journal article·2017-08Open access

Validation of a particle tracking analysis method for the size determination of nano- and microparticles

Vikram Kestens, Vassili Bozatzidis, Pieter-Jan De Temmerman, Yannic Ramaye, Gert Roebben

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 19· Issue 8

Abstract

Particle tracking analysis (PTA) is an emerging technique suitable for size analysis of particles with external dimensions in the nano- and sub-micrometre scale range. Only limited attempts have so far been made to investigate and quantify the performance of the PTA method for particle size analysis. This article presents the results of a validation study during which selected colloidal silica and polystyrene latex reference materials with particle sizes in the range of 20 nm to 200 nm were analysed with NS500 and LM10-HSBF NanoSight instruments and video analysis software NTA 2.3 and NTA 3.0. Key performance characteristics such as working range, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantification, sensitivity, robustness, precision and trueness were examined according to recommendations proposed by EURACHEM. A model for measurement uncertainty estimation following the principles described in ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 was used for quantifying random and systematic variations. For nominal 50 nm and 100 nm polystyrene and a nominal 80 nm silica reference materials, the relative expanded measurement uncertainties for the three measurands of interest, being the mode, median and arithmetic mean of the number-weighted particle size distribution, varied from about 10% to 12%. For the nominal 50 nm polystyrene material, the relative expanded uncertainty of the arithmetic mean of the particle size distributions increased up to 18% which was due to the presence of agglomerates. Data analysis was performed with software NTA 2.3 and NTA 3.0. The latter showed to be superior in terms of sensitivity and resolution.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Coagulation and Flocculation Studies · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Braun A, Couteau O, Franks K, Kestens V, Roebben G, Lamberty A, Linsinger TPJ (2011) Validation of dynamic light scattering and centrifugal liquid sedimentation methods for nanoparticle characterisation. Adv Powder Technol 22:766–77010.1016/j.apt.2010.11.001 ↗
2. Contado C (2015) Nanomaterials in consumer products: a challenging analytical problem. Front Chem 3:4810.3389/fchem.2015.00048 ↗
3. EC (2011) Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of nanomaterial. (2011/696/EU) OJ L 275, p. 38–40
4. EURACHEM (2014) The fitness for purpose of analytical methods—a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics, https://www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/mv . Accessed 18 Apr 2017
5. De Temmerman P-J, Verleysen E, Lammertyn J, Mast J (2014a) Size measurement uncertainties of near monodisperse, near-spherical nanoparticles using transmission electron microscopy and particle-tracking analysis. J Nanopart Res 16:262810.1007/s11051-014-2628-3 ↗
6. De Temmerman P-J, Lammertyn J, De Ketelaere B, Kestens V, Roebben G, Verleysen E, Mast J (2014b) Measurement uncertainties of size, shape, and surface measurements using transmission electron microscopy of near-monodipserse, near-spherical nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 16:217710.1007/s11051-013-2177-1 ↗
7. Federer WT (1968) Non-negative estimators for components of variance. J R Stat Soc C 17:171–174
8. Filipe V, Hawe A, Jiskoot W (2010) Critical evaluation of nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the measurement of nanoparticles and protein aggregates. Pharm Res 27:796–81010.1007/s11095-010-0073-2 ↗
9. Gallego-Urrea JA, Hammes J, Cornelis G, Hassellöv M (2014) Multimethod 3D characterization of natural plate-like nanoparticles: shape effects on equivalent size measurements. J Nanopart Res 16:238310.1007/s11051-014-2383-5 ↗
10. Gross J, Sayle S, Karow AR, Bakowsky U, Garidel P (2016) Nanoparticle tracking analysis of particle size and concentration detection in suspensions of polymer and protein sample: influence of experimental and data evaluation parameters. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 104:30–4110.1016/j.ejpb.2016.04.013 ↗
11. Hole P, Sillence K, Hannell C et al (2013) Interlaboratory comparison of size measurements on nanoparticles using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). J Nanopart Res 15:210110.1007/s11051-013-2101-8 ↗
12. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 (2008) Uncertainty of measurement—part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
13. Kestens V, Roebben G, Herrmann J et al (2016) Challenges in the size analysis of a silica nanoparticle mixture as candidate certified reference material. J Nanopart Res 18:17110.1007/s11051-016-3474-2 ↗
14. Krueger AB, Carnell P, Carpenter F (2016) Characterization of factors affecting nanoparticle tracking analysis results with synthetic and protein nanoparticles. J Pharm Sci 105:1434–144310.1016/j.xphs.2016.02.005 ↗
15. Linsinger TPJ (2010) Comparison of a measurement result with the certified value. ERM Application Note 1. http://www.erm-crm.org . Accessed 18 Apr 2017
16. Malloy A, Carr B (2006) Nanoparticle tracking analysis—the Halo™ system. Part Part Syst Charact 23:197–20410.1002/ppsc.200601031 ↗
17. McDonald SA, Daniels CA, Davidson JA (1977) Determination of the true size of poly(vinyl chloride) lattices by electron microscopy using a vertical shadowing technique. J Colloid Interface Sci 59:342–34910.1016/0021-9797(77)90017-0 ↗
18. Nicolet A, Meli F, van der Pol E (2016) Inter-laboratory comparison on the size and stability of monodisperse and bimodal synthetic reference particles for standardization of extracellular vesicle measurements. Meas Sci Technol 27:03570110.1088/0957-0233/27/3/035701 ↗
19. Patois E, Capelle MAH, Palais C, Gurny R, Arvinte T (2012) Evaluation of nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) in the characterization of therapeutic antibodies and seasonal influenza vaccines: pros and cons. J Drug Del Sci Technol 22:427–43310.1016/S1773-2247(12)50069-9 ↗
20. Peters RJB, Bouwmeester H, Gottardo S et al (2016) Nanomaterials for products and application in agriculture, feed and food. Trends Food Sci Technol 54:155–16410.1016/j.tifs.2016.06.008 ↗
21. Qian H, Sheetz MP, Elson EL (1991) Single particle tracking—analysis of diffusion and flow in two-dimensional systems. Biophys J 60:910–92110.1016/S0006-3495(91)82125-7 ↗
22. Ramaye Y, Kestens V, Braun A, Linsinger T, Roebben G (2016) The certification of equivalent diameters of silica nanoparticles in aqueous solution: ERM-FD101b. Certification report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
23. Sauvain J-J, Suarez G, Edmé J-L, Bezerra OMPA, Silveira KGS, Amaral LS, Carneiro APS, Chérot-Kornobis N, Sobaszek A, Hulo S (2017) Method validation of nanoparticle tracking analysis to measure pulmonary nanoparticle content: the size distribution in exhaled breath condensate depends on occupational exposure. J Breath Res 11:01601010.1088/1752-7163/aa56dd ↗
24. Tsai D-H, DelRio FW, Keene AM, Tyner KM, MacCuspie RI, Cho TJ, Zachariah MR, Hackley VA (2011) Adsorption and conformation of serum albumin protein on gold nanoparticles investigated using dimensional measurements and in situ spectroscopic methods. Langmuir 27:2464–247710.1021/la104124d ↗
25. Tuoriniemi J, Johnsson A-C JH, Holmberg JP, Gustafsson S, Gallego-Urrea JA, Olsson E, Pettersson JBC, Hassellöv M (2014) Intermethod comparison of the particle size distributions of colloidal silica nanoparticles. Sci Technol Adv Mater 15:03500910.1088/1468-6996/15/3/035009 ↗
26. Walker JG (2012) Improved nano-particle tracking. Meas Sci Technol 23:06560510.1088/0957-0233/23/6/065605 ↗