journal article·2019-11Open access

Inhalation exposure to various nanoparticles in work environment—contextual information and results of measurements

Przemyslaw Oberbek, Paweł Kozikowski, Katarzyna Czarnecka, Piotr Sobiech, Szymon Jakubiak, Tomasz Jankowski

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 21· Issue 11

Abstract

Abstract Outside the wide range of potential benefits, the use of nanomaterials can endanger human health, mostly through skin contact and the risk of inhalation. This article presents the results of harmonized measurements with contextual information on the emission of nanoparticles during the manufacturing and application of nanotechnology products. The purpose of the research was to investigate the actual levels of exposure to nano-objects in real working conditions in chosen Polish companies. Measurements were carried out in various workplaces: during silver nanoparticle synthesis, production of thin nanocarbon layers, 3D-printing with the use of a nanohydroxyapatite-polymer composite and the production of special seals from thin glass foils. Research was conducted on the basis of task-based measurements and offline microscopic analysis. Real-time particle DiSCmini counters were used to determine the nano-object concentration during different processes and events: samplers for collecting air dust, and a scanning electron microscope to confirm the presence of nanoparticles emitted from selected sources. Average particle sizes obtained with analysis of microscopic images were as follows: 46.7 ± 13.4 nm, 19.8 ± 4.8 nm, 22.4 ± 7.6 nm, 49.2 ± 26.3 nm respectively for workplaces. The concentration during significant events was referred to the background particle level. During one of the repeated processes, an unexpected and extremely high nanoparticle emission was recorded, which, in the long run, could cause a health hazard to workers. The studies have shown the importance of collective protective measures, revealed unexpected sources of accidentally generated nanoparticles and allowed to obtain knowledge about levels of exposure to nanoparticles during the various processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Air Quality and Health Impacts · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. ACGIH (2018) 2018 TLVs and BEIs. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
2. Al-Sid-Cheikh M, Rowland SJ, Stevenson K, Rouleau C, Henry TB, Thompson RC (2018) Uptake, whole-body distribution, and depuration of nanoplastics by the scallop Pecten maximus at environmentally realistic concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 52:14480–14486. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b0526610.1021/acs.est.8b05266 ↗
3. Branche CM (2009) Approaches to safe nanotechnology: managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication Number 2009–125
4. Broekhuizen P, Hendrikx B (2013) Nano reference values in the Netherlands vol 73
5. Brouwer D (2012) Control banding approaches for nanomaterials vol 56. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mes03910.1093/annhyg/mes039 ↗
6. Brouwer D, van Duuren-Stuurman B, Berges M, Jankowska E, Bard D, Mark DJJoNR (2009) From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects J Nanopart Res 11:1867 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9772-1 , 188110.1007/s11051-009-9772-1 ↗
7. Brouwer D et al (2013) Workplace air measurements and likelihood of exposure to manufactured nano-objects, agglomerates, and aggregates vol 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-2090-710.1007/s11051-013-2090-7 ↗
8. Brown DM, Wilson MR, MacNee W, Stone V, Donaldson K (2001) Size-dependent proinflammatory effects of ultrafine polystyrene particles: a role for surface area and oxidative stress in the enhanced activity of ultrafines. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 175:191–199. https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.2001.924010.1006/taap.2001.9240 ↗
9. BSI (2007) Guide to safe handling and disposal of manufactured nanomaterials. Nanotechnologies – part 2 vol PD 6699–2:2007. British Standards Institution
10. Buzea C, Pacheco II, Robbie K (2007) Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2:Mr17–Mr7110.1116/1.2815690 ↗
11. CEN (2018a) Workplace exposure - assessment of exposure by inhalation of nano-objects and their aggregates and agglomerates vol EN 17058:2018. European Committee for Standardization
12. CEN (2018b) Workplace exposure - measurement of exposure by inhalation of nano-objects and their aggregates and agglomerates - metrics to be used such as number concentration, surface area concentration and mass concentration vol EN 16966:2018
13. Cheng L-C, Jiang X, Wang J, Chen C, Liu R-S (2013) Nano-bio effects: interaction of nanomaterials with cells. Nanoscale 5:3547–3569. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR34276J10.1039/C3NR34276J ↗
14. Dastjerdi R, Montazer M (2010) A review on the application of inorganic nano-structured materials in the modification of textiles: focus on anti-microbial properties. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 79:5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.02910.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.029 ↗
15. De Jong WH, Borm PJA (2008) Drug delivery and nanoparticles:applications and hazards. Int J Nanomed 3:133–14910.2147/IJN.S596 ↗
16. Definition of a nanomaterial (2017) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/nanotech/faq/definition_en.htm
17. Deveau M et al (2015) The global landscape of occupational exposure limits—implementation of harmonization principles to guide limit selection. J Occup Environ Hyg 12:S127–S144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.106032710.1080/15459624.2015.1060327 ↗
18. DFG (2011) New threshold values for fine particulates at the workplace vol Press Release No. 37. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
19. Dolez PI (2015) Chapter 1.1 - Nanomaterials definitions, classifications, and applications. In: Dolez PI (ed) Nanoengineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00001-410.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00001-4 ↗
20. Dreaden EC, Austin LA, Mackey MA, El-Sayed MA (2012) Size matters: gold nanoparticles in targeted cancer drug delivery. Ther Deliv 3:457–47810.4155/tde.12.21 ↗
21. EC (2014) Guidance on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the potential risks related to nanomaterials at work. European Commission
22. Ellenbecker M, Tsai SJ, Jacobs M, Riediker M, Peters T, Liou S, Avila A, FossHansen S (2018) The difficulties in establishing an occupational exposure limit for carbon nanotubes. J Nanopart Res 20:131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4221-710.1007/s11051-018-4221-7 ↗
23. EU (2011) Commission recommendation of 18 October 2011on the definition of nanomaterial (2011/696/EU). Official Journal of the European Union
24. Fierz M, Houle C, Steigmeier P, Burtscher H (2011) Design, Calibration, and field performance of a miniature diffusion size classifier. Aerosol Sci Technol 45:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.51628310.1080/02786826.2010.516283 ↗
25. Firdhouse MJ, Lalitha P (2015) Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles and its applications. J Nanotechnol 2015:18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/82952610.1155/2015/829526 ↗
26. Gajanan K, Tijare SN (2018) Applications of nanomaterials. Mater Today Proc 5:1093–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.18710.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.187 ↗
27. Geiss O, Bianchi I, Barrero-Moreno J (2016) Lung-deposited surface area concentration measurements in selected occupational and non-occupational environments. J Aerosol Sci 96:24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.02.00710.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.02.007 ↗
28. Geza Benke MD, Priestly B, Sim M, Morris H (2010) Engineered nanomaterials: feasibility of establishing exposure standards and using control banding in Australia. Safe Work Australia’s Nanotechnology OHS Advisory Group, and Nanotechnology OHS Measurement Reference Group
29. Gomez V, Irusta S, Balas F, Navascues N, Santamaria J (2014) Unintended emission of nanoparticle aerosols during common laboratory handling operations. J Hazard Mater 279:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.06410.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.064 ↗
30. HEI (2013) Understanding the health effects of ambient ultrafine particles vol HEI perspective 3. Massachusetts, Boston
31. Helene Stockmann-Juvala PT, Santonen T (2014) Formulating occupational exposure limits values (OELls) (inhalation & dermal)
32. Heyder J (2004) Deposition of inhaled particles in the human respiratory tract and consequences for regional targeting in respiratory drug delivery. Proc Am Thorac Soc 1:315–320. https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.200409-046ta10.1513/pats.200409-046ta ↗
33. Heyder J, Gebhart J, Rudolf G, Schiller CF, Stahlhofen W (1986) Deposition of particles in the human respiratory tract in the size range 0.005–15 μm. J Aerosol Sci 17:811–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(86)90035-210.1016/0021-8502(86)90035-2 ↗
34. Hoet PHM, Brüske-Hohlfeld I, Salata OV (2004) Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks. J Nanobiotechnol 2:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-2-1210.1186/1477-3155-2-12 ↗
35. ICRP ICfRP (1994) Respiratory tract model vol 24. SAGE Publications Ltd 24:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6453(94)90004-310.1016/0146-6453(94)90004-3 ↗
36. ISO (2012a) ISO (2012) 13138:2012 air quality — sampling conventions for airborne particle deposition in the human respiratory system. International Standard Organization
37. ISO (2012b) ISO/TS 12901–1:2012 nanotechnologies – occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials – part 1: principles and approaches vol ISO/TS 12901–1:2012. International Standard Organization
38. ISO (2014) ISO/TS 12901–2:2014 nanotechnologies – occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials – part 2: used of the control banding approach vol ISO/TS 12901–2:2014. International Standard Organization
39. Jeevanandam J, Barhoum A, Chan YS, Dufresne A, Danquah MK (2018) Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulations. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 9:1050–1074. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.9810.3762/bjnano.9.98 ↗
40. Khanna P, Ong C, Bay BH, Baeg GH (2015) Nanotoxicity: an interplay of oxidative stress, inflammation and cell death. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 5:1163–1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano503116310.3390/nano5031163 ↗
41. Kumar P, Robins A, Vardoulakis S, Britter R (2010) A review of the characteristics of nanoparticles in the urban atmosphere and the prospects for developing regulatory controls. Atmos Environ 44:5035–5052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.01610.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.016 ↗
42. Kuuluvainen H et al (2016) Lung deposited surface area size distributions of particulate matter in different urban areas. Atmos Environ 136:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.01910.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.019 ↗
43. Lavoie JH (2010) A review of nanomaterial safety concerns. Process Saf Prog 29:182–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.1038810.1002/prs.10388 ↗
44. Ma-Hock L et al (2009) Inhalation toxicity of multiwall carbon nanotubes in rats exposed for 3 months. Toxicol Sci 112:468–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfp14610.1093/toxsci/kfp146 ↗
45. Mark D (2007) Chapter 4: Occupational exposure to nanoparticles and nanotubes. In: Nanotechnology: consequences for human health and the environment, vol 24. The Royal Society of Chemistry, pp 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781847557766-0005010.1039/9781847557766-00050 ↗
46. Maynard AD, Aitken RJ (2007) Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: current abilities and future requirements. Nanotoxicology 1:26–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743539070131472010.1080/17435390701314720 ↗
47. Mc Carthy D, Malhotra M, Aoife OM, Cryan J, O’Driscoll C (2015) Nanoparticles and the blood-brain barrier: advancing from in-vitro models towards therapeutic significance. Pharm Res 32:1161–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-014-1545-610.1007/s11095-014-1545-6 ↗
48. Mihalache R, Verbeek J, Graczyk H, Murashov V, van Broekhuizen P (2017) Occupational exposure limits for manufactured nanomaterials, a systematic review. Nanotoxicology 11:7–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2016.126292010.1080/17435390.2016.1262920 ↗
49. NECID (2018) http://www.perosh.eu/research-projects/perosh-projects/necid/
50. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.111439710.1126/science.1114397 ↗
51. NIOSH (2011) Approaches to safe nanotechnology: document provides guidance to protect nanotechnology workers. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2011-206/
52. NIOSH (2013) Occupational exposure to carbon nanotubes and nanofibers vol 65. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
53. Nogueira DR, Mitjans M, Rolim CMB, Vinardell MP (2014) Mechanisms underlying cytotoxicity induced by engineered nanomaterials: a review of in vitro studies. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 4:454–484. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano402045410.3390/nano4020454 ↗
54. O’Shaughnessy PT (2013) Occupational health risk to nanoparticulate exposure. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15:49–6210.1039/C2EM30631J ↗
55. Oberbek P (2018) NECID – nano exposure and contextual information database vol 35. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.101810.5604/01.3001.0012.1018 ↗
56. Oberdörster G, Ferin J, Gelein R, Soderholm SC, Finkelstein J (1992) Role of the alveolar macrophage in lung injury: studies with ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 97:193–199. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.97-151954110.1289/ehp.97-1519541 ↗
57. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–839. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.733910.1289/ehp.7339 ↗
58. OECD (2017) Strategies, techniques and sampling protocols for determining the concentrations of manufactured nanomaterials in air at the workplace, series on the safety of manufactured nanomaterials vol 82. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
59. Ono-Ogasawara M, Serita F, Takaya MJ (2009) Distinguishing nanomaterial particles from background airborne particulate matter for quantitative exposure assessment. J Nanopart Res 11:1651–1659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9703-110.1007/s11051-009-9703-1 ↗
60. Pauluhn J (2010a) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (Baytubes): approach for derivation of occupational exposure limit. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 57:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.12.01210.1016/j.yrtph.2009.12.012 ↗
61. Pauluhn J (2010b) Subchronic 13-week inhalation exposure of rats to multiwalled carbon nanotubes: toxic effects are determined by density of agglomerate structures, not fibrillar structures. Toxicol Sci 113:226–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfp24710.1093/toxsci/kfp247 ↗
62. Prasad R, Bhattacharyya A, Nguyen QD (2017) Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: recent developments, challenges, and perspectives. Front Microbiol 8:1014–1014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.0101410.3389/fmicb.2017.01014 ↗
63. Ramachandran G et al (2011) A strategy for assessing workplace exposures to nanomaterials. J Occup Environ Hyg 8:673–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2011.62322310.1080/15459624.2011.623223 ↗
64. Ramos AP, Cruz MAE, Tovani CB, Ciancaglini P (2017) Biomedical applications of nanotechnology. Biophys Rev 9:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-016-0246-210.1007/s12551-016-0246-2 ↗
65. Salata OV (2004) Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. J Nanobiotechnol 2:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-2-310.1186/1477-3155-2-3 ↗
66. SCENIHR (2007) The appropriateness of the risk assessment methodology in accordance with the Technical Guidance Documents for new and existing substances for assessing the risks of nanomaterials. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, European Commission, Brussels
67. Schulte PA, Murashov V, Zumwalde R, Kuempel ED, Geraci CL (2010) Occupational exposure limits for nanomaterials: state of the art. J Nanopart Res 12:1971–1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0008-110.1007/s11051-010-0008-1 ↗
68. Schumacher C, Pallapies D (2009) Criteria for assessment of the effectiveness of protective measures. IFA DGUV. https://www.dguv.de/ifa/fachinfos/nanopartikel-am-arbeitsplatz/beurteilung-von-schutzmassnahmen/index-2.jsp
69. Seipenbusch M, Binder A, Kasper G (2008) Temporal evolution of nanoparticle aerosols in workplace exposure vol 52. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/men06710.1093/annhyg/men067 ↗
70. Seixas NS, Sheppard L, Neitzel R (2003) Comparison of task-based estimates with full-shift measurements of noise exposure. AIHA J (Fairfax, VA) 64:823–829. https://doi.org/10.1202/524.110.1202/524.1 ↗
71. Simcha S, Dotan A, Kenig S, Dodiuk H (2012) Characterization of hybrid epoxy nanocomposites. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 2:348–365. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano204034810.3390/nano2040348 ↗
72. Singh S, Nalwa HS (2007) Nanotechnology and health safety--toxicity and risk assessments of nanostructured materials on human health. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 7:3048–307010.1166/jnn.2007.922 ↗
73. Sobot D, Mura S, Couvreur P (2014) Nanoparticles: blood components interactions. In: Kobayashi S, Müllen K (eds) Encyclopedia of polymeric nanomaterials. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36199-9_227-110.1007/978-3-642-36199-9_227-1 ↗
74. Świdwińska-Gajewska AM, Czerczak S (2014) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: occupational exposure limits. Med Pr 65:407–418. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.2014.04610.13075/mp.5893.2014.046 ↗
75. Świdwińska-Gajewska AM, Czerczak S (2015) Nanosilver – occupational exposure limits. Med Pr 66:429–442. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.0017710.13075/mp.5893.00177 ↗
76. Terentyuk G (2009) Tracking gold nanoparticles in the body. https://doi.org/10.1117/2.1200907.161910.1117/2.1200907.1619 ↗
77. van Broekhuizen P, van Veelen W, Streekstra WH, Schulte P, Reijnders L (2012) Exposure limits for nanoparticles: report of an international workshop on nano reference values. Ann Occup Hyg 56:515–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mes04310.1093/annhyg/mes043 ↗
78. Waseda Y, Muramatsu A (2013) Morphology control of materials and nanoparticles: advanced materials processing and characterization. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
79. WHO (2017) WHO Guidelines on protecting workers from potential risks of manufactured nanomaterials
80. Xie W, Weidenkaff A, Tang X, Zhang Q, Poon J, Tritt TM (2012) Recent advances in nanostructured thermoelectric half-Heusler compounds. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 2:379–412. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano204037910.3390/nano2040379 ↗
81. Zhang Z, Zhang L, Hedhili MN, Zhang H, Wang P (2013) Plasmonic gold nanocrystals coupled with photonic crystal seamlessly on TiO2 nanotube photoelectrodes for efficient visible light photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Lett 13:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl302920210.1021/nl3029202 ↗