journal article·2006-11-03

The North American opinion climate for nanotechnology and its products: Opportunities and challenges

Susanna Priest

Publisher page

Abstract

A January 2005 telephone survey of 1200 people in the U.S. and 2000 Canadians provides a snapshot of current North American opinion regarding nanotechnology at this crucial early point in its emergence from the laboratory to the arena of public discourse and public understanding. Using a typology of “publics” developed through analysis of a previous comparative survey (Priest, S., 2006) and subsequently tested against these newer data (Priest, S., 2005) this article describes the opinion climate for nanotechnology across North America. The comparison of key results from the two countries helps illustrate how social and cultural differences contribute to reactions to new technologies, including nanotech. The article also discusses implications for nanotechnology-related public outreach and risk communication efforts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Climate Change Communication and Perception · Risk Perception and Management · Environmental Education and Sustainability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (8)

Show source-provided references
1. Bishop G.F., 2004. The Illusion of Public Opinion: Fact and Artifact in American Public Opinion Polls. Rowman & Littlefield
2. Cobb M., and Macoubrie J. (2004). Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology. J. Nanoparticle Res. 6:395–40510.1007/s11051-004-3394-4 ↗
3. Gaskell G., Ten Eyck T., Jackson J.,Veltri G. (2005). Imagining nanotechnology: Cultural support for innovation in Europe and the United States. Public Underst. Sci. 14(1):81–9010.1177/0963662505048949 ↗
4. Priest S. (2001). Misplaced faith: Communication variables as predictors of encouragement for biotechnology development. Sci. commun. 23(2):97–11010.1177/1075547001023002002 ↗
5. Priest S., 2005. International audiences for news of emerging technologies: Canadian and U.S. responses to bio- and nanotechnologies. In First Impressions: Understanding the Public’s View of Emerging Technologies. Genome Prairie GE3LS Team, University of Calgary. Report prepared for Canadian Biotechnology Secretariat (September), pp. 77–87
6. Priest S., 2006. The public opinion climate for gene technologies in Canada and the United states: Competing voices, contrasting frames. Public Underst. Sci. 15(1), 55–7110.1177/0963662506052889 ↗
7. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, 2004. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (July)
8. Sturgis P., and Allum N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Underst. Sci. 13:55–7410.1177/0963662504042690 ↗