Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs
Source abstract
Abstract
This article examines the relative positions with respect to nanotechnology research publications of the European Union (EU), the United States (US), Japan, Germany, China, and three Asian Tiger nations (South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan). The analysis uses a dataset of nanotechnology publication records for the time period 1990 through 2006 (part year) extracted from the Science Citation Index obtained through the Web of Science and was developed through a two-stage modularized Boolean approach. The results show that although the EU and the US have the highest number of nanotechnology publications, China and other Asian countries are increasing their publications rapidly, taking an ever-larger proportion of the total. When viewed in terms of the quality-based measure of citations, Asian nanotechnology researchers also show growth in recent years. However, by such citation measures, the US still maintains a strongly dominant position, followed by the EU. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: scientometrics and bibliometrics research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Glanzel W, Meyer M, Plessis M, Thijs B, Magerman T, Schlemmer B, Debackere K, Veugelers R (2003) Nanotechnology, analysis of an emerging domain of scientific and technological endeavor. Report of Steunpunt O&O Statistieken, Leuven, Belgium
2. Heinze T, Shapira P, Senker J, Kuhlmann S (2007) Identifying creative research accomplishments: methodology and results for nanotechnology and human genetics. Scientometrics 70(1):125–15210.1007/s11192-007-0108-6 ↗
3. Hirsch J (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(46):16569–1657210.1073/pnas.0507655102 ↗
4. Huang Z, Chen H, Yip A, Ng G, Guo F, Chen Z, Roco M (2003) Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: country, institution and technology field. J Nanopart Res 5: 333–36310.1023/A:1025556800994 ↗
5. Huang Z, Chen H, Yan L, Roco M (2005) Longitudinal nanotechnology development (1991–2002): National Science Foundation funding and its impact on patents. J Nanopart Res 7:343–37610.1007/s11051-005-5468-3 ↗
6. Hullmann A, Meyer M (2003) Publications and patents in nanotechnology: an overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics 58(3):507–52710.1023/B:SCIE.0000006877.45467.a7 ↗
7. Lin MW, Zhang J (2007) Language trends in nanoscience and technology: the case of Chinese-language publications. Scientometrics 70(3):555–56410.1007/s11192-007-0302-6 ↗
8. Kostoff RN, Stump JA, Johnson D, Murday JS, Lau CGY, Tolles WM (2006) The structure and infrastructure of global nanotechnology literature. J Nanopart Res 8(3–4):301–32110.1007/s11051-005-9035-8 ↗
9. Kostoff RN, Koytcheff RG, Lau CGY (2007) Technical structure of the global nanoscience and nanotechnology literature. J Nanopart Res 9:701–72410.1007/s11051-007-9224-8 ↗
10. Miyazaki K, Islam N (2007) Nanotechnology systems of innovation—An analysis of industry and academia research activities. Technovation 27:661–67510.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.009 ↗
11. Porter A, Youtie J, Shapira P, Schoeneck D (2007) Refining search terms for nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res. (August, Online First)10.1007/s11051-007-9266-y ↗
12. Zhou P, Leydesdorff L (2006) The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Res Policy 35(1):83–10410.1016/j.respol.2005.08.006 ↗
13. Zitt M, Bassecoulard E (2006) Delineating complex scientific fields by a hybrid lexical-citation method: an application to nanosciences. Inform Processing Management 42(6):1513–153110.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.016 ↗
14. Zucker LG, Darby MR (2005) Socio-economic impact of nanoscale science: initial results and Nanobank. Working Paper 11181, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA10.3386/w11181 ↗