journal article·2009-02Open access

Nanotoxicology: characterizing the scientific literature, 2000–2007

Alexis D. Ostrowski, Tyronne Martin, Joseph Conti, Indy Hurt, Barbara Herr Harthorn

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 11· Issue 2

Abstract

Understanding the toxicity of nanomaterials and nano-enabled products is important for human and environmental health and safety as well as public acceptance. Assessing the state of knowledge about nanotoxicology is an important step in promoting comprehensive understanding of the health and environmental implications of these new materials. To this end, we employed bibliometric techniques to characterize the prevalence and distribution of the current scientific literature. We found that the nano-toxicological literature is dispersed across a range of disciplines and sub-fields; focused on in vitro testing; often does not specify an exposure pathway; and tends to emphasize acute toxicity and mortality rather than chronic exposure and morbidity. Finally, there is very little research on consumer products, particularly on their environmental fate, and most research is on the toxicity of basic nanomaterials. The implications for toxicologists, regulators and social scientists studying nanotechnology and society are discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management · Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (9)

Show source-provided references
1. Buzea C, Pacheco II, Robbie K (2007) Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2:MR17–MR7110.1116/1.2815690 ↗
2. Conti JA, Killpack K, Gerritzen G, Huang L, Mircheva M, Delmas M, Harthorn BH, Appelbaum RP, Holden PA (2008) Health and safety practices in the nanomaterials workplace: results from an international survey. Environ Sci Technol 42:3155–3162. doi:10.1021/es702158q10.1021/es702158q ↗
3. Fischer HC, Chan WCW (2007) Nanotoxicity: the growing need for in vivo study. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:565–571. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2007.11.00810.1016/j.copbio.2007.11.008 ↗
4. Hutchison JE (2008) Greener nanoscience: a proactive approach to advancing applications and reducing implications of nanotechnology. ACS NANO 2:395–402. doi:10.1021/nn800131j10.1021/nn800131j ↗
5. Lubick N (2008) Risks of nanotechnology remain uncertain. In: Environmental Science & Technology Online News. Available at http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2008/feb/science/nl_nanorisks.html. Accessed 20 Feb 200810.1021/es087058e ↗
6. Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdörster G, Philbert MA, Ryan J, Seaton A, Stone V, Tinkle SS, Tran L, Walker NJ, Warheit DB (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444:267–269. doi:10.1038/444267a10.1038/444267a ↗
7. Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–627. doi:10.1126/science.111439710.1126/science.1114397 ↗
8. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–83910.1289/ehp.7339 ↗
9. Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2004) Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs. Risk Anal 24(6):1475–1486. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00543.x10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00543.x ↗