journal article·2018-04

Characterization challenges for a cellulose nanocrystal reference material: dispersion and particle size distributions

Zygmunt J. Jakubek, Maohui Chen, Martin Couillard, Tianyang Leng, Leslie Liu, Shan Zou, Ulrich Baxa, Jeffrey D. Clogston, Wadood Y. Hamad, Linda J. Johnston

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 20· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) have high aspect ratios, polydisperse size distributions, and a strong propensity for aggregation, all of which make them a challenging material for detailed size and morphology characterization. A CNC reference material produced by sulfuric acid hydrolysis of softwood pulp was characterized using a combination of dynamic light scattering (DLS), atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction. As a starting point, a dispersion protocol using ultrasonication was developed to provide CNC suspensions with reproducible size distributions as assessed by DLS. Tests of various methods for AFM sample preparation demonstrated that spin coating on a positively charged substrate maximizes the number of individual particles for size analysis, while minimizing the presence of agglomerates. The effects of sample-to-sample variability, analyst bias, and sonication on size distributions were assessed by AFM. The latter experiment indicated that dispersion of agglomerates by sonication did not significantly change the size distribution of individual CNCs in suspension. Comparison with TEM data demonstrated that the two microscopy methods provide similar results for CNC length (mean ~ 80 nm); however, the particle width as measured by TEM is approximately twice that of the CNC height (mean 3.5 nm) measured by AFM. The individual crystallite size measured by X-ray diffraction is intermediate between the two values, although closer to the AFM height, possibly indicating that laterally agglomerated CNCs contribute to the TEM width. Overall, this study provides detailed information that can be used to assess the factors that must be considered in measuring CNC size distributions, information that will be useful for benchmarking the performance of different industrially sourced materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Babick F, Mielke J, Wohlleben W, Weigel S, Hodoroaba V-D (2016) How reliably can a material be classified as a nanomaterial? Available particle sizing techniques at work. J Nanopart Res 18:15810.1007/s11051-016-3461-7 ↗
2. Beck S, Bouchard J, Berry R (2011) Controlling the reflection wavelength of iridescent solid films of nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 12:167–17210.1021/bm1010905 ↗
3. Beck S, Bouchard J, Berry R (2012) Dispersibility in water of dried nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 13:1486–149410.1021/bm300191k ↗
4. Bonevich JE, Haller WK (2010) Measuring the size of nanoparticles using transmission electron microscopy. NIST-NCL Joint Assay Protocol, PCC-7, Washington, DC
5. Brinkmann A, Chen M, Couillard M, Jakubek ZJ, Leng T, Johnston LJ (2016) Correlating cellulose nanocrystal particle size and surface area. Langmuir 32:6105–611410.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01376 ↗
6. Cherhal F, Cousin F, Capron I (2015) Influence of charge density and ionic strength on the aggregation process of cellulose nanocrystals in aqueous suspension, as revealed by small-angle neutron scattering. Langmuir 31:5596–560210.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00851 ↗
7. Davis CS, Moon RJ, Ireland S, Foster EJ, Johnston LJ, Shatkin JA, Nelson K, Forster AM, Postek MT, Vladar AE, Gilman JW (2015) NIST-TAPPI workshop on measurement needs for cellulose nanomaterials. NIST Special Publication #1192. doi: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.119210.6028/NIST.SP.1192 ↗
8. De Temmerman P-J, Lammertyn J, De Ketelare B, Kestens V, Roebben G, Verleysen E, Mast J (2014) Measurement uncertainties of size, shape, and surface measurements using transmission electron microscopy of near-monodisperse, near-spherical nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 16:217710.1007/s11051-013-2177-1 ↗
9. Delvallee A, Feltin N, Ducourtieux S, Trabelsi M, Hochepied JF (2016) Toward an uncertainty budget for measuring nanoparticles by AFM. Metrologia 53:41–5010.1088/0026-1394/53/1/41 ↗
10. Dufresne A (2013) Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today 16:220–22710.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004 ↗
11. Eichhorn S (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 7:303–31510.1039/C0SM00142B ↗
12. Elazzouzi-Hafraoui S, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J-L, Heux L, Dubreuilf F, Rochas C (2008) The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 9:57–6510.1021/bm700769p ↗
13. Grulke EA, Yamamoto K, Kumagi K, Hausler I, Osterle W, Ortel E, Hodoroaba V-D, Brown SC, Chan C, Zheng J, Yamamoto K, Yashiki K, Song NW, Kim YH, Stefaniak AB, Schwegler-Berry D, Coleman VA, Jamting AK, Hermann J, Arakawa T, Burchett WW, Lambert JW, Stromberg AJ (2017) Size and shape distributions of primary crystallites in titania aggregates. Adv Powder Technol 28:1647–165910.1016/j.apt.2017.03.027 ↗
14. Guan X, Cueto R, Russo P, Qi Y, Wu Q (2012) Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation with multiangle light scattering detection for characterization of cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 13:2671–267910.1021/bm300595a ↗
15. Hamad WY, Hu TQ (2010) Structure-property-yield inter-relationships in nanocrystalline cellulose extraction. Can J Chem Eng 88:392–40210.1002/cjce.20298 ↗
16. Hoo CM, Doan T, Starostin N, West PE (2010) Optimal sample preparation for nanoparticle metrology (statistical size measurements) using atomic force microscopy. J Nanopart Res 12:939–94910.1007/s11051-009-9644-8 ↗
17. Hu Y, Abidi N (2016) Distinct nematic self-assembling behavior caused by different size-unified cellulose nanocrystals via a multistage separation. Langmuir 32:9863–987210.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02861 ↗
18. ISO (19716:2016) Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals
19. Jiang F, Esker AR, Roman M (2010) Acid-catalyzed and solvolytic desulfation of H2SO4-hydrolyzed cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 26:17919–1792510.1021/la1028405 ↗
20. Kaushik M, Chen WC, van de Ven TGM, Moore A (2014) An improved methodology for imaging cellulose nanocrystals by transmission electron microscopy. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:77–8410.3183/NPPRJ-2014-29-01-p077-084 ↗
21. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50:5438–546610.1002/anie.201001273 ↗
22. Kovacs T, Naishi V, O’Connor B, Blaise C, Gagnez F, Hall L, Trudeau V, Martel P (2010) An ecotoxicological characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC). Nanotoxicology 4:255–27010.3109/17435391003628713 ↗
23. Meli F, Klein T, Buhr E, Frase CG, Gleber G, Krumrey M, Duta A, Duta S, Korpelainen V, Bellotti R, Picotto GB, Boyd RD, Cuenat A (2012) Traceable size determination of nanoparticles, a comparison among European Metrology Institutes. Meas Sci Technol 23:12500510.1088/0957-0233/23/12/125005 ↗
24. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–399410.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
25. Mukerjee A, Hackley VA (2017) Separation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals by multi-detector asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation. Analyst 143:731–74010.1039/C7AN01739A ↗
26. Postek MT, Vladar A, Dagata J, Farkas N, Ming B, Wagner R, Raman A, Moon RJ, Sabo R, Wegner TH, Beecher J (2011) Development of the metrology and imaging of cellulose nanocrystals. Meas Sci Technol 22:02400510.1088/0957-0233/22/2/024005 ↗
27. Reid MS, Villalobos M, Cranston ED (2017) Benchmarking cellulose nanocrystals: from the laboratory to industrial production. Langmuir 33:1583–159810.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765 ↗
28. Rice SB, Chan C, Brown SC, Eschbach P, Han L, Esnor DS, Stefaniak AB, Bonevich J, Vladar AE, Hight Walker AR, Zheng J, Starnes C, Stromberg A, Ye J, Grulke EA (2013) Particle size distributions by transmission electron microscopy: an interlaboratory comparison case study. Metrologia 50:663–67810.1088/0026-1394/50/6/663 ↗
29. Shafiei-Sabet S, Hamad WY, Hatzikiriakos SG (2012) Rheology of nanocrystalline cellulose aqueous suspensions. Langmuir 28:17124–1713310.1021/la303380v ↗
30. Shatkin JA, Kim B (2015) Cellulose nanomaterials: life cycle risk assessment and environmental health and safety roadmap. Environ Sci Nano 2:477–49910.1039/C5EN00059A ↗
31. Shatkin JA, Wegner TH, Bilek EM, Cowie J (2014) Market projections of cellulose nanomaterial-enabled products—part 1: applications. TAPPI J 13:9–1610.32964/TJ13.5.9 ↗
32. Taurozzi JS, Hackley VA, Wiesner MR (2011) Ultrasonic dispersion of nanoparticles for environmental, health and safety assessment—issues and recommendations. Nanotoxicology 5:711–72910.3109/17435390.2010.528846 ↗
33. Trache D, Hussin MH, Haafiz MKM, Thakur VK (2017) Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: sources and production. Nanoscale 9:1763–178610.1039/C6NR09494E ↗
34. Uhlig M, Fall A, Wellert S, Lehmann M, Prévost S, Wågberg L, von Klitzing R, Nyström G (2016) Two-dimensional aggregation and semidilute ordering in cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 32:442–45010.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04008 ↗