Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976–2004)
Source abstract
Abstract
The patent citation networks are described using critical node, core network, and network topological analysis. The main objective is understanding of the knowledge transfer processes between technical fields, institutions and countries. This includes identifying key influential players and subfields, the knowledge transfer patterns among them, and the overall knowledge transfer efficiency. The proposed framework is applied to the field of nanoscale science and engineering (NSE), including the citation networks of patent documents, submitting institutions, technology fields, and countries. The NSE patents were identified by keywords “full-text” searching of patents at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The analysis shows that the United States is the most important citation center in NSE research. The institution citation network illustrates a more efficient knowledge transfer between institutions than a random network. The country citation network displays a knowledge transfer capability as efficient as a random network. The technology field citation network and the patent document citation network exhibit a␣less efficient knowledge diffusion capability than a random network. All four citation networks show a tendency to form local citation clusters.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Albert R., Barabasi A.L. (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74:47–9710.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 ↗
2. Barabasi A.L., Albert R. (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509–51210.1126/science.286.5439.509 ↗
3. Bilke S., Peterson C. (2001) Topological properties of citation and metabolic networks. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 64:03610610.1103/PhysRevE.64.036106 ↗
4. Chakrabarti A.K., Dror I., Eakabuse N. (1993) Inter-organizational Transfer of Knowledge - an Analysis of Patent Citations of a Defense Firm. IEEE T. Eng. Manage. 40:91–9410.1109/17.206656 ↗
5. Chen C.M., Hicks D. (2004) Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics 59:199–21110.1023/B:SCIE.0000018528.59913.48 ↗
6. Cowan R., Jonard N. (2004) Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 28:1557–157510.1016/j.jedc.2003.04.002 ↗
7. Erdos P., Renyi A. (1959) On random graphs. Publ. Math.-Debrecen 6:290–29710.5486/PMD.1959.6.3-4.12 ↗
8. Gansner E.R., North S.C. (2000) An open graph visualization system and its applications to software engineering. Software Pract. Exper. 30:1203–123310.1002/1097-024X(200009)30:11<1203::AID-SPE338>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
9. Huang Z., Chen H., Yip A., Ng G., Guo F., Chen Z.-K., Roco M.C. (2003a) Longitudinal patent analysis for Nanoscale Science and Engineering: Country, institution and technology field. J Nanoparticle Res 5:333–36310.1023/A:1025556800994 ↗
10. Huang M.H., Chiang L.Y., Chen D.Z. (2003b) Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan’s high-tech companies. Scientometrics 58:489–50610.1023/B:SCIE.0000006876.29052.bf ↗
11. Huang Z., Chen H., Chen Z.-K., Roco M.C. (2004) International Nanotechnology Development in 2003: Country, Institution, and Technology Field Analysis Based on USPTO Patent Database. J Nanoparticle Res 6:325–35410.1007/s11051-004-4117-6 ↗
12. Karki M.M. (1997) Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool. World Patent Inf 19:269–27210.1016/S0172-2190(97)00033-1 ↗
13. Lewison G. (1998) Gastroenterology research in the United Kingdom: funding sources and impact. Gut 43:288–29310.1136/gut.43.2.288 ↗
14. Meyer M. (2000) Patent citations in a novel field of technology - What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics 48:151–17810.1023/A:1005692621105 ↗
15. Meyer M.S. (2001) Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics 51:163–18310.1023/A:1010572914033 ↗
16. Morone P., Taylor R. (2004) Knowledge diffusion dynamics and network properties of face-to-face interactions. J. Evol. Econ. 14:327–35110.1007/s00191-004-0211-2 ↗
17. Narin F. (1994) Patent Bibliometrics. Scientometrics 30:147–15510.1007/BF02017219 ↗
18. Oppenheim C. (2000) Do Patent Citations Count?, In: Cromin B., Atkins H.B. (Eds) The Web of knowledge. Information Today, Inc., Medford, pp. 405–432
19. Redner S. (1998) How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. Eur. Phys. J. B 4:131–13410.1007/s100510050359 ↗
20. Singh J., 2003. Social Networks as Drivers of Knowledge Diffusion. In Available at SSRN DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.43187210.2139/ssrn.431872 ↗
21. Verbeek A., Debackere K., Luwel M. (2003) Science cited in patents: A geographic “flow” analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents. Scientometrics 58:241–26310.1023/A:1026232526034 ↗
22. Watts D.J., Strogatz S.H. (1998) Collective dynamics of ‚small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–44210.1038/30918 ↗