Life cycle and nano-products: end-of-life assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding environmental impacts of nanomaterials necessitates analyzing the life cycle profile. The initial emphasis of nanomaterial life cycle studies has been on the environmental and health effects of nanoproducts during the production and usage stages. Analyzing the end-of-life (eol) stage of nanomaterials is also critical because significant impacts or benefits for the environment may arise at that particular stage. In this article, the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN) Consumer Products Inventory (CPI) model was used, which contains a relatively large and complete nanoproduct list (1,014) as of 2010. The consumer products have wide range of applications, such as clothing, sports goods, personal care products, medicine, as well as contributing to faster cars and planes, more powerful computers and satellites, better micro and nanochips, and long-lasting batteries. In order to understand the eol cycle concept, we allocated 1,014 nanoproducts into the nine end-of-life categories (e.g., recyclability, ingestion, absorption by skin/public sewer, public sewer, burning/landfill, landfill, air release, air release/public sewer, and other) based on probable final destinations of the nanoproducts. This article highlights the results of this preliminary assessment of end-of-life stage of nanoproducts. The largest potential eol fate was found to be recyclability, however little literature appears to have evolved around nanoproduct recycling. At lower frequency is dermal and ingestion human uptake and then landfill. Release to water and air are much lower potential eol fates for current nanoproducts. In addition, an analysis of nano-product categories with the largest number of products listed indicated that clothes, followed by dermal-related products and then sports equipment were the most represented in the PEN CPI (http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/browse/categories/2010).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Extraction and Separation Processes · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Allen D, Rosselot K (1997) Pollution prevention for chemical processes. Wiley, New York
2. Asmatulu R, Mahmud GA, Zhang B and Ahmed I (2010) Effects of UV light on water contact angles of nanocomposite coatings, SAMPE fall technical conference, Salt Lake City, Oct 11–14
3. Berube DM, Searson EM, Morton TS, Cummings CL (2010) Project on emerging nanotechnologies- consumer product inventory evaluated. Nanotechnol Law Bus 7:152–163
4. Department of Public Works Milwaukee (2010) Ideas for reusing or recycling other items. http://www.ci.mil.wi.us/mpw/divisions/operations/environmental/sanitation/recycling/RecyclingIdeas.htm . Accessed Feb 3 2010
5. Earth 911 (2010) Recycling 101. http://earth911.com/ . Accessed Feb 2, 2010
6. E-Frat (2011) Environmental fate and risk assessment tool, Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technical University, Houghton
7. FRS, Facility Registry System, www.epa.gov/enviro . Accessed 15 Dec 2011
8. Gungor A, Gupta SM (1998) Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey. Comput Ind Eng 36:811–85310.1016/S0360-8352(99)00167-9 ↗
9. Lloyd S, Lave LB (2003) Life cycle economic and environmental implications of using nanocomposites in automobiles. Environ Sci Technol 37:3458–346610.1021/es026023q ↗
10. Olapiriyakul S, Caudill RJ (2009) Thermodynamic analysis to assess the environmental impact of end-of-life recovery processing for nanotechnology products. Environ Sci Technol 43:8140–814610.1021/es9006614 ↗
11. Piotrowska GB, Golimowski J, Urban PL (2009) Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management. Waste Manage 29:2587–259510.1016/j.wasman.2009.04.001 ↗
12. Senjen R (2010) 700 nano-products on the market & no labels! http://safesunscreenguide.net/700-nanoproducts-market-no-labels . Accessed 1 Feb 2010
13. The League of Women Voters (1993) The garbage primer. Lyons & Burford, New York, pp 35–72
14. The Woodrow Wilson Center’s Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN) (2010) Consumer Products/Categories. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/browse/categories/ . Accessed 18 Feb 2010