The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: convergence of knowledge, technology, and society
Source abstract
Abstract
Convergence of knowledge and technology for the benefit of society (CKTS) is the core opportunity for progress in the twenty-first century. CKTS is defined as the escalating and transformative interactions among seemingly different disciplines, technologies, communities, and domains of human activity to achieve mutual compatibility, synergism, and integration, and through this process to create added value and branch out to meet shared goals. Convergence has been progressing by stages over the past several decades, beginning with nanotechnology for the material world, followed by convergence of nanotechnology, biotechnology, information, and cognitive science (NBIC) for emerging technologies. CKTS is the third level of convergence. It suggests a general process to advance creativity, innovation, and societal progress based on five general purpose principles: (1) the interdependence of all components of nature and society, (2) decision analysis for research, development, and applications based on dynamic system-logic deduction, (3) enhancement of creativity and innovation through evolutionary processes of convergence that combines existing principles and divergence that generates new ones, (4) the utility of higher-level cross-domain languages to generate new solutions and support transfer of new knowledge, and (5) the value of vision-inspired basic research embodied in grand challenges. CKTS is a general purpose approach in knowledge society. It allows society to answer questions and resolve problems that isolated capabilities cannot, as well as to create new competencies, knowledge, and technologies on this basis. Possible solutions are outlined for key societal challenges in the next decade, including support for foundational emerging technologies NBIC to penetrate essential platforms of human activity and create new industries and jobs, improve lifelong wellness and human potential, achieve personalized and integrated healthcare and education, and secure a sustainable quality of life for all. This paper provides a 10-year “NBIC2” vision within a longer-term framework for converging technology and human progress outlined in a previous study of unifying principles across “NBIC” fields that began with nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology, and technologies based on and enabling cognitive science (Roco and Bainbridge, Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive sciences, 2003).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. AAAS American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989) Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Oxford University Press, New York. http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm . Accessed 27 Aug 2013
2. Alivisatos, AP, Chun M, Church GM, Greenspan RJ, Roukes ML, Yuste R (2012) The brain activity map project and the challenge of functional connectomics. Neuron 74(21):1–5
3. Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) (2006a) Managing Nano-bio-info-cogno Innovations. Springer, Berlin
4. Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) (2006b) Progress in convergence: technologies for human wellbeing. New York Academy of Sciences, New York
5. Dunbar RIM (2003) The social brain: mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Ann Rev Anthropol 32:163–18110.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158 ↗
6. Fichman RG (2004) Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: emerging concepts and methods. J Assoc Inf Syst 5(8):314–355
7. Gregorian V (2004) Colleges must reconstruct the unity of knowledge. Chron High Education 50(39):B2
8. Hood L, Flores M (2012) A personal view on systems medicine and the emergence of proactive P4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory. New Biotechnol 29(6):613–72410.1016/j.nbt.2012.03.004 ↗
9. Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K (eds) (2009) The fourth paradigm, data-intensive scientific discovery. Redmond, Philadelphia
10. Kurzweil R (1999) The age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence. Viking, Penguin Group, New York
11. Langer EJ (1997) The power of mindful learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston
12. Mouw T, Kalleberg AL (2010) Occupations and the structure of wage inequality in the United States, 1980s to 2000s. Am Sociol Rev 75(3):402–43110.1177/0003122410363564 ↗
13. National Science Board (2012) Science and engineering indicators. National Science Foundation, New York
14. NRC (National Research Council) (2010) Research at the intersection of the physical and life sciences. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C
15. NRC (National Research Council) (2012) Research Universities and the Future of America: ten breakthrough Actions vital to our nation’s prosperity and security. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
16. Reif, R, Barrett C (2013) Science must be spared Washington’s axe. Financial Times, Upper Saddle River
17. Roco MC (2002) Coherence and divergence of megatrends in science and engineering. J Nanoparticle Res 4:9–1910.1023/A:1020157027792 ↗
18. Roco MC (2011) The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years. J Nanoparticle Res 13:427–44510.1007/s11051-010-0192-z ↗
19. Roco MC (2012) Technology convergence, Ch. 24. In: Bainbridge WS (ed) Leadership in science and technology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 210–21910.4135/9781412994231.n24 ↗
20. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2001) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Springer, Dordrecht. http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/NSET.Societal.Implications/nanosi.pdf . Accessed 27 Aug 201310.1007/978-94-017-3012-9 ↗
21. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance: integrating from the nanoscale. J Nanoparticle Res 4:281–29510.1023/A:1021152023349 ↗
22. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2003) Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive sciences. Springer, New York http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/Report/ . Accessed 27 Aug 2013
23. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2007) Nanotechnology: societal implications. Springer, New York
24. Roco MC, Montemagno C (2004) The co-evolution of human potential and converging technologies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York
25. Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P (eds) (1999) Nanotechnology research directions: vision for the next decade. IWGN Workshop report 1999. National Science and Technology Council, Springer (2000), Washington, DC. http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/IWGN.Research.Directions/ . Accessed 27 Aug 2013
26. Roco MC, Mirkin CA, Hersam MC (2011) Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: retrospective and outlook. Springer, New York. http://www.wtec.org/nano2/Nanotechnology_Research_Directions_to_2020/ . Accessed 27 Aug 201310.1007/978-94-007-1168-6 ↗
27. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS, Tonn B, Whitesides G (2013) Converging knowledge, technology and society: beyond convergence of Nano-Bio-Info-Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Boston http://www.wtec.org/NBIC2-report . Accessed 27 Aug 2013
28. Sadava D, Oh J (2000) Clinton speaks of science, technology. Calif Tech 1(14):1–2
29. Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information rules. Harvard Business Press, Boston
30. Sharp PA, Langer R (2011) Promoting convergence in biomedical science. Science 222(6042):52710.1126/science.1205008 ↗
31. Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s quadrant: basic Science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
32. UN (United Nations) (2011) Sustainability and equity: a better future for all. United Nations, New York
33. UN (United Nations) (2012a) Millennium development goals report. United Nations, New York
34. UN (United Nations) (2012b) Realizing the future we want for all. United Nations, New York
35. UN (United Nations) (2012c) Report of the United Nations conference on sustainable development. United Nations, New York
36. UN (United Nations) (2012d) Building a sustainable and desirable economy-in-society-in-nature. United Nations, New York
37. Wilson EO (1999) Consilience: the unity of knowledge. Random House, New York