journal article·2016-09Open access

Uptake of silver nanoparticles by monocytic THP-1 cells depends on particle size and presence of serum proteins

Katja Kettler, Christina Giannakou, Wim H. de Jong, A. Jan Hendriks, Petra Krystek

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 18· Issue 9

Abstract

Human health risks by silver nanoparticle (AgNP) exposure are likely to increase due to the increasing number of NP-containing products and demonstrated adverse effects in various cell lines. Unfortunately, results from (toxicity) studies are often based on exposure dose and are often measured only at a fixed time point. NP uptake kinetics and the time-dependent internal cellular concentration are often not considered. Macrophages are the first line of defense against invading foreign agents including NPs. How macrophages deal with the particles is essential for potential toxicity of the NPs. However, there is a considerable lack of uptake studies of particles in the nanometer range and macrophage-like cells. Therefore, uptake rates were determined over 24 h for three different AgNPs sizes (20, 50 and 75 nm) in medium with and without fetal calf serum. Non-toxic concentrations of 10 ng Ag/mL for monocytic THP-1 cells, representing realistic exposure concentration for short-term exposures, were chosen. The uptake of Ag was higher in medium without fetal calf serum and showed increasing uptake for decreasing NP sizes, both on NP mass and on number basis. Internal cellular concentrations reached roughly 32/10 %, 25/18 % and 21/15 % of the nominal concentration in the absence of fetal calf serum/with fetal calf serum for 20-, 50- and 75-nm NPs, respectively. Our research shows that uptake kinetics in macrophages differ for various NP sizes. To increase the understanding of the mechanism of NP toxicity in cells, the process of uptake (timing) should be considered.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Chithrani BD, Ghazani AA, Chan WCW (2006) Determining the Size and Shape Dependence of Gold Nanoparticle Uptake into Mammalian Cells. Nano Lett 6:662–66810.1021/nl052396o ↗
2. Christensen F, Johnston H, Stone V, Aitken R, Hankin S, Peters S, Aschberger K (2010) Nano-silver–feasibility and challenges for human health risk assessment based on open literature. Nanotoxicology 4:284–295. doi: 10.3109/1743539100369054910.3109/17435391003690549 ↗
3. Commission European (2011) Commission recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of nanomaterial (Text with EEA relevance). Brussels, Belgium
4. Conner SD, Schmid SL (2003) Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature 422:37–4410.1038/nature01451 ↗
5. Cosson P, Soldati T (2008) Eat, kill or die: when amoeba meets bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 11:271–27610.1016/j.mib.2008.05.005 ↗
6. Foldbjerg R, Olesen P, Hougaard M, Dang DA, Hoffmann HJ, Autrup H (2009) PVP-coated silver NP and silver ions induce ROS, apoptosis and necrosis in THP-1 monocytes. Toxicol Lett 190:156–163. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.07.00910.1016/j.toxlet.2009.07.009 ↗
7. Fröhlich E (2012) The role of surface charge in cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of medical nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed 7:5577–5591. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S3611110.2147/IJN.S36111 ↗
8. Gangwal S, Brown J, Wang A, Houck K, Dix D, Kavlock R, Hubal E (2011) Informing selection of nanomaterial concentrations for ToxCast in vitro testing based on occupational exposure potential. Environ Health Perspect 119:1539–1546. doi: 10.1289/ehp.110375010.1289/ehp.1103750 ↗
9. Haase A et al (2011) Toxicity of silver nanoparticles in human macrophages: uptake, intracellular distribution and cellular responses. J Phys: Conf Ser 304:012030. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/304/1/01203010.1088/1742-6596/304/1/012030 ↗
10. He C, Hu Y, Yin L, Tang C, Yin C (2010) Effects of particle size and surface charge on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Biomaterials 31:3657–366610.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.065 ↗
11. Hendren C, Lowry M, Grieger K, Money E, Johnston J, Wiesner M, Beaulieu S (2013) Modeling approaches for characterizing and evaluating environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials in support of risk-based decision making. Environ Sci Technol 47:1190–120510.1021/es302749u ↗
12. Ikada Y, Tabata Y (1986) Phagocytosis of bioactive microspheres. J Bioact Compatible Polym 1:32–4610.1177/088391158600100104 ↗
13. Jiang W, Kim BYS, Rutka JT, Chan WCW (2008) Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent. Nat Nanotechnol 3:145–15010.1038/nnano.2008.30 ↗
14. Kettler K, Veltman K, van de Meent D, van Wezel A, Hendriks AJ (2014) Cellular uptake of nanoparticles as determined by particle properties. experimental conditions, and cell type. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:481–492. doi: 10.1002/etc.247010.1002/etc.2470 ↗
15. Kettler K, Krystek P, Giannakou C, Hendriks AJ, Jong WHd (2016) Exploring the effect of silver nanoparticle size and medium composition on uptake into pulmonary epithelial 16HBE14o-cells. doi: 10.1007/s11051-016-3493-z10.1007/s11051-016-3493-z ↗
16. Kuhn DA, Vanhecke D, Michen B, Blank F, Gehr P, Petri-Fink A, Rothen-Rutishauser B (2014) Different endocytotic uptake mechanisms for nanoparticles in epithelial cells and macrophages. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5:1625–1636. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.5.17410.3762/bjnano.5.174 ↗
17. Lévy R, Shaheen U, Cesbron Y, Sée V (2010) Gold nanoparticles delivery in mammalian live cells: a critical review. Nano Rev. doi: 10.3402/nano.v1i0.488910.3402/nano.v1i0.4889 ↗
18. Lu F, Wu S-H, Hung Y, Mou C-Y (2009) Size effect on cell uptake in well-suspended, uniform mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Small 5:1408–1413. doi: 10.1002/smll.20090000510.1002/smll.200900005 ↗
19. Lunov O et al (2011) Differential uptake of functionalized polystyrene nanoparticles by human macrophages and a monocytic cell line. ACS Nano 5:1657–1669. doi: 10.1021/nn200075610.1021/nn2000756 ↗
20. Maynard A, Kuempel E (2005) Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health. J Nanopart Res 7:587–61410.1007/s11051-005-6770-9 ↗
21. Nagayama S, Ogawara K-I, Fukuoka Y, Higaki K, Kimura T (2007) Time-dependent changes in opsonin amount associated on nanoparticles alter their hepatic uptake characteristics. Int J Pharm 342:215–22110.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.04.036 ↗
22. Nowack B, Bucheli TD (2007) Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut 150:5–2210.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.006 ↗
23. Park MVDZ et al (2011) The effect of particle size on the cytotoxicity, inflammation, developmental toxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32:9810–9817. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.08510.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.085 ↗
24. Rejman J, Oberle V, Zuhorn IS, Hoekstra D (2004) Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Biochem J 377:159–16910.1042/bj20031253 ↗
25. Rosales C (2005) Mechanisms of phagocytosis. Springer, New York10.1007/978-0-387-28669-3 ↗
26. Sbarra AJ, Karnovsky ML (1959) The Biochemical Basis of Phagocytosis. J Biol Chem 243:1355–136210.1016/S0021-9258(18)70011-2 ↗
27. Singh RP, Ramarao P (2012) Cellular uptake, intracellular trafficking and cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles. Toxicol Lett 213:249–259. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.07.00910.1016/j.toxlet.2012.07.009 ↗
28. Tsai C, Lu S, Hu C, Yeh C, Lee G, Lei H (2012) Size-dependent attenuation of TLR9 signaling by gold nanoparticles in macrophages. J Immunol 188:68–76. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.110034410.4049/jimmunol.1100344 ↗
29. Vance ME, Kuiken T, Vejerano EP, McGinnis SP, Hochella MF Jr, Rejeski D, Hull MS (2015) Nanotechnology in the real world: redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 6:1769–178010.3762/bjnano.6.181 ↗
30. Vonarbourg A, Passirani C, Saulnier P, Simard P, Leroux JC, Benoit JP (2006) Evaluation of pegylated lipid nanocapsules versus complement system activation and macrophage uptake. J Biomed Mater Res 78:620–628. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.3071110.1002/jbm.a.30711 ↗
31. Walkey CD, Olsen JB, Guo H, Emili A, Chan WCW (2011) Nanoparticle size and surface chemistry determine serum protein adsorption and macrophage uptake. J Am Chem Soc 134:2139–2147. doi: 10.1021/ja208433810.1021/ja2084338 ↗
32. Wang S-H, Lee C-W, Chiou A, Wei P-K (2010) Size-dependent endocytosis of gold nanoparticles studied by three-dimensional mapping of plasmonic scattering images. J Nanobiotechnol. doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-8-3310.1186/1477-3155-8-33 ↗
33. Watts C, Marsh M (1992) Endocytosis: what goes in and how? J Cell Sci 103:1–810.1242/jcs.103.1.1a ↗
34. Yu S et al (2012) Size- and charge-dependent non-specific uptake of PEGylated nanoparticles by macrophages. Int J Nanomed 7:799–813. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S2853110.2147/IJN.S28531 ↗
35. Yue H, Wei W, Yue Z, Lv P, Wang L, Ma G, Su Z (2010) Particle size affects the cellular response in macrophages. Eur J Pharm Sci 41:650–657. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2010.09.00610.1016/j.ejps.2010.09.006 ↗
36. Zhu Z-J, Posati T, Moyano DF, Tang R, Yan B, Vachet RW, Rotello VM (2012) The interplay of monolayer structure and serum protein interactions on the cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles. Small. doi: 10.1002/smll.20120079410.1002/smll.201200794 ↗