Characterization of exposure to silver nanoparticles in a manufacturing facility
Source abstract
Abstract
An assessment of the extent of exposure to nanomaterials in the workplace will be helpful in improving the occupational safety of workers. It is essential that the exposure data in the workplace are concerned with risk management to evaluate and reduce worker exposure. In a manufacturing facility dealing with nanomaterials, some exposure data for gas-phase reactions are available, but much less information is available regarding liquid-phase reactions. Although the potential for inhaling nanomaterials in a liquid-phase process is less than that for gas-phase, the risks of exposure during wet-chemistry processes are not negligible. In this study, we monitored and analyzed the exposure characteristics of silver nanoparticles during a liquid-phase process in a commercial production facility. Based on the measured exposure data, the source of Ag nanoparticles emitted during the production processes was indentified and a mechanism for the growth of Ag nanoparticle released is proposed. The data reported in this study could be used to establish occupational safety guidelines in the nanotechnology workplace, especially in a liquid-phase production facility.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Chemical Safety and Risk Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Helland A, Scheringer M, Siegrist M, Kastenholz HG, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2008) Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a survey of industrial approaches. Environ Sci Technol 42:640–64610.1021/es062807i ↗
2. Hinds WC (1999) Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
3. Huang F, Zhang H, Banfield JF (2003) Two-stage crystal-growth kinetics observed during hydrothermal coarsening of nanocrystalline ZnS. Nano Lett 3:373–37810.1021/nl025836+ ↗
4. Kreyling WG, Semmler M, Erbe F, Mayer P, Takenaka S, Schulz H, Oberdörster G, Ziesenis AJ (2002) Translocation of ultrafine insoluble iridium particles from lung epithelium to extrapulmonary organs is size dependent but very low. J Toxicol Environ Health 65:1513–153010.1080/00984100290071649 ↗
5. Maynard AD, Kuempel ED (2005) Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health. J Nanopart Res 7:587–61410.1007/s11051-005-6770-9 ↗
6. Oberdörster G, Celein RM, Ferin J, Weiss B (1995) Association of particulate air pollution and acute mortality: involvement of ultrafine particles. Inhal Toxicol 7:111–12410.3109/08958379509014275 ↗
7. Park J, Kim Y (2008) Effect of shape of silver nanoparticles on the enhancement of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) signals. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8:1–410.1166/jnn.2008.N03 ↗
8. Park J, Lee E, Hwang NM, Kang M, Kim SC, Hwang Y, Park JG, Noh HJ, Kim JY, Park JH, Hyeon T (2005) One-nanometer-scale size-controlled synthesis of monodisperse magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:2872–287710.1002/anie.200461665 ↗
9. Schmidt CW (2009) Nanotechnology-related EHS research. Environ Health Perspect 117:A158–A161
10. Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (1998) Atmospheric chemistry and physics. Wiley, New York
11. Tsai SJC, Ada E, Isaacs JA, Ellenbecker MJ (2009) Airborne nanoparticle exposures associated with the manual handling of nanoalumina and nanosilver in fume hoods. J Nanopart Res 11:147–16110.1007/s11051-008-9459-z ↗
12. Yun HJ, Lee H, Kim ND, Yi J (2008) Characterization of photocatalytic performance of silver deposited TiO2 nanorods. Electrochem Commun 11:363–36610.1016/j.elecom.2008.11.044 ↗