Public perception of nanotechnology
Source abstract
Abstract
While several studies on the public opinion of nanotechnology have pointed to a rather enthusiastic U.S. public, the public uptake of nanotechnology in Europe is more contained. The results of the Swiss publifocus on nanotechnology reveal a pragmatic attitude of citizens toward the emerging technologies, thus confirming what has been identified as a “balanced approach” in the NanoJury UK.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanotechnology research and applications · Climate Change Communication and Perception
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Bainbridge WS (2002) Public attitudes toward nanotechnology. J Nanoparticle Res 4(6):561–57010.1023/A:1022805516652 ↗
2. Bodmer WF (1985) Public understanding of science. Report of a Royal Society ad hoc group. The Royal Society, London
3. Cobb M, Macoubrie J (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and trust. J Nanoparticle Res 6(4):395–40510.1007/s11051-004-3394-4 ↗
4. Cook AJ, Fairweather JR (2005) Nanotechnology—ethical and social issues: results from New Zealand focus groups. Research Report no. 281. Canterbury, New Zealand: Lincoln University. URL (consulted 24 June 2006): http://www.lincoln.ac.nz/story_images/1330_rr281_s4140.pdf
5. ETC Group (2003) The big down: atomtech—technologies converging at the nanoscale. ETC Group, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
6. Gaskell G, Ten Eyck T, Jackson J, Veltri G (2005) Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States. Public Underst Sci 14:81–9010.1177/0963662505048949 ↗
7. Kearnes M, Macnaghten P, Wilsdon J (2006) Governing at the nanoscale: people, policies and emerging technologies. Demos, London
8. Macnaghten P, Kearnes MB, Wynne B (2005) Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences? Sci Commun 27(2):268–29110.1177/1075547005281531 ↗
9. Macoubrie J (2005) Informed public perceptions of nanotechnology and trust in government. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. URL (consulted 26 November 2006): http://www.wilsoncenter.org/index.cfm?topic_id=166192&fuseaction=topics.event_summary&event_id=143410
10. Macoubrie J (2006) Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Underst Sci 15(2):221–24110.1177/0963662506056993 ↗
11. Madison (2005) Report of the Madison area citizen consensus conference on nanotechnology. 24 April. URL (consulted 5 April 2006): http://www.lafollette.wisc.edu/research/Nano/nanoreport42805.pdf
12. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113(7):823–83910.1289/ehp.7339 ↗
13. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2005) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: maximizing human benefit. J Nanoparticle Res 7:1–1310.1007/s11051-004-2336-5 ↗
14. Rogers-Hayden T, Pidgeon N (2006) Reflecting upon the UK’s citizens’ jury on nanotechnologies: nanojury UK. Nanotechnol Law Business May/June:167–178
15. Royal Society (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. RS policy document. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, London
16. Stilgoe J, Wilson R (2005) Public engagement with science. Demos, London
17. Swiss RE (2004) Nanotechnology: small matter—many unknowns. Swiss Reinsurance Company, Zurich
18. TA-Swiss (2006a) Publifocus Nanotechnologien—Bedeutung für Gesundheit und Umwelt. Projektbeschrieb für die Durchführung eines Dialog-Verfahrens mit Bürgerinnen und Bürgern. Zentrum für Technologiefolgen-Abschätzung beim Schweizerischen Wissenschafts- und Technologierat, Bern
19. TA-Swiss (2006b) Know your nano! information brochure for publifocus nanotechnology, health and the environment. Center for Technology Assessment at the Swiss Science and Technology Council, Bern
20. TA-Swiss (2006c) Public reactions to nanotechnology in Switzerland: the findings of the publifocus discussion forum nanotechnology, health and the environment, by Lucienne Rey. Center for Technology Assessment at the Swiss Science and Technology Council, Bern
21. Waldron AM, Spencer D, Batt CA (2006) The current state of public understanding of nanotechnology. J Nanoparticle Res 8:569–57510.1007/s11051-006-9112-7 ↗
22. Wilsdon J, Willis R (2004) See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London
23. Wilsdon J, Wynne B, Stilgoe J (2005) The public value of science: or how to ensure that science really matters. Demos, London
24. Wynne B (1991) Knowledges in context. Sci Technol Human Values 16(1):111–12110.1177/016224399101600108 ↗
25. Wynne B (2001) Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Sci Cult 10(4):445–48110.1080/09505430120093586 ↗
26. Ziman J (1991) Public understanding of science. Sci Technol Human Values 16(1):99–10510.1177/016224399101600106 ↗