157n ↗
15. Meredith R (1956) The mechanical properties of textile fibres. North-Holland, Amsterdam
16. Mörseburg K, Chinga-Carrasco G (2009) Assessing the combined benefits of clay and nanofibrillated cellulose in layered TMP-based sheets. Cellulose. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9290-410.1007/s10570-009-9290-4 ↗
17. Pääkkö M, Ankefors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8:1934–194110.1021/bm061215p ↗
18. Rasband WS (1997) ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/
19. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7(6):1687–169110.1021/bm060154s ↗
20. Syverud K, Stenius P (2009) Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 16(1):75–8510.1007/s10570-008-9244-2 ↗
21. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 37:815–827
22. Wågberg L, Decher G, Norgren M, Lindström T, Ankefors M, Axnäs K (2008) The build-up of polyelectrolyte multilayers of microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyelectrolytes. Langmuir 24:784–79510.1021/la702481v ↗
23. Yano H, Nakahara S (2004) Bio-composites produced from plant microfiber bundles with a nanometer unit web-like network. J Mater Sci 39:1635–163810.1023/B:JMSC.0000016162.43897.0a ↗