Redefining risk research priorities for nanomaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
Chemical-based risk assessment underpins the current approach to responsible development of nanomaterials (NM). It is now recognised, however, that this process may take decades, leaving decision makers with little support in the near term. Despite this, current and near future research efforts are largely directed at establishing (eco)toxicological and exposure data for NM, and comparatively little research has been undertaken on tools or approaches that may facilitate near-term decisions, some of which we briefly outline in this analysis. We propose a reprioritisation of NM risk research efforts to redress this imbalance, including the development of more adaptive risk governance frameworks, alternative/complementary tools to risk assessment, and health and environment surveillance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Air Quality and Health Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Aguar P, Murcia Nicolás JJ (2008) EU nanotechnology R&D in the field of health and environmental impact of nanoparticles. European Commission, January 28. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/final-version.pdf
2. Aitken R, Hankin S, Ross B, Tran CL, Stone V, Fernandes TF, Donaldson K, Duffin R, Chaudhry Q, Wilkins TA, Wilkins SA, Levy LS, Rocks SA, Maynard A (2009) EMERGNANO: a review of completed and near completed environmental, health and safety research on nanomaterials and nanotechnology. UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), March. http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=CB0409_7910_FRP.pdf
3. Baun A, Hansen SF (2008) Environmental challenges for nanomedicine. Nanomedicine 3:605–60810.2217/17435889.3.5.605 ↗
4. Baun A, Hartmann N, Grieger K, Hansen SF (2009) Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters. J Environ Monit 11:1774–178110.1039/b909730a ↗
5. Brown S (2009) The new deficit model. Nat Nanotechnol 4:609–61110.1038/nnano.2009.278 ↗
6. Choi J, Ramachandran G, Kandlikar M (2009) The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. Environ Sci Technol 43:3030–303410.1021/es802388s ↗
7. Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. Frances Pinter, London
8. Crane M, Handy R, Garrod J, Owen R (2008) Ecotoxicity test methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17:421–43710.1007/s10646-008-0215-z ↗
9. Davis JM (2007) How to assess the risks of nanotechnology: learning from past experience. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 7:402–40910.1166/jnn.2007.152 ↗
10. DEFRA (2006) Characterising the potential risks posed by engineered nanoparticles. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/nanotech/research/pdf/nanoparticlesprogressreport.pdf
11. DEFRA (2007) Characterising the potential risks posed by engineered nanoparticles—second UK government research report. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/nanotech/research/pdf/nanoparticles-riskreport07.pdf
12. Elder A, Lynch I, Grieger K, Chan-Remillard S, Gatti A, Gnewuch H, Kenawy E, Korenstein R, Kuhlbusch T, Linker F, Matias S, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Pinto VR, Rudnitsky R, Savolainen A, Shvedova A (2009) Human health risks of engineered nanomaterials: critical knowledge gaps in nanomaterials risk assessment. In: Linkov I, Steevens JA (eds) Nanomaterials: risks and benefits. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–3010.1007/978-1-4020-9491-0_1 ↗
13. Environment Agency (2008) Interim advice on wastes containing unbound carbon nanotubes. http://www.nerc.ac.uk/research/programmes/nanoscience/events/documents/nano-waste.pdf
14. Environmental Defense, DuPont (2007) Nano Risk Framework. http://www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/6496_Nano%20Risk%20Framework.pdf
15. EPA (2009) Nanomaterial research strategy. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/nanoscience/files/nanotech_research_strategy_final.pdf
16. European Commission (2000) Communication from the commission on the precautionary principle. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf
17. European Commission (2003) Technical guidance document on risk assessment—part I. http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/Documents/TECHNICAL_GUIDANCE_DOCUMENT/EDITION_2/tgdpart1_2ed.pdf
18. European Commission (2005) Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: an action plan for Europe 2005–2009. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/action_plan_brochure.pdf
19. European Commission (2008a) Commission recommendation of 07/02/2008 on a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research. http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nanocode-rec_pe0894c_en.pdf
20. European Commission (2008b) Follow-up to the 6th meeting of the REACH competent authorities for the implementation of regulation (EC) 1907/2006 (REACH), 15–16 December 2008. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/pdf/nanomaterials.pdf
21. European Commission (2009) Work programme 2010 cooperation theme 4, nanosciences, nanotechnologies, materials and new production technologies—NMP. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/dc/index.cfm?fuseaction=UserSite.FP7DetailsCallPage&call_id=258#infopack
22. European Food Safety Authority (2009) Scientific opinion: the potential risks arising from nanoscience and nanotechnologies on food and feed safety. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/Scientific_Opinion/sc_op_ej958_nano_en.pdf?ssbinary=true
23. Grieger K, Hansen SF, Baun A (2009) The known unknowns of nanomaterials: describing and characterizing uncertainty within environmental, health and safety risks. Nanotoxicology 3:1–1210.1080/17435390902944069 ↗
24. Guston DH, Sarewitz D (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24:93–10910.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1 ↗
25. Handy RD, Owen R, Valsami-Jones E (2008) The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs. Ecotoxicology 17:315–32510.1007/s10646-008-0206-0 ↗
26. Hansen SF (2009) Regulation and risk assessment of nanomaterials: too little, too late? PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark
27. Hansen SF, Michelson ES, Kamper A, Borling P, Stuer Lauridsen F, Baun A (2008) Categorization framework to aid exposure assessment of nanomaterials in consumer products. Ecotoxicology 17:438–44710.1007/s10646-008-0210-4 ↗
28. Hanssen L, Walhout B, van Est R (2008) Ten lessons for a nanodialogue: the Dutch debate about nanotechnology thus far. Rathenau Institute. http://www.rathenauinstituut.com/downloadfile.asp?ID=1486
29. Hassellov M, Readman JW, Ranville JF, Tiede K (2008) Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17:344–36110.1007/s10646-008-0225-x ↗
30. Höck J, Hofmann H, Krug H, Lorenz C, Limbach L, Nowack B, Riediker M, Schischke K, Som C, Stark W, Studer C, von Götz N, Wengert S, Wick P (2008) Guidelines on the Precautionary Matrix for synthetic nanomaterials. Federal Office for Public Health and Federal Office for the Environment. http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/chemikalien/00228/00510/05626/index.html?lang=en&download=M3wBPgDB/8ull6Du36WenojQ1NTTjaXZnqWfVp3Uhmfhnapmmc7Zi6rZnqCkkId3fH2DbKbXrZ6lhuDZz8mMps2gpKfo
31. ICON (2008) Towards predicting nano-biointeractions: an international assessment of nanotechnology environment, health and safety research needs. International Council on Nanotechnology, May 1. http://cohesion.rice.edu/CentersAndInst/ICON/emplibrary/ICON_RNA_Report_Exec_Summ2.pdf
32. IRGC (2007) Nanotechnology risk governance: recommendations for a global, coordinated approach to the governance of potential risks. International Risk Governance Council http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/PB_nanoFINAL2_2_.pdf
33. ISO (2008a) International workshop on documentary standards for measurement and characterization in nanotechnologies, NIST, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA 26–28 February 2008. International Organization for Standardization, June. http://www.standardsinfo.net/info/livelink/fetch/2000/148478/7746082/assets/final_report.pdf
34. ISO (2008b) Spécification technique internationale nanotechnologies—terminology and definitions for nano-objects—nanoparticle, nanofibre and nanoplate. International Organization for Standardization. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=44278
35. Lee R, Jose PD (2008) Self-interest, self-restraint and corporate responsibility for nanotechnologies: emerging dilemmas for modern managers. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 20:113–12610.1080/09537320701726775 ↗
36. Limbach LK, Bereiter R, Müller E, Krebs R, Gälli R, Stark WJ (2008) Removal of oxide nanoparticles in a model wastewater treatment plant: influence of agglomeration and surfactants on clearing efficiency. Environ Sci Technol 42:5828–583310.1021/es800091f ↗
37. Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Steevens J, Ferguson E, Pleus RC (2007) Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 9:543–55410.1007/s11051-007-9211-0 ↗
38. Linkov I, Steevens J, Adlakha-Hutcheon G, Bennett E, Chappell M, Colvin V, Davis JM, Davis T, Elder A, Hansen SF, Hakkinen PB, Hussain SM, Karkan D, Korenstein R, Lynch I, Metcalfe C, Ramadan AB, Satterstrom FK (2009a) Emerging methods and tools for environmental risk assessment, decision-making, and policy for nanomaterials: summary of NATO advanced research workshop. J Nanopart Res 11:513–52710.1007/s11051-008-9514-9 ↗
39. Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Monica JC, Hansen SF, Davis T (2009b) Nano risk governance: current developments and future perspectives. Nanotechnol Law Bus 6:203–220
40. Mantovani E, Porcari A, Meili C, Widmer M (2009) Mapping study on regulation and governance of nanotechnologies. FramingNano, January. http://www.framingnano.eu/images/stories/FramingNanoMappingStudyFinal.pdf
41. Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdorster G, Philbert MA, Ryan J, Seaton A, Stone V, Tinkle SS, Tran L, Walker NJ, Warheit DB (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444:267–26910.1038/444267a ↗
42. Metcalfe C, Bennett E, Chappell MA, Steevens JA, Depledge M, Goss G, Goudey S, Kaczmar S, O’Brien N, Picado A (2009) SMARTEN: strategic management and assessment of risks and toxicity of engineered nanomaterials. In: Linkov I, Steevens JA (eds) Nanomaterials: risks and benefits. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 95–10910.1007/978-1-4020-9491-0_7 ↗
43. Morgan K (2005) Development of a preliminary framework for informing the risk analysis and risk management of nanoparticles. Risk Anal 25:1621–163510.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00681.x ↗
44. Nasterlack M, Zober A, Oberlinner C (2008) Considerations on occupational medical surveillance in employees handling nanoparticles. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81:721–72610.1007/s00420-007-0245-5 ↗
45. NIOSH (2009) Approaches to safe nanotechnology: managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, March. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2009-125/
46. NNI (2008a) FY budget & highlights. National Nanotechnology Initiative. http://www.nano.gov/NNI_FY09_budget_summary.pdf
47. NNI (2008b) Strategy for nanotechnology-related environmental, health and safety research. National Nanotechnology Initiative, February. http://www.nano.gov/NNI_EHS_Research_Strategy.pdf
48. OECD (2008a) Current developments/activities on the safety of manufactured nanomaterials: Tour de table at the 4th meeting of the working party on manufactured nanomaterials, 11–13 June 2008. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2008doc.nsf/linkto/envjm-mono(2008)29
49. OECD (2008b) List of manufactured nanomaterials and list of endpoints for phase one of the OECD testing programme. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, July 7. http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2008doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT000034C6/$FILE/JT03248749.PDF
50. OECD (2009a) Endocrine disrupter testing and assessment. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/document/62/0,2340,en_2649_34377_2348606_1_1_1_1,00.html
51. OECD (2009b) OECD guidance document for the diagnosis of endocrine-related histopathology of fish gonads. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, January 7. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/27/42140701.pdf
52. OECD (2009c) Preliminary analysis of exposure measurement and exposure mitigation in occupational settings: manufactured nanomaterials. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, April 17. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/36/36/42594202.pdf
53. OECD (2009d) Safety of manufactured nanomaterials. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/department/0,3355,en_2649_37015404_1_1_1_1_1,00.html
54. OECD (2009e) Preliminary review of OECD test guidelines for their applicability to manufactured nanomaterials. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, July 10. http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2009doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT000049AE/$FILE/JT03267900.PDF
55. Owen R, Handy R (2007) Formulating the problems for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 41:5582–558810.1021/es072598h ↗
56. Owen R, Baxter D, Maynard T, Depledge M (2009a) Beyond regulation: risk pricing and responsible innovation. Environ Sci Technol. doi:10.1021/es803332u10.1021/es803332u ↗
57. Owen R, Crane M, Grieger K, Handy R, Linkov I, Depledge M (2009b) Strategic approach for the management of environmental risk uncertainties posed by nanomaterials. In: Linkov I, Steevens JA (eds) Nanomaterials: risks and benefits. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 369–38410.1007/978-1-4020-9491-0_29 ↗
58. Powell MC, Griffin MP, Tai S (2008) Bottom-up risk regulation? How nanotechnology risk knowledge gaps challenge federal and state environmental agencies. Environ Manag 42:426–44310.1007/s00267-008-9129-z ↗
59. Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (2008) An inventory of nanotechnology-based consumer products currently on the market. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/. Accessed 30 June 2009
60. RCEP (2008) Novel materials in the environment: the case of nanotechnology. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, November. http://www.officialdocuments.gov.uk/document/cm74/7468/7468.pdf
61. Renn O (2008) Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, London10.1007/978-1-4020-6799-0 ↗
62. Rocks S, Pollard S, Dorey R, Levy L, Harrison P, Handy R (2008) Comparison of risk assessment approaches for manufactured nanomaterials. Department for environment, food and rural affairs, May 30. http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=CB0403_7306_ABS.doc
63. Saunders P, Mohammed M (2009) Environmental public health tracking: piloting methods for surveillance of environmentally related diseases in England and Wales. Environ Geochem Health 31:309–31310.1007/s10653-008-9216-3 ↗
64. SCENIHR (2007) The appropriateness of the risk assessment methodology in accordance with the Technical Guidance Documents for new and existing substances for assessing the risks of nanomaterials. European Commission, Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, June 21–22. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_010.pdf
65. SCENIHR (2009) Risk assessment of products of nanotechnologies. European Commission, Scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks, January 19. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_023.pdf
66. Schulte P, Geraci C, Schubauer-Berigan M, Zumwalde R, Mayweather C, McKernan J (2009) Issues in the development of epidemiologic studies of workers exposed to engineered nanoparticles. J Occup Environ Med 51:323–33510.1097/JOM.0b013e3181990c2c ↗
67. Shatkin JA (2008) Informing environmental decision making by combining life cycle assessment and risk analysis. J Ind Ecol 12:278–28110.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00031.x ↗
68. Stebbing M (2009) Avoiding the trust deficit: public engagement, values, the precautionary principle and the future of nanotechnology. J Bioeth Inq 6:37–4810.1007/s11673-009-9142-9 ↗
69. Sumpter JP, Johnson AC (2008) 10th anniversary perspective: Reflections on endocrine disruption in the aquatic environment: from known knowns to unknown unknowns (and many things in between). J Environ Monit 10:1476–148510.1039/b815741n ↗
70. Tervonen T, Linkov I, Figueira JR, Steevens J, Chappell M, Merad M (2009) Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 11:757–76610.1007/s11051-008-9546-1 ↗
71. Wiesner MR, Lowry GV, Jones KL, Hochella MF, Di Giulio RT, Casman E, Bernhardt E (2009) Decreasing uncertainties in assessing environmental exposure, risk, and ecological implications of nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol. doi:10.1021/es803621k10.1021/es803621k ↗