journal article·2024-02

Exploring the advancements in surface-modified bioactive glass: enhancing antibacterial activity, promoting angiogenesis, and modulating bioactivity

Mannie Belay Taye, Henni Setia Ningsih, Shao-Ju Shih

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 26· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Medical and Biological Ozone Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Chatterjee S, Gardner TJ (2002) Factors determining selection of valve prosthesis-tissue or mechanical: Current status. Pathophysiol Eval Manage Valvular Heart Dis 39:189–194. https://doi.org/10.1159/00015892710.1159/000158927 ↗
2. Rahimtoola SH (2003) Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 41(6):893–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02965-010.1016/S0735-1097(02)02965-0 ↗
3. Taye MB (2022) Biomedical applications of ion-doped bioactive glass: a review. Appl Nanosci 12(12):3797–3812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-022-02672-710.1007/s13204-022-02672-7 ↗
4. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE (2004) Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. Elsevier
5. Bhat S, Kumar A (2013) Biomaterials and bioengineering tomorrow’s healthcare. Biomatter 3(3):e24717. https://doi.org/10.4161/biom.2471710.4161/biom.24717 ↗
6. Workie AB, Shih S-J (2023) Mesoporous bioactive glasses: synthesis, characterization, and their medical applications. Surf Rev Lett 30(04):2330004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X2330004610.1142/S0218625X23300046 ↗
7. Hench LL, Thompson I (2010) "Twenty-first century challenges for biomaterials". J Royal Soc Interface 7(suppl_4):S379-S391. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2010.0151.focus10.1098/rsif.2010.0151.focus ↗
8. Hench LL, Polak JM (2002) Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 295(5557):1014–1017. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.106740410.1126/science.1067404 ↗
9. Zaokari Y, Persaud A, Ibrahim A (2020) Biomaterials for adhesion in orthopedic applications: a review. Eng Regene 1:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2020.07.00210.1016/j.engreg.2020.07.002 ↗
10. Navarro M, Michiardi A, Castano O, Planell J (2008) Biomaterials in orthopaedics. J R Soc Interface 5(27):1137–1158. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.015110.1098/rsif.2008.0151 ↗
11. Hench LL, Wilson J (1984) Surface-active biomaterials. Science 226(4675):630–636. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.609325310.1126/science.6093253 ↗
12. Cai S, Wu C, Yang W, Liang W, Yu H, Liu L (2020) "Recent advance in surface modification for regulating cell adhesion and behaviors". 9(1):971–989. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2020-007610.1515/ntrev-2020-0076 ↗
13. Amani H et al (2019) Controlling cell behavior through the design of biomaterial surfaces: a focus on surface modification techniques. Adv Mater Interfaces 6(13):1900572. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20190057210.1002/admi.201900572 ↗
14. Thanigaivel S, Priya A, Balakrishnan D, Dutta K, Rajendran S, Soto-Moscoso M (2022) Insight on recent development in metallic biomaterials: strategies involving synthesis, types and surface modification for advanced therapeutic and biomedical applications. Biochem Eng J 187:108522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2022.10852210.1016/j.bej.2022.108522 ↗
15. Qiao K et al (2022) The advances in nanomedicine for bone and cartilage repair. J Nanobiotechnol 20(1):141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01342-810.1186/s12951-022-01342-8 ↗
16. Cai S, Wu C, Yang W, Liang W, Yu H, Liu L (2020) Recent advance in surface modification for regulating cell adhesion and behaviors. Nanotechnol Rev 9(1):971–989. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2020-007610.1515/ntrev-2020-0076 ↗
17. Nobles KP, Janorkar AV, Williamson RS (2021) Surface modifications to enhance osseointegration–resulting material properties and biological responses. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 109(11):1909–1923. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3483510.1002/jbm.b.34835 ↗
18. Batool F et al (2021) Modulation of immune-inflammatory responses through surface modifications of biomaterials to promote bone healing and regeneration. J Tissue Eng 12:20417314211041428. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731421104142810.1177/20417314211041428 ↗
19. Özer A, Öksüz K (2019) The effect of yttrium oxide in hydroxyapatite/aluminum oxide hybrid biocomposite materials: phase, mechanical and morphological evaluation. Materialwiss Werkstofftech 50(11):1382–1390. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.20180014110.1002/mawe.201800141 ↗
20. Tabatabaei FS, Torres R, Tayebi L (2020) "Biomedical materials in dentistry". Appl Biomed Eng Dent pp 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21583-5_210.1007/978-3-030-21583-5_2 ↗
21. Ege D, Zheng K, Boccaccini AR (2022) Borate bioactive glasses (BBG): bone regeneration, wound healing applications, and future directions. ACS Appl Bio Mater 5(8):3608–3622. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.2c0038410.1021/acsabm.2c00384 ↗
22. Huang W, Day DE, Kittiratanapiboon K, Rahaman MN (2006) Kinetics and mechanisms of the conversion of silicate (45S5), borate, and borosilicate glasses to hydroxyapatite in dilute phosphate solutions. J Mater Sci - Mater Med 17:583–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-9220-z10.1007/s10856-006-9220-z ↗
23. Rahaman MN, Liang W, Day DE (2005) Preparation and bioactive characteristics of porous borate glass substrates. Adv Bioceram Biocomposites: Ceramic Eng Sci Proc 26:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470291269.ch110.1002/9780470291269.ch1 ↗
24. Pan H et al (2010) Strontium borate glass: potential biomaterial for bone regeneration. J R Soc Interface 7(48):1025–1031. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.050410.1098/rsif.2009.0504 ↗
25. Fernandes JS, Gentile P, Pires RA, Reis RL, Hatton PV (2017) Multifunctional bioactive glass and glass-ceramic biomaterials with antibacterial properties for repair and regeneration of bone tissue. Acta Biomater 59:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.04610.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.046 ↗
26. Yang X et al (2012) Incorporation of B2O3 in CaO-SiO2-P2O5 bioactive glass system for improving strength of low-temperature co-fired porous glass ceramics. J Non-Cryst Solids 358(9):1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.02.00510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.02.005 ↗
27. Fu Q, Rahaman MN, Fu H, Liu X (2010) Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 95(1):164–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3282410.1002/jbm.a.32824 ↗
28. Yao A, Wang D, Huang W, Fu Q, Rahaman MN, Day DE (2007) In vitro bioactive characteristics of borate-based glasses with controllable degradation behavior. J Am Ceram Soc 90(1):303–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01358.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01358.x ↗
29. Negut I, Ristoscu C (2023) Bioactive glasses for soft and hard tissue healing applications—a short review. Appl Sci 13(10):6151. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1310615110.3390/app13106151 ↗
30. Miguez-Pacheco V, Hench LL, Boccaccini AR (2015) Bioactive glasses beyond bone and teeth: emerging applications in contact with soft tissues. Acta Biomater 13:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.00410.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.004 ↗
31. Kaou MH, Furkó M, Balázsi K, Balázsi C (2023) Advanced bioactive glasses: the newest achievements and breakthroughs in the area. Nanomaterials 13(16):2287. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1316228710.3390/nano13162287 ↗
32. Jones JR (2013) Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 9(1):4457–4486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.02310.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
33. Zhao W, Chang J (2004) Sol–gel synthesis and in vitro bioactivity of tricalcium silicate powders. Mater Lett 58(19):2350–2353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.03.06610.1016/j.molstruc.2014.03.066 ↗
34. Öksüz K, Kılınç S, Özer A (2019) "Effect of calcination on microstructure development and properties of hydroxyapatite powders extracted from human and bovine bones". Trans Indian Ceramic Soc 78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0371750x.2019.158817010.1080/0371750x.2019.1588170 ↗
35. Jeong J, Kim JH, Shim JH, Hwang NS, Heo CY (2019) Bioactive calcium phosphate materials and applications in bone regeneration. Biomater Res 23(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0149-310.1186/s40824-018-0149-3 ↗
36. Tavoni M, Dapporto M, Tampieri A, Sprio S (2021) Bioactive calcium phosphate-based composites for bone regeneration. J Compos Sci 5(9):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs509022710.3390/jcs5090227 ↗
37. Farag MM (2023) Recent trends on biomaterials for tissue regeneration applications. J Mater Sci 58(2):527–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-08102-x10.1007/s10853-022-08102-x ↗
38. LeGeros RZ, Legeros JP (1984) "Phosphate minerals in human tissues". Phosphate Miner 351–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61736-2_1210.1007/978-3-642-61736-2_12 ↗
39. Hench LL (1993) An introduction to bioceramics. World scientific10.1142/2028 ↗
40. Gauthier O et al (2001) Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics versus injectable bone substitute: a comparative study 3 and 8 weeks after implantation in rabbit bone. J Mater Sci - Mater Med 12(5):38510.1023/A:1011284517429 ↗
41. Bandyopadhyay A, Bernard S, Xue W, Bose S (2006) Calcium phosphate-based resorbable ceramics: influence of MgO, ZnO, and SiO2 dopants. J Am Ceram Soc 89(9):2675–2688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01207.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01207.x ↗
42. Rahaman MN et al (2011) Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 7(6):2355–2373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.01610.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
43. Katti KS (2004) Biomaterials in total joint replacement. Colloids Surf, B 39(3):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2003.12.00210.1016/j.colsurfb.2003.12.002 ↗
44. GoksenTosun N, Ozer A, Bektas T, Oksuz KE, ErdenTayhan S, Ozdemir T (2023) Silk sericin-hydroxyapatite nanoribbons toward structurally stable osteogenic scaffolds. J Australian Ceramic Soc 59(5):1291–1301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-023-00909-410.1007/s41779-023-00909-4 ↗
45. Kazem-Rostami M, Moghanian A (2017) Hünlich base derivatives as photo-responsive Λ-shaped hinges. Org Chem Front 4(2):224–228. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6QO00653A10.1039/C6QO00653A ↗
46. Moghanian A et al (2021) Characterization, in vitro bioactivity and biological studies of sol-gel-derived TiO2 substituted 58S bioactive glass. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 18(5):1430–1441. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.1378210.1111/ijac.13782 ↗
47. Hasan ML, Kim B, Padalhin AR, Faruq O, Sultana T, Lee B-T (2019) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioglass microspheres incorporated brushite cement for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng, C 103:109775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.10977510.1016/j.msec.2019.109775 ↗
48. Hench LL (1991) Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 74(7):1487–1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x ↗
49. Kokubo T (1991) Bioactive glass ceramics: properties and applications. Biomaterials 12(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(91)90194-F10.1016/0142-9612(91)90194-F ↗
50. Kokubo T, Takadama H (2006) How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27(15):2907–2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
51. Yu Y, Bacsik Z, Edén M (2018) Contrasting in vitro apatite growth from bioactive glass surfaces with that of spontaneous precipitation. Materials 11(9):1690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1109169010.3390/ma11091690 ↗
52. Workie AB, Shih S-J (2022) A study of bioactive glass–ceramic’s mechanical properties, apatite formation, and medical applications. RSC Adv 12(36):23143–23152. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA03235J10.1039/D2RA03235J ↗
53. Kokubo T, Kim H-M, Kawashita M (2003) Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties. Biomaterials 24(13):2161–2175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00044-910.1016/S0142-9612(03)00044-9 ↗
54. Clark A, Hench L, Paschall H (1976) The influence of surface chemistry on implant interface histology: a theoretical basis for implant materials selection. J Biomed Mater Res 10(2):161–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.82010020210.1002/jbm.820100202 ↗
55. Khorsandi D, Moghanian A, Nazari R, Arabzadeh G, Borhani S (2016) Personalized medicine: regulation of genes in human skin ageing. J Allergy Ther 7(245):2–11. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6121.100024510.4172/2155-6121.1000245 ↗
56. Moghanian A, Pazhouheshgar A, Ghorbanoghli A (2021) "Nonlinear viscoelastic modeling of synthesized silicate-based bioactive glass/polysulfone composite: theory and medical applications". Silicon 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00900-910.1007/s12633-020-00900-9 ↗
57. Saatchi A, Arani AR, Moghanian A, Mozafari M (2021) Synthesis and characterization of electrospun cerium-doped bioactive glass/chitosan/polyethylene oxide composite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Ceram Int 47(1):260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.13010.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.130 ↗
58. Moghanian A, Tajer MHM, Zohourfazeli M, Miri Z, Yazdi M (2021) Sol-gel derived silicate-based bioactive glass: studies of synergetic effect of zirconium and magnesium on structural and biological characteristics. J Non-Cryst Solids 554:120613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.12061310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120613 ↗
59. Saatchi A, Arani AR, Moghanian A, Mozafari M (2021) Cerium-doped bioactive glass-loaded chitosan/polyethylene oxide nanofiber with elevated antibacterial properties as a potential wound dressing. Ceram Int 47(7):9447–9461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.07810.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.078 ↗
60. Öksüz KE, Kurt BM, Şahin İnan ZD, Hepokur C (2023) "Novel bioactive glass/graphene oxide-coated surgical sutures for soft tissue regeneration". ACS Omega. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c0097810.1021/acsomega.3c00978 ↗
61. Sepulveda P, Jones J, Hench L (2002) In vitro dissolution of melt-derived 45S5 and sol-gel derived 58S bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res 61(2):301–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1020710.1002/jbm.10207 ↗
62. Clupper D, Hench L (2003) Crystallization kinetics of tape cast bioactive glass 45S5. J Non-Cryst Solids 318(1–2):43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(02)01857-410.1016/S0022-3093(02)01857-4 ↗
63. Chen QZ, Thompson ID, Boccaccini AR (2006) 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass–ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27(11):2414–2425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.025 ↗
64. Boccaccini AR, Chen Q, Lefebvre L, Gremillard L, Chevalier J (2007) Sintering, crystallisation and biodegradation behaviour of Bioglass®-derived glass–ceramics. Faraday Discuss 136:27–44. https://doi.org/10.1039/B616539G10.1039/B616539G ↗
65. Lefebvre L, Gremillard L, Chevalier J, Zenati R, Bernache-Assolant D (2008) Sintering behaviour of 45S5 bioactive glass. Acta Biomater 4(6):1894–1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.01910.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.019 ↗
66. Bretcanu O, Chatzistavrou X, Paraskevopoulos K, Conradt R, Thompson I, Boccaccini AR (2009) Sintering and crystallisation of 45S5 Bioglass® powder. J Eur Ceram Soc 29(16):3299–3306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.06.03510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.06.035 ↗
67. Huang R, Pan J, Boccaccini A, Chen Q (2008) A two-scale model for simultaneous sintering and crystallization of glass–ceramic scaffolds for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 4(4):1095–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.02.00410.1016/j.actbio.2008.02.004 ↗
68. Wallace K, Hill R, Pembroke J, Brown C, Hatton P (1999) Influence of sodium oxide content on bioactive glass properties. J Mater Sci - Mater Med 10:697–701. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100891071844610.1023/A:1008910718446 ↗
69. Kansal I et al (2014) Structure, biodegradation behavior and cytotoxicity of alkali-containing alkaline-earth phosphosilicate glasses. Mater Sci Eng, C 44:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.01610.1016/j.msec.2014.08.016 ↗
70. Fernandes HR, Gaddam A, Rebelo A, Brazete D, Stan GE, Ferreira JM (2018) Bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics for healthcare applications in bone regeneration and tissue engineering. Materials 11(12):2530. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1112253010.3390/ma11122530 ↗
71. Li R, Clark AE, Hench LL (1991) An investigation of bioactive glass powders by sol-gel processing. J Appl Biomater 2(4):231–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/jab.77002040310.1002/jab.770020403 ↗
72. Li R, Clark A, Hench L (1991) An investigation of bioactive glass powders by sol-gel processing. J Appl Biomater 2(4):231–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/jab.77002040310.1002/jab.770020403 ↗
73. Sepulveda P, Jones JR, Hench LL (2001) Characterization of melt-derived 45S5 and sol-gel–derived 58S bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res 58(6):734–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1002610.1002/jbm.10026 ↗
74. Fu Q, Saiz E, Rahaman MN, Tomsia AP (2011) Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives. Mater Sci Eng, C 31(7):1245–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.02210.1016/j.msec.2011.04.022 ↗
75. Shih S-J, Chou Y-J, Panjaitan LVP (2013) Synthesis and characterization of spray pyrolyzed mesoporous bioactive glass. Ceram Int 39(8):8773–8779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.04.06410.1016/j.ceramint.2013.04.064 ↗
76. Shih C, Chen H, Huang L, Lu P, Chang H, Chang I (2010) Synthesis and in vitro bioactivity of mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng, C 30(5):657–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.02.00610.1016/j.msec.2010.02.006 ↗
77. Cao W, Hench LL (1996) Bioactive materials. Ceram Int 22(6):493–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-8842(95)00126-310.1016/0272-8842(95)00126-3 ↗
78. Hench L (1994) "Bioactive ceramics: theory and clinical applications". in Bioceramics: Elsevier pp 3–1410.1016/B978-0-08-042144-5.50005-4 ↗
79. Xia W, Chang J (2006) Well-ordered mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBG): a promising bioactive drug delivery system. J Control Release 110(3):522–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.11.00210.1016/j.jconrel.2005.11.002 ↗
80. Hoppe U (2016) "Model considerations of changes in the average M–O coordination numbers of ternary alkali mixed glass former phosphate glasses, A2O–MyOz–P2O5". Phys Chem Glasses-European J Glass Sci Technol Part B 57(6):254–266. https://doi.org/10.13036/17533562.57.6.04110.13036/17533562.57.6.041 ↗
81. Ahmed I, Lewis M, Olsen I, Knowles J (2004) Phosphate glasses for tissue engineering: part 1. Processing and characterisation of a ternary-based P2O5–CaO–Na2O glass system. Biomaterials 25(3):491–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00546-510.1016/S0142-9612(03)00546-5 ↗
82. Rahaman MN et al (2011) Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia 7(6):2355–2373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.01610.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
83. Salih V, Franks K, James M, Hastings G, Knowles J, Olsen I (2000) Development of soluble glasses for biomedical use part II: the biological response of human osteoblast cell lines to phosphate-based soluble glasses. J Mater Sci - Mater Med 11:615–620. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100890161267410.1023/A:1008901612674 ↗
84. Chen F, Zhang W, Liu S (2020) Porous glass-ceramics derived from MgO–CuO–TiO2–P2O5 glasses with different additions of Fe2O3. Ceram Int 46(5):6560–6566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.14010.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.140 ↗
85. Babu MM, Rao PV, Govindan NP, Gujjala R, Prasad PS (2023) "Structural and in vitro bioactivity of phosphate-based glasses for bone regeneration," in Advances in Glass Research: Springer, pp 113–15210.1007/978-3-031-20266-7_4 ↗
86. Ege D, Nawaz Q, Beltrán AM, Boccaccini AR (2022) Effect of boron-doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles on C2C12 cell viability and differentiation: potential for muscle tissue application. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 8(12):5273–5283. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c0087610.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00876 ↗
87. Uluisik I, Karakaya HC, Koc A (2018) The importance of boron in biological systems. J Trace Elem Med Biol 45:156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2017.10.00810.1016/j.jtemb.2017.10.008 ↗
88. Armstrong TA, Spears JW, Crenshaw TD, Nielsen FH (2000) Boron supplementation of a semipurified diet for weanling pigs improves feed efficiency and bone strength characteristics and alters plasma lipid metabolites. J Nutr 130(10):2575–2581. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.10.257510.1093/jn/130.10.2575 ↗
89. Chapin RE et al (1997) The effects of dietary boron on bone strength in rats. Toxicol Sci 35(2):205–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/35.2.20510.1093/toxsci/35.2.205 ↗
90. Tepedelen BE, Soya E, Korkmaz M (2016) Boric acid reduces the formation of DNA double strand breaks and accelerates wound healing process. Biol Trace Elem Res 174:309–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-016-0729-910.1007/s12011-016-0729-9 ↗
91. Oluwatosin DA, El Mabrouk K, Bricha M (2023) "A review on borate bioactive glasses (BBG): effect of doping elements, degradation, and applications". J Mater Chem B. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TB02505A10.1039/D2TB02505A ↗
92. Schuhladen K et al (2021) Influence of the replacement of silica by boron trioxide on the properties of bioactive glass scaffolds. Int J Appl Glas Sci 12(3):293–31210.1111/ijag.15894 ↗
93. Wright AC (2010) Borate structures: crystalline and vitreous. Phys Chem Glasses-European J Glass Sci Technol Part B 51(1):1–39
94. Gu Y, Huang W, Rahaman MN, Day DE (2013) Bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects implanted with fibrous scaffolds composed of a mixture of silicate and borate bioactive glasses. Acta Biomater 9(11):9126–9136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.03910.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.039 ↗
95. Liu X, Rahaman MN, Day DE (2013) Conversion of melt-derived microfibrous borate (13–93B3) and silicate (45S5) bioactive glass in a simulated body fluid. J Mater Sci - Mater Med 24:583–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4831-z10.1007/s10856-012-4831-z ↗
96. Liang W, Rahaman MN, Day DE, Marion NW, Riley GC, Mao JJ (2008) Bioactive borate glass scaffold for bone tissue engineering. J Non-Cryst Solids 354(15–16):1690–1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.10.00310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.10.003 ↗
97. Schuhladen K, Wang X, Hupa L, Boccaccini AR (2018) Dissolution of borate and borosilicate bioactive glasses and the influence of ion (Zn, Cu) doping in different solutions. J Non-Cryst Solids 502:22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.08.03710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.08.037 ↗
98. Sengupta S, Michalek M, Liverani L, Švančárek P, Boccaccini AR, Galusek D (2021) Preparation and characterization of sintered bioactive borate glass tape. Mater Lett 282:128843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12884310.1016/j.matlet.2020.128843 ↗
99. Thyparambil NJ, Gutgesell LC, Hurley CC, Flowers LE, Day DE, Semon JA (2020) Adult stem cell response to doped bioactive borate glass. J Mater Sci - Mater Med 31:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6353-410.1007/s10856-019-6353-4 ↗
100. Gobbo VA et al (2023) Surface modification of silicate, borosilicate and phosphate bioactive glasses to improve/control protein adsorption: part I. Ceram Int 49(1):1261–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.10510.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.105 ↗