Trends in worldwide nanotechnology patent applications: 1991 to 2008
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanotechnology patent applications published during 1991-2008 have been examined using the "title-abstract" keyword search on esp@cenet "worldwide" database. The longitudinal evolution of the number of patent applications, their topics, and their respective patent families have been evaluated for 15 national patent offices covering 98% of the total global activity. The patent offices of the United States (USA), People's Republic of China (PRC), Japan, and South Korea have published the largest number of nanotechnology patent applications, and experienced significant but different growth rates after 2000. In most repositories, the largest numbers of nanotechnology patent applications originated from their own countries/regions, indicating a significant "home advantage." The top applicant institutions are from different sectors in different countries (e.g., from industry in the US and Canada patent offices, and from academe or government agencies at the PRC office). As compared to 2000, the year before the establishment of the US National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), numerous new invention topics appeared in 2008, in all 15 patent repositories. This is more pronounced in the USA and PRC. Patent families have increased among the 15 patent offices, particularly after 2005. Overlapping patent applications increased from none in 1991 to about 4% in 2000 and to about 27% in 2008. The largest share of equivalent nanotechnology patent applications (1,258) between two repositories was identified between the US and Japan patent offices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Nanotechnology research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Albert R, Barabasi AL (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74:47–9710.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 ↗
2. Andersen PH, Drejer I, Waldstrøm C (2006) In the eye of the storm—knowledge appropriation and the globalization of regional competencies. In: The proceedings of the annual meeting of the Academy of Management
3. Chemical Abstracts Service (April 24, 2008) Patent terminology. Available http://www.stn-international.de/training_center/patents/pat_term.pdf
4. Chen H, Schuffels C, Orwig R (1996) Internet categorization and search: a machine learning approach. J Vis Commun Image Represent 7(1):88–10210.1006/jvci.1996.0008 ↗
5. Criscuolo P (2005) The ‘home advantage’ effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USPTO and the EPO. Scientometrics 66(1):23–4110.1007/s11192-006-0003-6 ↗
6. EPO (2008) Global patent data coverage. Available http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/2464E1CD907399E0C12572D50031B5DD/$File/global_patent_data_coverage.pdf
7. Espacenet Website. Also published as documents. Retrieved April 24, 2009, from http://ep.espacenet.com/help?topic=publishedas&&method=handleHelpTopic&locale=en_ep
8. Espacenet Website. Corresponding documents. Retrieved April 24, 2009, from http://ep.espacenet.com/help?topic=corresponding&method=handleHelpTopic&locale=en_ep
9. Espacenet Website. Coverage of the worldwide database. Retrieved April 24, 2009, from http://ep.espacenet.com/help?topic=coverageww
10. Espacenet Website. esp@cenet databases. Retrieved April 24, 2009, from http://ep.espacenet.com/help?topic=coveragesqh&locale=en_EP&method=handleHelpTopic
11. Espacenet Website. Patent families. Retrieved April 24, 2009, from http://ep.espacenet.com/help?locale=en_EP&method=handleHelpTopic&topic=patentfamily
12. Espacenet Website. What is a cited document? Retrieved April 24, 2009, from http://v3.espacenet.com/answer?AID=3&AACT=textdoc
13. European Commission (1997) Second European report on S&T indicators. European Commission, Brussels
14. Ganguli P (1998) Intellectual property rights in transition. World Pat Inf 20(3–4):171–18010.1016/S0172-2190(99)00005-8 ↗
15. Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122:108–11110.1126/science.122.3159.108 ↗
16. Hingley P, Park W (2003) Patent family data and statistics at the European Patent Office. WIPO-OED workshop on statistics in the patent field, Geneva
17. Hu D, Chen H, Huang Z, Roco MC (2007) Longitudinal study on patent citations to academic research articles in nanotechnology (1976–2004). J Nanopart Res 9(4):529–54210.1007/s11051-007-9215-9 ↗
18. Huang Z, Chen H, Yip A, Ng G, Guo F, Chen Z-K, Roco MC (2003) Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: country, institution and technology field. J Nanopart Res 5:333–36310.1023/A:1025556800994 ↗
19. Huang Z, Chen H, Li X, Roco MC (2006) Connecting NSF funding to patent innovation in nanotechnology (2001–2004). J Nanopart Res 8(6):859–87910.1007/s11051-006-9147-9 ↗
20. Li X, Lin Y, Chen H, Roco MC (2007) Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004). J Nanopart Res 9(6):977–100210.1007/s11051-007-9273-z ↗
21. Narin F (1998) Patents and publicly funded research: assessing the value of research in the chemical sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 59–72
22. Oldham P, Cutter AM (2006) Mapping global status and trends in patent activity for biological and genetic material. Genomics Soc Policy 2(2):62–9110.1186/1746-5354-2-2-62 ↗
23. Ong T-H, Chen H, Sun W-K, Zhu B (2005) News map: a knowledge map for online news. Decis Support Syst 39(4):583–59710.1016/j.dss.2004.03.008 ↗
24. Oppenheim C (2000) Do patent citations count? The Web of Knowledge (Information Today Inc.), Medford
25. Roco MC (2005) International perspective on government nanotechnology funding in 2005. J Nanopart Res 7(6):707–71210.1007/s11051-005-3141-5 ↗
26. Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P (2000) Nanotechnology research directions. Springer, Dordrecht10.1007/978-94-015-9576-6 ↗
27. Seymour EH, Borges FC, Fernandes R (2007) Indicators of European public research in hydrogen and fuel cells—an input–output analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32:3212–322210.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.02.031 ↗
28. Tolle K, Chen H (2000) Comparing noun phrasing techniques for use with medical digital library tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci 51(4):352–37010.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:4<352::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗