Advanced membrane technologies for water treatment: utilization of nanomaterials and nanoparticles in membranes fabrication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Nagarajan KJ, Balaji AN, Kasi Rajan ST, Ramanujan NR (2017) Carbohydrate polymers. Chem Soc Rev 174:200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11810710.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118107 ↗
2. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties, and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00108B10.1039/C0CS00108B ↗
3. Kolakovic R, Peltonen L, Laaksonen T, Putkisto K, Laukkanen A, Hirvonen J (2005) Spray-dried cellulose nanofibers as a novel tablet excipient. AAPS PharmSciTech 26:3055–3064. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-011-9705-z10.1208/s12249-011-9705-z ↗
4. Hoyos CG, Zuluaga R, Gañán P, Pique TM, Vazquez A, Cleaner J (2019) Food Hydrocolloids 87:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.07.03510.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.07.035 ↗
5. Xue L, Ding J, Liu Y, Ma Y, Yang C, Wang W, Wang Y (2024) Strategies and methods of nanocrystal technology for targeting drug delivery. J Nanopart Res 26(6):114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-024-06025-z10.1007/s11051-024-06025-z ↗
6. Langguth KJ, Maccagnano-Zachera S, Heinemann J (2024) Microfluidic production of silver nanoparticles demonstrates ability for on demand synthesis of a wide size distribution of particles. J Nanopart Res 26(3):40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-024-05944-110.1007/s11051-024-05944-1 ↗
7. Das, T. K., Jesionek, M., Çelik, Y., & Poater, A. (2023). Catalytic polymer nanocomposites for environmental remediation in wastewater. Science of The Total Environment, 165772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16577210.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165772 ↗
8. Das, T. K., Basak, S., & Ganguly, S. (2024). 2D nanomaterial for microplastic removal: a critical review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 152451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.15245110.1016/j.cej.2024.152451 ↗
9. Das TK, Remanan S, Ghosh S, Das NC (2021) An environment friendly free-standing cellulose membrane derived for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol: a sustainable approach. J Environ Chem Eng 9(1):104596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.10459610.1016/j.jece.2020.104596 ↗
10. Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT, Cardona F (2012) Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: an overview. Compos B Eng 43(7):2883–2892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.05310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.053 ↗
11. Seydibeyoglu, M. Ö., Mohanty, A. K., & Misra, F. (Eds.). (2011). Woodhead Publishing Series in composites science and engineering. Woodhead Publishing, 35, 4230–4237.
12. Akil HM, Omar MF, Mazuki AAM, Safiee S, Ishak ZAM, Abu Bakar A (2011) Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: a review. Mater Des 32:4107–4121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.00810.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.008 ↗
13. Lenz RW (1999) Macromolecular engineering of polylactones and polylactides. XXV. Synthesis and characterization of bioerodible amphiphilic networks and their use as controlled drug delivery systems. J Polym Sci, Part A: Polym Chem 37:2401–2411. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19990715)37:14%3c2401::AID-POLA14%3e3.0.CO;2-910.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19990715)37:14<2401::AID-POLA14>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
14. Holbery J, Houston D (2006) JOM world nonferrous smelter survey, part III: nickel: laterite. JOM 58:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0209-310.1007/s11837-006-0209-3 ↗
15. Huang J, Rodrigue D (2014) Material flow and thermo-mechanical conditions during friction stir welding of polymers: literature review, experimental results, and empirical analysis. Mater Des 59:344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.03810.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.038 ↗
16. de Mesquita JP, Donnici CL, Pereira FV (2010) Biobased nanocomposites from layer-by-layer assembly of cellulose nanowhiskers with chitosan. Biomacromol 11(2):473–480. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm901198510.1021/bm9011985 ↗
17. Nagarajan KJ, Balaji AN, Ramanujam NR (2019) Extraction of cellulose nanofibers from Cocos nucifera var Aurantiaca peduncle by ball milling combined with chemical treatment. CarbohydraThe graftlymers 212:312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.06310.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.063 ↗
18. Salas C, Nypelö T, Rodriguez-Abreu C, Carrillo C, Rojas OJ (2014) Nanocellulose properties and applications in colloids and interfaces. Colloids Surf, A 19:383–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2014.10.00310.1016/j.cocis.2014.10.003 ↗
19. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Soc Rev 110:3479–3500. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900339w10.1021/cr900339w ↗
20. Habibi Y (2014) Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev 43:1519–1542. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60204D10.1039/C3CS60204D ↗
21. Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. 2. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochemical Journal 58:345. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj058034510.1042/bj0580345 ↗
22. Tashiro K, Kobayashi M (1991) Theoretical evaluation of three-dimensional elastic constants of native and regenerated celluloses: role of hydrogen bonds. Polymer 32:1516–1526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(91)90435-L10.1016/0032-3861(91)90435-L ↗
23. Šturcová A, Davies GR, Eichhorn SJ (2005) Elastic modulus and stress-transfer properties of tunicate cellulose whiskers. Biomacromol 6:1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049291k10.1021/bm049291k ↗
24. Mohmood I, Lopes CB, Lopes I, Ahmad I, Duarte AC, Pereira E (2013) Nanoscale materials and their use in water contaminants removal-a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:1239–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1415-x10.1007/s11356-012-1415-x ↗
25. Mansouri J, Harrisson S, Chen V (2010) Strategies for controlling biofouling in membrane filtration systems: challenges and opportunities. J Mater Chem 20:4567–4586. https://doi.org/10.1039/B926440J10.1039/B926440J ↗
26. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Ikkala O, Berglund LA (2011) Strong and tough cellulose nanopaper with high specific surface area and porosity. Biomacromol 12:3638–3644. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm200890710.1021/bm2008907 ↗
27. Cárdenas Bates II, Loranger É, Mathew AP, Chabot B (2021) Cellulose reinforced electrospun chitosan nanofibers bio-based composite sorbent for water treatment applications. Cellulose 28:4865–4885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03828-410.1007/s10570-021-03828-4 ↗
28. Banavath HN, Bhardwaj NK, Ray AK (2011) A comparative study of the effect of refining on charge of various pulps. Biores Technol 102:4544–4551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.10910.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.109 ↗
29. Božic M, Liu P, Mathew AP, Kokol V (2014) Enzymatic phosphorylation of cellulose nanofibers to new highly-ions adsorbing, flame-retardant, and hydroxyapatite-growth induced natural nanoparticles. Cellulose Nanomaterials 21:2713–2726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0281-810.1007/s10570-014-0281-8 ↗
30. Yuan M, Liu D, Song Z, Liu W, Shang S, Cao H, Du J, Ren J, Cui S (2024) Tannic acid-assisted construction of amino-functionalized cellulose nanofiber composite aerogel for high-performance adsorption of Cr (VI), Cu (II) and Congo red: experimental and DFT studies. Sep Purif Technol 350:127979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.12797910.1016/j.seppur.2024.127979 ↗
31. Dufresne A (2013) Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today 16:220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.00410.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004 ↗
32. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20100127310.1002/anie.201001273 ↗
33. Mishra RK, Sabu A, Tiwari SK (2018) Materials chemistry and the futurist eco-friendly applications of nanocellulose: status and prospect. J Saudi Chem Soc 22:949–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2018.02.00510.1016/j.jscs.2018.02.005 ↗
34. Grenda K, Arnold J, Gamelas JAF, Rasteiro MG (2017) Environmentally friendly cellulose-based polyelectrolytes in wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 76:1490–1499. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.29910.2166/wst.2017.299 ↗
35. Gupta L, Mittal A, Katrolia A, Raizaday A, Kaushik L, Shukla BK (2024) Cubosomes the pliant honeycombed nano-cargos in drug delivery applications. Nanomedicine Journal 10:119–136. https://doi.org/10.22038/nmj.2024.75969.184810.22038/nmj.2024.75969.1848 ↗
36. Rol F, Belgacem MN, Gandini A, Bras J (2019) Recent advances in surface-modified cellulose nanofibrils. Prog Polym Sci 88:241–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.002 ↗
37. Kurniawan TW, Sulistyarti H, Rumhayati B, Sabarudin A (2023) Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) as adsorbents of heavy metal ions. J Chem 2023(1):5037027. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/503702710.1155/2023/5037027 ↗
38. Karim Z, Kim J, Lee KY, Kim D (2017) In situ TEMPO surface functionalization of nanocellulose membranes for enhanced adsorption of metal ions from aqueous medium. RSC Adv 7:5232–5241. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA25707K10.1039/C6RA25707K ↗
39. Goetz LA, Dong H, Swink SM, Yildirim I, Zhang X (2018) All cellulose electrospun water purification membranes are nanotextured using cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose 25:3011–3023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1751-110.1007/s10570-018-1751-1 ↗
40. Liyanage S, Senadeera G, Wijesinghe W, Subasinghe S (2021) Production and surface modification of cellulose bioproducts. Polymers 13:3433. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1319343310.3390/polym13193433 ↗
41. Seraji AA, Goharpey F, Khademzadeh Yeganeh J (2022) Highly crystallized and tough polylactic acid through addition of surface modified cellulose nanocrystals. J Appl Polym Sci 139(37):e52871. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5287110.1002/app.52871 ↗
42. Bährle-Rapp, M. (2012). Springer Lexikon Kosmetik und Körperpflege (pp. 87–7). Springer. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59127-710.1007/978-3-662-59127-7 ↗
43. Singh KK (2022) Role of nanotechnology and nanomaterials for water treatment and environmental remediation. International Journal of New Chemistry 9:373–398. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijnc.2022.3.610.22034/ijnc.2022.3.6 ↗
44. Rachmaniar S, Nugraha DA, Santjojo DJ, Tjahjanto RT, Mufti N, Masruroh. (2024) Prevention of particle agglomeration in sol–gel synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles via addition of surfactant. J Nanopart Res 26(3):45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-024-05943-210.1007/s11051-024-05943-2 ↗
45. Zhang W, Zhang S, Wang X, Liu Z, Cheng X, Chen J (2019) Application of natural mixed bacteria immobilized carriers to different kinds of organic wastewater treatment and microbial community comparison. J Hazard Mater 377:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.06810.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.068 ↗
46. Aoudi B, Boluk Y, El-Din MG (2022) Recent advances and future perspective on nanocellulose-based materials in diverse water treatment applications. Sci Total Environ 843:156903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15690310.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156903 ↗
47. Ehmann HM, Mohan T, Koshanskaya M, Scheicher S, Breitwieser D, Ribitsch V, Stana-Kleinschek K, Spirk S (2014) Design of anticoagulant surfaces based on cellulose nanocrystals. Chem Commun 50:13070–13072. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CC05254D10.1039/C4CC05254D ↗
48. Putro JN, Soetaredjo FE, Kurniawan A, Ismadji S, Ayucitra A (2017) Nanocellulose based biosorbents for wastewater treatment: study of isotherm, kinetic, thermodynamic and reusability. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management 8:134–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2017.07.00210.1016/j.enmm.2017.07.002 ↗
49. Benabe JE, Wang WH, Lin SH (1987) Mechanism of inhibition of glycolysis by vanadate. J Biol Chem 262:9555–9560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)47969-010.1016/S0021-9258(18)47969-0 ↗
50. Seyhan AT, Bayram G, Cilingir U, Akay R (2009) Cure kinetics of vapor grown carbon nanofiber (VGCNF) modified epoxy resin suspensions and fracture toughness of their resulting nanocomposites. Mater Chem Phys 118:234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.07.04510.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.07.045 ↗
51. Vallée A, Humblot V, Al Housseiny R, Boujday S, Pradier CM (2013) BSA adsorption on aliphatic and aromatic acid SAMs: investigating the effect of residual surface charge and sublayer nature. Colloids Surf, B 109:136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.03.01410.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.03.014 ↗
52. Dhar P, Nando GB, Chattopadhyay D (2016) Acid functionalized cellulose nanocrystals and its effect on mechanical, thermal, crystallization and surfaces properties of poly (lactic acid) bionanocomposites films: a comprehensive study. Polymer 101:75–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.08.02810.1016/j.polymer.2016.08.028 ↗
53. Show K, Mao T, Lee D (2007) Optimization of sludge disruption by sonication. Water Res 41:4741–4747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.01710.1016/j.watres.2007.07.017 ↗
54. Katō K, Komorita H (1968) Pyrolysis of cellulose: part V. Isolation and identification of 3-deoxyglycosones produced from D-glucose, D-xylose, and α-cellulose by heating. Agric Biol Chem 32:715–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/00021369.1968.1085913010.1080/00021369.1968.10859130 ↗
55. Zarei A, Ghaffarian V (2013) Preparation and characterization of biodegradable cellulose acetate-starch membrane. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 52:387–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2012.75283110.1080/03602559.2012.752831 ↗
56. Muiruri JK, Huan S, Liu F, Zhang X, Ragauskas AJ (2017) Highly biodegradable and tough polylactic acid–cellulose nanocrystal composite. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 5:3929–3937. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0312310.1021/acssuschemeng.6b03123 ↗
57. Nagarajan KJ, Ramanujam NR, Sanjay MR, Siengchin S, Surya Rajan B, Sathick Basha K, Madhu P, Raghav GR (2021) A comprehensive review on cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibers: pretreatment, preparation, and characterization. Polym Compos 42:1588–1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2592910.1002/pc.25929 ↗
58. Maull KI, Osmand AP, Maull CD (1985) Liquid caustic ingestions: an in vitro study of the effects of buffer, neutralization, and dilution. Ann Emerg Med 14:1160–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(85)81021-010.1016/S0196-0644(85)81021-0 ↗
59. Gran G (1952) Determination of the equivalence point in potentiometric titrations. Part II Analyst 77:661–671. https://doi.org/10.1039/AN952770066110.1039/AN9527700661 ↗
60. Nelo M, Huttunen-Saarivirta E, Kujanpää V, Kinnunen P, Kymäläinen M (2019) Solid air—low-temperature manufacturing of ultra-low permittivity composite materials for future telecommunication systems. Frontiers in Materials 6:94. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.0009410.3389/fmats.2019.00094 ↗
61. Zhou X, Zhang Y, Gong C, Liu B, Wei G (2020) Production, structural design, functional control, and broad applications of carbon nanofiber-based nanomaterials: a comprehensive review. Chem Eng J 402:126189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12618910.1016/j.cej.2020.126189 ↗
62. Suganuma S, Nakamura M, Nishimoto S, Hongo M, Mori S (2008) Hydrolysis of cellulose by amorphous carbon bearing SO3H, COOH, and OH groups. J Am Chem Soc 130:12787–12793. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja803983h10.1021/ja803983h ↗
63. Mahiout A, Lagneaux D, Ronco PM (1987) Dialyzer membranes: effect of surface area and chemical modification of cellulose on complement and platelet activation. Artif Organs 11:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.1987.tb02648.x10.1111/j.1525-1594.1987.tb02648.x ↗
64. Bethke K, Lei Y, Hensley D, Matson J (2018) Functionalized cellulose for water purification, antimicrobial applications, and sensors. Adv Func Mater 28:1800409. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20180040910.1002/adfm.201800409 ↗
65. Yi T, Zhao H, Mo Q, Pan D, Liu Y, Huang L, Xu H, Hu B, Song H (2020) From cellulose to cellulose nanofibrils—a comprehensive review of the preparation and modification of cellulose nanofibrils. Materials 13(22):5062. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1322506210.3390/ma13225062 ↗
66. Xie H, Du H, Zhao S, Wang Y, Yao J (2018) Recent strategies in preparation of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils derived from raw cellulose materials. International Journal of Polymer Science 2018:3649201. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/792306810.1155/2018/7923068 ↗
67. Nickerson RF, Habrle JA (1947) Cellulose intercrystalline structure American Chemical Society 39:1507. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50455a02410.1021/ie50455a024 ↗
68. Mao, J., Abushammala, H., Brown, N., & Laborie, M. P. (2017). Comparative assessment of methods for producing cellulose I nanocrystals from cellulosic sources. Nanocelluloses: their preparation, properties, and applications, 19–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2017-1251.ch00210.1021/bk-2017-1251.ch002 ↗
69. Nagarajan KJ, Balaji AN, Rajan STK, Basha KS (2019) Effect of sulfuric acid reaction time on the properties and behavior of cellulose nanocrystals from Cocos nucifera var-Aurantiaca peduncle’s cellulose microfibers. Materials Research Express 6:125333. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab5a9d10.1088/2053-1591/ab5a9d ↗
70. Ivarie R (2003) Avian transgenesis: progress towards the promise. Trends Biotechnol 21:14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(02)00009-410.1016/S0167-7799(02)00009-4 ↗
71. Cheng M, Li Y, Li H, Li X, Sun R (2017) Facile one-step extraction and oxidative carboxylation of cellulose nanocrystals through hydrothermal reaction by using mixed inorganic acids. Cellulose 24:3243–3254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1339-110.1007/s10570-017-1339-1 ↗
72. Wang H, Xie H, Du H, Wang X, Liu W, Duan Y, Zhang X, Sun L, Zhang X, Si C (2020) Highly efficient preparation of functional and thermostable cellulose nanocrystals via H2SO4 intensified acetic acid hydrolysis. Carbohyd Polym 239:116233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11623310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116233 ↗
73. Sadeghifar H, Venditti RA, Jur JS, Pawlak JJ (2011) Production of cellulose nanocrystals using hydrobromic acid and click reactions on their surface. J Mater Sci 46:7344–7355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5696-010.1007/s10853-011-5696-0 ↗
74. Gowtham P, Girigoswami K, Prabhu AD, Pallavi P, Thirumalai A, Harini K, Girigoswami A (2024) Hydrogels of alginate derivative-encased nanodots featuring carbon-coated manganese ferrite cores with gold shells to offer antiangiogenesis with multimodal imaging-based theranostics. Advanced Therapeutics 7(6):2400054. https://doi.org/10.1002/adtp.20240005410.1002/adtp.202400054 ↗
75. Pinkerton NM, Gindy ME, Calero-DdelC VL, Wolfson T, Pagels RF, Adler D, Gao D, Li S, Wang R, Prud’homme RK (2015) Single-step assembly of multimodal imaging nanocarriers: MRI and long-wavelength fluorescence imaging. Adv Healthcare Mater 4(9):1376–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20140076610.1002/adhm.201400766 ↗
76. Cherednichenko Y, Batasheva S, Akhatova F, Fakhrullin R, Rozhina E (2024) Antibiofilm activity of silver nanoparticles-halloysite nanocomposite in Serratia marcescens. J Nanopart Res 26(4):71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-024-05971-y10.1007/s11051-024-05971-y ↗
77. Uczay F, de Campos CEM, de Andrade Maranhão T, Jost CL, Mezalira DZ (2024) Optimizing hydrothermal synthesis of titanium dioxide nanotubes: Doehlert method and desirability function approach. J Nanopart Res 26(5):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-024-06014-210.1007/s11051-024-06014-2 ↗
78. Tan X, Liu Y, Zeng G, Wang X, Hu X, Gu Y, Yang Z (2015) Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 125:70–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.05810.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.058 ↗
79. Mohan D, Sarswat A, Ok YS, Pittman CU Jr (2014) Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent–a critical review. Biores Technol 160:191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.12010.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.120 ↗
80. Inyang MI, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman A, Mosa A, Pullammanappallil P, Ok YS, Cao X (2016) A review of biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aqueous heavy metal removal. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46(4):406–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2015.109688010.1080/10643389.2015.1096880 ↗
81. Luo, H. (2018). Catalytic depolymerization of native and technical lignin into phenolic compounds using nickel catalyst. (Doctoral dissertation, UC Santa Barbara). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/04s8p6q7
82. Jonoobi M, Oladi R, Davoudpour Y, Oksman K, Dufresne A, Hamzeh Y, Davoodi R (2015) Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review. Cellulose 22:935–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0551-010.1007/s10570-015-0551-0 ↗
83. Donsi F, Wang Y, Li JI, Huang Q (2010) Preparation of curcumin sub-micrometer dispersions by high-pressure homogenization. J Agric Food Chem 58(5):2848–2853. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf903968x10.1021/jf903968x ↗
84. Mercuri AM (2016) Quality by design applied to ocular solid lipid nanoparticles containing a hydrophilic peptide prepared via a hot high-pressure homogenizer. Curr Drug Deliv 13(8):1247–126010.2174/1567201813666160325131831 ↗
85. Saelee K, Yingkamhaeng N, Nimchua T, Sukyai P (2016) An environmentally friendly xylanase-assisted pretreatment for cellulose nanofibrils isolation from sugarcane bagasse by high-pressure homogenization. Ind Crops Prod 82:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.06410.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.064 ↗
86. Ashori A, Sepahvand S, Jonoobi M (2024) Development of biodegradable nanofiber filters based on surface-modified cellulose nanofibers with graphene oxide for high removal of airborne particulate matter. Int J Biol Macromol 261:129687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.12968710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129687 ↗
87. Bergmeir C, Benítez JM (2012) On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation. Inf Sci 191:192–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.02810.1016/j.ins.2011.12.028 ↗
88. Webster DR, Humphrey JAC (1993) Experimental observations of flow instability in a helical coil (Data bank contribution). J Fluids Eng 115(3):436–443. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.291015710.1115/1.2910157 ↗
89. Sofla MRK, Rouhi M, Tsuzuki T, Hossain MSA (2016) A comparison of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibers extracted from bagasse using acid and ball milling methods. Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 7:035004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6262/7/3/03500410.1088/2043-6262/7/3/035004 ↗
90. Fecht HJ, Hellstern E, Fu Z, Johnson WL (1990) Nanocrystalline metals prepared by high-energy ball milling. Metall Trans A 21:2333–2337. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264698010.1007/BF02646980 ↗
91. Kardam A, Raj KR, Srivastava S, Srivastava MM (2014) Nanocellulose fibers for biosorption of cadmium, nickel, and lead ions from aqueous solution. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:385–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0634-210.1007/s10098-013-0634-2 ↗
92. Zoppe JO, Habibi Y, Rojas OJ, Venditti RA, Johansson L, Efimenko K, Osterberg M, Laine J (2010) Poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide) brushes grafted from cellulose nanocrystals via surface-initiated single-electron transfer living radical polymerization. Biomacromol 11:2683–2691. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100719d10.1021/bm100719d ↗
93. Biçak N, Sherrington DC, Senkal BF (1999) Graft copolymer of acrylamide onto cellulose as mercury selective sorbent. React Funct Polym 41:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-5148(99)00021-810.1016/S1381-5148(99)00021-8 ↗
94. Zhang N, Zang G-L, Shi C, Yu H-Q, Sheng G-P (2016) A novel adsorbent TEMPO-mediated oxidized cellulose nanofibrils modified with PEI: preparation, characterization, and application for Cu(II) removal. J Hazard Mater 316:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.01810.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.018 ↗
95. Navarro RR, Sumi K, Matsumura M (1999) Improved metal affinity of chelating adsorbents through graft polymerization. Water Res 33:2037–2044. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00421-710.1016/S0043-1354(98)00421-7 ↗
96. Chen B, Zheng Q, Zhu J, Li J, Cai Z, Chen L, Gong S (2016) Mechanically strong fully biobased anisotropic cellulose aerogels. RSC Adv 6:96518–96526. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA19280G10.1039/C6RA19280G ↗
97. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S (2001) Steric stabilization of a cellulose microcrystal suspension by poly(ethylene glycol) grafting. Langmuir 17:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1021/la001070m10.1021/la001070m ↗
98. Navarro RR, Sumi K, Fujii N, Matsumura M (1996) Mercury removal from wastewater using porous cellulose carrier modified with polyethyleneimine. Water Res 30(10):2488–2494. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(96)00143-110.1016/0043-1354(96)00143-1 ↗
99. Goffin AL, Habibi Y, Raquez JM, Dubois P (2012) Polyester-grafted cellulose nanowhiskers: a new approach for tuning the microstructure of immiscible polyester blends. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4(7):3364–3371. https://doi.org/10.1021/am300819610.1021/am3008196 ↗
100. Goffin AL, Raquez JM, Duquesne E, Siqueira G, Habibi Y, Dufresne A, Dubois P (2011) From interfacial ring-opening polymerization to melt processing of cellulose nanowhisker-filled polylactide-based nanocomposites. Biomacromol 12(7):2456–2465. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm200581h10.1021/bm200581h ↗