Nano and traditional copper and zinc antifouling coatings: metal release and impact on marine sessile invertebrate communities
Source abstract
Abstract
Artificial surfaces in coastal waters and offshore oceans, including boat hulls, docks, and offshore structures, are invariably colonized, or fouled, by a host of sessile species known collectively as fouling communities. Fouling has great economic impacts on shipping and other marine industries and plays an important role in the spread of marine invasive species across the globe. The main strategy to prevent fouling of artificial surfaces is application of antifouling coatings containing varying concentrations and mixtures of biocides. Presently, copper and zinc are popular antifouling biocides, and the latter is gaining in usage due to the known toxic characteristics of copper in the marine environment and consequent regulation and consumer opinion. Nanomaterials, including Cu and ZnO nanoparticles, have been explored as a way to efficiently deliver biocides from coating matrices. Here, we examine the efficacy and biocide release characteristics of several copper- and zinc-based antifouling coatings, including formulations containing traditional micron-sized Cu and ZnO particles and two containing copper and ZnO nanoparticles, respectively. Most of the antifouling coatings tested significantly reduced the abundance and biodiversity of the fouling community in the three study locations across California. Invasive species were suppressed by most coatings at similar levels to natives, suggesting that in general, antifouling coatings do not favor invasive species. We found that zinc-based antifouling coatings were similar and in some cases better performing than copper, despite the generally lower toxicity of zinc to aquatic organisms compared with copper. The performance of zinc-based coatings, moreover, was not directly related to the amount of zinc released into the water or their zinc content. Nano-based coatings did not offer any clear advantages over non-nano coatings, either in the degree of Zn leaching or fouling suppression. Coating matrix properties clearly are an important factor affecting the efficacy and biocide leaching rate of antifouling coatings.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry · Marine Ecology and Invasive Species · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Adeleye AS (2015) Influence of phytoplankton and extracellular polymeric substances on the fate of engineered nanomaterials in natural aquatic systems. PhD Thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara
2. Adeleye AS, Conway JR, Perez T, Rutten P, Keller AA (2014) Influence of extracellular polymeric substances on the long-term fate, dissolution, and speciation of copper-based nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 48:12561–1256810.1021/es5033426 ↗
3. Adeleye AS, Oranu EA, Tao M, Keller AA (2016) Release and detection of nanosized copper from a commercial antifouling paint. Water Res 102:374–38210.1016/j.watres.2016.06.056 ↗
4. Adeleye AS, Pokhrel S, Mädler L, Keller AA (2018) Influence of nanoparticle doping on the colloidal stability and toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in synthetic and natural waters. Water Res 132:12–2210.1016/j.watres.2017.12.069 ↗
5. Albrecht TWJ, Addai-Mensah J, Fornasiero D (2011) Effect of pH, concentration and temperature on copper and zinc hydroxide formation/precipitation in solution. Chemeca 2011: Engineering a Better World: Sydney Hilton Hotel, NSW, Australia, 18-21 September 2011:2100
6. Alzieu C (1998) Tributyltin: case study of a chronic contaminant in the coastal environment. Ocean Coast Manag 40:23–3610.1016/S0964-5691(98)00036-2 ↗
7. Anderson M, Willis T (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84:511–52510.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0511:CAOPCA]2.0.CO;2 ↗
8. Banerjee I, Pangule R, Kane R (2011) Antifouling coatings: recent developments in the Design of Surfaces that prevent fouling by proteins, bacteria, and marine organisms. Adv Mater 23:690–71810.1002/adma.201001215 ↗
9. Bellas J, Beiras R, Mariño-Balsa JC, Fernández N (2005) Toxicity of organic compounds to marine invertebrate embryos and larvae: a comparison between the sea urchin embryogenesis bioassay and alternative test species. Ecotoxicology 14:337–35310.1007/s10646-004-6370-y ↗
10. Bixler G, Theiss A, Bhushan B, Lee S (2014) Anti-fouling properties of microstructured surfaces bio-inspired by rice leaves and butterfly wings. J Colloid Interface Sci 419:114–13310.1016/j.jcis.2013.12.019 ↗
11. Callow J, Callow M (2011) Trends in the development of environmentally friendly fouling-resistant marine coatings. Nat Commun 2:1–1010.1038/ncomms1251 ↗
12. Carlton J, Geller J (1993) Ecological roulette: the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261:78–8210.1126/science.261.5117.78 ↗
13. Ciriminna R, Bright F, Pagliaro M (2015) Ecofriendly antifouling marine coatings. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 3:559–56510.1021/sc500845n ↗
14. Contreras L, Medina MH, Andrade S, Oppliger V, Correa JA (2007) Effects of copper on early developmental stages of Lessonia nigrescens Bory (Phaeophyceae). Environ Pollut 145:75–8310.1016/j.envpol.2006.03.051 ↗
15. Conway JR, Adeleye AS, Gardea-Torresdey J, Keller AA (2015) Aggregation, dissolution, and transformation of copper nanoparticles in natural waters. Environ Sci Technol 49:2749–275610.1021/es504918q ↗
16. Dahms H, Dobretsov S, Qian P (2004) The effect of bacterial and diatom biofilms on the settlement of the bryozoan Bugula neritina. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 313:191–20910.1016/j.jembe.2004.08.005 ↗
17. Floerl O, Inglis G (2005) Starting the invasion pathway: the interaction between source populations and human transport vectors. Biol Invasions 7:589–60610.1007/s10530-004-0952-8 ↗
18. Franklin NM, Rogers NJ, Apte SC, Batley GE, Gadd GE, Casey PS (2007) Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate ZnO, bulk ZnO, and ZnCl2 to a freshwater microalga (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata): the importance of particle solubility. Environ Sci Technol 41:8484–849010.1021/es071445r ↗
19. Girling JA, Thomas KV, Brooks SJ, Smith DJ, Shahsavari E, Ball AS (2015) A macroalgal germling bioassay to assess biocide concentrations in marine waters. Mar Pollut Bull 91:82–8610.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.12.025 ↗
20. Grosholz E (2002) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:22–2710.1016/S0169-5347(01)02358-8 ↗
21. Heinlaan M, Ivask A, Blinova I, Dubourguier H-C, Kahru A (2008) Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. Chemosphere 71:1308–131610.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.047 ↗
22. Jarvis TA, Miller RJ, Lenihan HS, Bielmyer GK (2013) Toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles to the copepod, exposed through a phytoplankton diet. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 32(6):1264–126910.1002/etc.2180 ↗
23. Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–37510.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x ↗
24. Keller AA, Adeleye AS, Conway JR, Garner KL, Zhao L, Cherr GN, Hong J, Gardea-Torresdey JL, Godwin HA, Hanna S, Ji Z, Kaweeteerawat C, Lin S, Lenihan HS, Miller RJ, Nel AE, Peralta-Videa JR, Walker SL, Taylor AA, Torres-Duarte C, Zink JI, Zuverza-Mena N (2017) Comparative environmental fate and toxicity of copper nanomaterials. NanoImpact 7:28–4010.1016/j.impact.2017.05.003 ↗
25. Keller AA, Wang H, Zhou D, Lenihan HS, Cherr G, Cardinale BJ, Miller R, Ji Z (2010) Stability and Aggregation of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Natural Aqueous Matrices. Environmental Science & Technology 44(6):1962–196710.1021/es902987d ↗
26. King F (2002) Corrosion of copper in alkaline chloride environments. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm
27. Kvilekval K, Fedorov D, Obara B, Singh A, Manjunath B (2010) Bisque: a platform for bioimage analysis and management. Bioinformatics 26:544–55210.1093/bioinformatics/btp699 ↗
28. Lagerström M, Lindgren JF, Holmqvist A, Dahlström M, Ytreberg E (2018) In situ release rates of Cu and Zn from commercial antifouling paints at different salinities. Mar Pollut Bull 127:289–29610.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.12.027 ↗
29. Lambert G, Sawada H, Yokosawa H, Lambert C (2001) A global overview of ascidian introductions and their possible impact on the endemic fauna. Biol Ascidians:249–25710.1007/978-4-431-66982-1_40 ↗
30. Lee HS, Piron DL (1995) Kinetics of alkaline leaching of pure zinc oxide. Chem Eng Commun 138:127–14310.1080/00986449508936385 ↗
31. Lenihan HS, Oliver JS, Stephenson M (1990) Changes in hard-bottom communities related to boat-mooring and Tributyltin (TBT) in San Diego Bay: a natural experiment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 60:147–15910.3354/meps060147 ↗
32. Leung K, Morritt D, Wheeler J, Whitehouse P, Sorokin N, Toy R, Holt M, Crane M (2001) Can saltwater toxicity be predicted from freshwater data? Mar Pollut Bull 42:1007–101310.1016/S0025-326X(01)00135-7 ↗
33. McKenzie L, Brooks R, Johnston E (2012) A widespread contaminant enhances invasion success of a marine invader. J Appl Ecol 49:767–77310.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02158.x ↗
34. McNeil EM (2018) Antifouling: regulation of biocides in the UK before and after Brexit. Mar Policy 92:58–6010.1016/j.marpol.2018.02.015 ↗
35. Meese R, Tomich P (1992) Dots on the rocks - a comparison of percent cover estimation methods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 165:59–7310.1016/0022-0981(92)90289-M ↗
36. Miller R, Lenihan H, Muller E, Tseng N, Hanna S, Keller A (2010) Impacts of metal oxide nanoparticles on marine phytoplankton. Environ Sci Technol 44:7329–733410.1021/es100247x ↗
37. Miller R, Muller E, Cole B, Martin T, Nisbet R, Bielmyer-Fraser G, Jarvis T, Keller A, Cherr G, Lenihan H (2017) Photosynthetic efficiency predicts toxic effects of metal nanomaterials in phytoplankton. Aquat Toxicol 183:85–9310.1016/j.aquatox.2016.12.009 ↗
38. Molnar J, Gamboa R, Revenga C, Spalding M (2008) Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity. Front Ecol Environ 6:485–49210.1890/070064 ↗
39. Mu Y, Wang Z, Wu F, Zhong B, Yang M, Sun F, Feng C, Jin X, Leung K, Giesy J (2018) Model for predicting toxicities of metals and metalloids in coastal marine environments worldwide. Environ Sci Technol 52:4199–420610.1021/acs.est.7b06654 ↗
40. Nehring S, Kroncke I, Turkay M, Sundermann J (2001) After the TBT era: alternative anti-fouling paints and their ecological risks. Burn Iss North Sea Ecol 31:341–351
41. Neira C, Mendoza G, Levin L, Zirino A, Delgadillo-Hinojosa F, Porrachia M, Deheyn D (2011) Macrobenthic community response to copper in Shelter Island Yacht Basin, San Diego Bay, California. Mar Pollut Bull 62:701–71710.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.01.027 ↗
42. Piola R, Dafforn K, Johnston E (2009) The influence of antifouling practices on marine invasions. Biofouling 25:633–64410.1080/08927010903063065 ↗
43. Qian P, Lau S, Dahms H, Dobretsov S, Harder T (2007) Marine biofilms as mediators of colonization by marine macroorganisms: implications for antifouling and aquaculture. Mar Biotechnol 9:399–41010.1007/s10126-007-9001-9 ↗
44. Raisuddin S, Kwok K, Leung K, Schlenk D, Lee J (2007) The copepod Tigriopus: a promising marine model organism for ecotoxicology and environmental genomics. Aquat Toxicol 83:161–17310.1016/j.aquatox.2007.04.005 ↗
45. Richardson M, Sherman C, Lee R, Bott N, Hirst A (2016) Multiple dispersal vectors drive range expansion in an invasive marine species. Mol Ecol 25:5001–501410.1111/mec.13817 ↗
46. Sathya S, Murthy P, Das A, Sankar G, Venkatnarayanan S, Pandian R, Sathyaseelan V, Pandiyan V, Doble M, Venugopalan V (2016) Marine antifouling property of PMMA nanocomposite films: results of laboratory and field assessment. Intern Biodeter Biodegrad 114:57–6610.1016/j.ibiod.2016.05.026 ↗
47. Schiff K, Brown J, Diehl D, Greenstein D (2007) Extent and magnitude of copper contamination in marinas of the San Diego region, California, USA. Mar Pollut Bull 54:322–32810.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.10.013 ↗
48. Singh N, Turner A (2009) Leaching of copper and zinc from spent antifouling paint particles. Environ Pollut 157:371–37610.1016/j.envpol.2008.10.003 ↗
49. Sunda W, Huntsman S (1996) Antagonisms between cadmium and zinc toxicity and manganese limitation in a coastal diatom. Limnol Oceanogr 41:373–38710.4319/lo.1996.41.3.0373 ↗
50. Turner A (2010) Marine pollution from antifouling paint particles. Mar Pollut Bull 60:159–17110.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.12.004 ↗
51. Voulvoulis N, Scrimshaw M, Lester J (2002) Comparative environmental assessment of biocides used in antifouling paints. Chemosphere 47:789–79510.1016/S0045-6535(01)00336-8 ↗
52. Wahl M (1989) Marine epibiosis. 1: fouling and antifouling - some basic aspects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 58:175–18910.3354/meps058175 ↗
53. Yebra DM, Kiil S, Weinell CE, Dam-Johansen K (2006) Dissolution rate measurements of sea water soluble pigments for antifouling paints: ZnO. Prog Org Coat 56:327–33710.1016/j.porgcoat.2006.06.007 ↗
54. Ytreberg E, Lagerström M, Holmqvist A, Eklund B, Elwing H, Dahlström M, Dahl P, Dahlström M (2017) A novel XRF method to measure environmental release of copper and zinc from antifouling paints. Environ Pollut 225:490–49610.1016/j.envpol.2017.03.014 ↗
55. Yung MMN, Kwok KWH, Djurišić AB, Giesy JP, Leung KMY (2017) Influences of temperature and salinity on physicochemical properties and toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to the marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Sci Rep 7:366210.1038/s41598-017-03889-1 ↗
56. Zhou D, Keller AA (2010) Role of morphology in the aggregation kinetics of ZnO nanoparticles. Water Res 44:2948–295610.1016/j.watres.2010.02.025 ↗