Nanosafety by design: risks from nanocomposite/nanowaste combustion
Source abstract
Abstract
Risks associated with the end-of-life of nanomaterials are an issue that needs to be addressed so that the public perception and opinion, with regard to these emerging technological products, can effectively be supported by experimental evidences. In order to find new ecological ways to treat nanoproducts at their end-of-life, a new home-made demonstrator system was setup at INERIS, specifically designed to perform burning tests, coupled to a differential thermal analyzer to monitor the combustion kinetics. To assess nanoobject release during combustion, a high-performance nanocomposite polymer commonly used in the automotive industry, namely the polymeric compound acrylonitrile butadiene styrene matrix mixed with 3 wt% of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) was tested. To assess the potential release of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) during the combustion with this tool, the particle size distribution in the fumes was measured using an electrical low pressure impactor, and CNTs were collected using an aspiration-based transmission electron microscopy grid sampler. One of primary objective of these preliminary tests described in this study consisted in validating whether CNT fibers can be released in the gas phase during the combustion of a polymeric matrix filled with CNTs. It was found indeed that MWCNT of about 12-nm diameter and 600-nm length can be released in the ambient environment during combustion of 3 % MWCNT ABS. Such information is critical to assess whether a nanoproduct can be deemed to be considered as 'nanosafe by design' in its risk assessment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fire dynamics and safety research · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Bethune DS, Klang CH, de Vries MS, Gorman G, Savoy R, Vazquez J, Beyers R (1993) Cobalt-catalysed growth of carbon nanotubes with single-atomic-layer walls. Nature 363:605–60710.1038/363605a0 ↗
2. Bouillard J, Vignes A, Dufaud O, Perrin L, Thomas D (2010) Ignition and explosion risks of nanopowders. J Hazard Mater 181(1–3):873–88010.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.094 ↗
3. Bouillard J, Frejafon E, R’mili B, Fleury D (2011) Device for the characterization of the particulate release from combustion or thermal constraints upon materials containing nano-objects. France, Patent French FR 2976078, European Patent EP 2530450
4. Breuer O, Sundararaj U (2004) Big returns from small fibers : a review of polymer/carbon nanotube composites. Polym Compos 25(6):630–64510.1002/pc.20058 ↗
5. Chen WX, Tu JP, Wang LY, Gan HY, Xu ZD, Zhang XB (2003) Tribological application of carbon nanotubes in a metal-based composite coating and composites. Carbon 41(2):215–22210.1016/S0008-6223(02)00265-8 ↗
6. Danafar F, Fakhru’l A, Salleh MAM, Biak DRA (2009) Fluidized bed catalytic chemical vapor deposition synthesis of carbon nanotubes—a review. Chem Eng J 155:37–4810.1016/j.cej.2009.07.052 ↗
7. Fleury D, Bomfim JAS, Vignes A, Girard C, Metz S, Munoz F, RMili B, Ustache A, Guiot A, Bouillard JX (2011a) Identification of the main exposure scenarios in the production of CNT–polymer nanocomposites by melt-moulding process. J Clean Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.009 , pp. 1–1510.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.009 ↗
8. Fleury DJ, Bomfim AS, Sébastien Metz, Jacques XB, Jean-Marc B (2011b) Nanoparticle risk management and cost evaluation: a general framework. J Phys 304:012084. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/304/1/012084
9. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–5810.1038/354056a0 ↗
10. Iijima S, Ichihashi T (1993) Single shell carbon nanotubes of 1 nm diameter. Nature 363:603–60510.1038/363603a0 ↗
11. ISO/TS-27687 (2008) “Nanotechnologies—Terminology and definitions for nano-objects—Nanoparticle, nanofibre and nanoplate”, International Standards Organization
12. Kashiwagi T (2004) Thermal and flammability properties of olypropylene/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Polymer 45:4227–423910.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.088 ↗
13. Kim M, Park Y-B, Okoli OI, Zhang C (2009) Processing, characterization, and modeling of carbon nanotube-reinforced multiscale composites. Compos Sci Technol 69:335–34210.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.019 ↗
14. Larachi FBK, Hamoudia S, Sayaria A (2001) Kinetics of carbon oxide evolution in temperature-programmed oxidation of carbonaceous laydown deposited on wet oxidation catalysts. Catal Today 64:163–17710.1016/S0920-5861(00)00521-6 ↗
15. Li J, Tong L, Fang Z, Gu A, Xu Z (2006) Thermal degradation behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polyamide 6 composites. Polym Degrad Stab 91:2046–205210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.02.001 ↗
16. Lin L, Deo MD, Hanson FV, Oblad G (1991) Nonisothermal analysis of the kinetics of the combustion of coked sand. Ind Eng Chem Res 30(8):1795–180110.1021/ie00056a016 ↗
17. Monthioux MKV (2006) Who should be given the credit for the discovery of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 44:1621–162310.1016/j.carbon.2006.03.019 ↗
18. Musee N (2011) Nanowastes and the environment: potential new waste management paradigm. Environ Int 37(1):112–12810.1016/j.envint.2010.08.005 ↗
19. Nyden MR, Haris RH, Kim YS, Davis RD, Marsh ND, Zammarano M (2010) Characterizing particle emissions from burning polymer nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 2010: Advanced Materials, CNTs, Particles, Films and Composites - Technical Proceedings of the 2010 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Expo, NSTI-Nanotech 2010, vol 1, pp 717–719
20. Paradise MGT (2007) Carbon nanotubes—production and industrial applications. Mater Des 28:1477–148910.1016/j.matdes.2006.03.008 ↗
21. Pötschke P (2002) Rheological behavior of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polycarbonate composites. Polymer 43:3247–325510.1016/S0032-3861(02)00151-9 ↗
22. Radushkevich L, Lukyanovich V (1952) O strukture ugleroda, obrazujucegosja pri termiceskom razlozenii okisi ugleroda na zeleznom kontakte (Carbon structure formed under thermal decomposition of carbon monoxide on iron). Zhur Fiz Khim (SoV J Phys Chem) 26:88–95
23. Slaoui SBT (2004) Etude expérimentale et modélisation de la cinétique de combustion du coke. Comp rendus chimie 7:547–55710.1016/j.crci.2004.01.010 ↗
24. Tia SBSC, Wibulswas P (1991) Thermogravimetric analysis of Thai lignite—II. char combustion kinetics. Energy Convers Manag 31(3):8
25. Treacy MMJ, Ebbesen TW, Gibson JM (1996) Exceptionally high Young’s modulus observed for individual carbon nanotubes. Lett Nat 381:678–68010.1038/381678a0 ↗
26. Vignes A, Dufaud O, Perrin L, Thomas D, Bouillard J, Janes A, Vallieres C (2009) Thermal ignition and self heating of carbon nanotubes: from thermokinetic study to process safety. Chem Eng Sci 64:4210–422110.1016/j.ces.2009.06.072 ↗
27. Wang X, Li Q, Xie J, Jin Z, Wang J, Li Y, Jiang K, Fan S (2009) Fabrication of ultralong and electrically uniform single-walled carbon nanotubes on clean substrates. Nano Lett 9:3137–314110.1021/nl901260b ↗
28. Wong EW, Sheehan PE, Lieber CM (1997) Nanobeam mechanics: elasticity, strength, and toughness of nanorods and nanotubes. Science 277:1971–197510.1126/science.277.5334.1971 ↗
29. Yang S, Castillejaa JR, Barrerab EV, Lozanoa K (2004) Thermal analysis of an acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene/SWNT composite. Polym Degrad Stab 83:383–38810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.08.002 ↗