Experimental verification of nanoparticle jet minimum quantity lubrication effectiveness in grinding
Source abstract
Abstract
In our experiment, K-P36 precision numerical control surface grinder was used for dry grinding, minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) grinding, nanoparticle jet MQL grinding, and traditional flood grinding of hardened 45 steel. A three-dimensional dynamometer was used to measure grinding force in the experiment. In this research, experiments were conducted to measure and calculate specific tangential grinding force, frictional coefficient, and specific grinding energy, thus verifying the lubrication performance of nanoparticles in surface grinding. Findings present that compared with dry grinding, the specific tangential grinding force of MQL grinding, nanoparticle jet MQL grinding, and flood grinding decreased by 45.88, 62.34, and 69.33 %, respectively. Their frictional coefficient was reduced by 11.22, 29.21, and 32.18 %, and the specific grinding energy declined by 45.89, 62.34, and 69.45 %, respectively. Nanoparticle jet MQL presented ideal lubrication effectiveness, which was attributed to the friction oil film with strong antifriction and anti-wear features formed by nanoparticles on the grinding wheel/workpiece interface. Moreover, lubricating properties of nanoparticles of the same size (50 nm) but different types were verified through experimentation. In our experiment, ZrO2 nanoparticles, polycrystal diamond (PCD) nanoparticles, and MoS2 nanoparticles were used in the comparison of nanoparticle jet MQL grinding. The experimental results manifest that MoS2 nanoparticles exhibited the optimal lubricating effectiveness, followed by PCD nanoparticles. Our research also integrated the properties of different nanoparticles to analyze the lubrication mechanisms of different nanoparticles. The experiment further verified the impact of nanoparticle concentration on the effectiveness of nanoparticle jet MQL in grinding. The experimental results demonstrate that when the nanoparticle mass fraction was 6 %, the minimum specific tangential grinding force, frictional coefficient, and specific grinding energy were 1.285 N/mm, 0.382, and 57.825 J/mm3, respectively. When nanoparticle mass fraction was smaller than 6 %, lubrication effects of nanoparticle jet MQL increased with the rising nanoparticle mass fraction. When nanoparticle mass fraction was larger than 6 %, lubrication effects of nanoparticle jet MQL decreased with the rising nanoparticle mass fraction.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Baheti U, Guo C, Malkin S (1998) Environmentally conscious cooling and lubrication for grinding. Proc Int Semin Improv Mach Tool Perform 2:643–654
2. Barczak LM, Batako ADL, Morgan MN (2010) A study of plane surface grinding under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) conditions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(11):977–98510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.07.005 ↗
3. Choi C, Jung M, Choi Y, Lee J, Oh J (2011) Tribological properties of lubricating oil-based nanofluids with metal/carbon nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11(1):368–37110.1166/jnn.2011.3227 ↗
4. Da Silva LR, Bianchi EC, Fusse RY, Catai RE, França TV, Aguiar PR (2007) Analysis of surface integrity for minimum quantity lubricant-MQL in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(2):412–41810.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.015 ↗
5. Dong B, Cao L, Su G, Liu W, Qu H, Zhai H (2010) Water-soluble ZnS: Mn/ZnS core/shell nanoparticles prepared by a novel two-step method. J Alloy Compd 492(1):363–36710.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.096 ↗
6. Ginzburg BM, Shibaev LA, Kireenko OF, Shepelevskii AA, Baidakova MV, Sitnikova AA (2002) Antiwear effect of Fullerene C60 additives to lubricating oils. Russ J Appl Chem 75(8):1330–133510.1023/A:1020929515246 ↗
7. Hu KH, Hu XG, Xu YF, Huang F, Liu JS (2010) The effect of morphology on the tribological properties of MoS2 in liquid paraffin. Tribol Lett 40(1):155–16510.1007/s11249-010-9651-z ↗
8. Hwang Y, Park HS, Lee JK, Jung WH (2006) Thermal conductivity and lubrication characteristics of nanofluids. Curr Appl Phys 6(1):e67–e7110.1016/j.cap.2006.01.014 ↗
9. Jia DZ, Li CH, Zhang DK, Wang S, Hou YL (2014) Investigation into the formation mechanism and distribution characteristics of suspended microparticles in MQL grinding. Recent Pat Mech Eng 7(1):52–6210.2174/2212797606666131231000234 ↗
10. Jin T, Stephenson DJ (2008) A study of the convection heat transfer coefficients of grinding fluids. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 57(1):367–37010.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.074 ↗
11. Kalita PARASH, Malshe AP, Jiang WENPING, Shih AJ (2010) Tribological study of nano lubricant integrated soybean oil for minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) grinding. Trans NAMRI/SME 38:137–144
12. Kalita P, Malshe AP, Arun Kumar S, Yoganath VG, Gurumurthy T (2012) Study of specific energy and friction coefficient in minimum quantity lubrication grinding using oil-based nanolubricants. J Manuf Process 18:1–9
13. Kaynak Y (2014) Evaluation of machining performance in cryogenic machining of Inconel 718 and comparison with dry and MQL machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72:919–93310.1007/s00170-014-5683-0 ↗
14. Lee PH, Nam TS, Li C, Lee SW (2010) Environmentally-friendly nano-fluid minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) meso-scale grinding process using nano-diamond particles. In: Manufacturing automation (ICMA), 2010 international conference on IEEE, pp 44–4910.1109/ICMA.2010.27 ↗
15. Lee PH, Nam JS, Li C, Lee SW (2012) An experimental study on micro-grinding process with nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(3):331–33810.1007/s12541-012-0042-2 ↗
16. Li BM, Zhao B (2003) Modern grinding technology. China Machine Press, Beijing
17. Li CH, Wang S, Zhang Q, Jia DZ (2013) Evaluation of minimum quantity lubrication grinding with nano-particles and recent related patents. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 7(2):167–18110.2174/18722105113079990001 ↗
18. Liu ZR (2011) The research of heat transfer theory by nanofluids jet lubrication and the evaluation of the surface integrity in grinding. Qingdao Technological University, Qingdao
19. Malkin S (2002) Grinding technology theory and application. Northeastern University Press, Shenyang
20. Malkin S, Guo C (2007) Thermal analysis of grinding. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 56(2):760–78210.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.005 ↗
21. Mao C, Tang XJ, Zou HF, Huang XM, Zhou ZX (2012a) Investigation of grinding characteristic using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(10):1745–175210.1007/s12541-012-0229-6 ↗
22. Mao C, Tang XJ, Zou HF, Zhou ZX, Yin WW (2012b) Experimental investigation of surface quality for minimum quantity oil–water lubrication grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59:93–10010.1007/s00170-011-3491-3 ↗
23. Mao C, Zou HF, Huang XM, Zhang JA, Zhou ZX (2013) The influence of spraying parameters on grinding performance for nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(9–12):1791–179910.1007/s00170-012-4143-y ↗
24. Nguyen TK, Do I, Kwon P (2012) A tribological study of vegetable oil enhanced by nano-platelets and implication in MQL machining. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(7):1077–108310.1007/s12541-012-0141-0 ↗
25. Pei HJ, Zhang CY, Zhang WW (2007) MQL machining trace cooling lubrication system. China’s Manuf Ind Informatiz 36(19):136–142
26. Sadeghi MH, Haddad MJ, Tawakoli T, Emami M (2009) Minimal quantity lubrication-MQL in grinding of Ti–6Al–4 V titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(5–6):487–50010.1007/s00170-008-1857-y ↗
27. Shaji S, Radhakrishnan V (2002) Investigations on the application of solid lubricants in grinding. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B 216(10):1325–134310.1243/095440502320405421 ↗
28. Shen B, Shih AJ, Tung SC (2008a) Application of nanofluids in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Tribol Trans 51(6):730–73710.1080/10402000802071277 ↗
29. Shen B, Malshe AP, Kalita P, Shih AJ (2008b) Performance of novel MoS2 nanoparticles based grinding fluids in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Trans NAMRI/SME 36:357–364
30. Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2012) Environmentally conscious machining of difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 57(0890–6955):83–10110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.02.002 ↗
31. Sridharan U, Malkin S (2009) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) with nanofluid on grinding behavior and thermal distortion. Trans NAMRI/SME 37:629–636
32. Tawakoli T, Hadad MJ, Sadeghi MH (2010) Influence of oil mist parameters on minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(6):521–53110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.03.005 ↗
33. Tawakoli T, Hadad MJ, Daneshi A, Sadeghi MH, Sadeghi B (2011) Study on the effects of abrasive and coolant–lubricant types on minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding. Adv Mater Res 325:231–23710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.325.231 ↗
34. Wang S (2013) Generating mechanism and experimental investigation on surface topography in the grinding process using MQL by nano-particles jet. Qingdao Technological University, Qingdao
35. Wang S, Li CH, Zhang Q (2013) Evaluation of grinding performance in minimum quantity lubrication with nanoparticles. Manuf Technol Mach Tool 2:86–89
36. Wu KZ, Chen YJ, Zhu DD (2005) The dry cutting technology and its tools. Cem Carbide 22(1):47–50
37. Xiu SD, Geng ZJ (2010) Study on MQL in point grinding process for green manufacturing. Adv Mater Res 97–101:2356–2360
38. Zhang Q, Li CH, Wang S (2013) Analysis of cooling characteristic for minimum quantity lubrication with nanoparticles. Manuf Technol Mach Tool 3:91–96