journal article·2014-01

Analysis of cellulose nanocrystal rod lengths by dynamic light scattering and electron microscopy

Yaman Boluk, Christophe Danumah

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 16· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

A method to characterize the length (L) of rod-like cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) particles is described. It is based on dynamic light scattering (DLS) and electron microscopy. Measurement of translational diffusion coefficient from DLS along with diameter measurements from electron microscopy is used in Broersma translational diffusion coefficient equation to calculate the CNC particle L. For wood based CNC rods, diameter of 15 nm measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and translational diffusion coefficient of 5.21 × 10−12 m2/s measured by DLS give particle L of 271 nm from Broersma’s relation. This one and other calculated L values for various rod-like particles are in good agreement with the L of the particles measured either by transmission or SEM.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Material Properties and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S (2001) Steric stabilization of a cellulose microcrystal suspension by poly(ethylene glycol) grafting. Langmuir 17(1):21–27. doi: 10.1021/la001070m10.1021/la001070m ↗
2. Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Dufresne A (2005) Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules 6(2):612–626. doi: 10.1021/bm049368510.1021/bm0493685 ↗
3. Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG (2005) Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6(2):1048–105410.1021/bm049300p ↗
4. Bercea M, Navard P (2000) Shear dynamics of aqueous suspensions of cellulose whiskers. Macromolecules 33(16):6011–6016. doi: 10.1021/ma000417p10.1021/ma000417p ↗
5. Boluk Y, Lahiji R, Zhao L, McDermott MT (2011) Suspension viscosities and shape parameter of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC). Colloids Surf A 377(1–3):297–30310.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.01.003 ↗
6. Boluk Y, Zhao L, Incani V (2012) Dispersions of nanocrystalline cellulose in aqueous polymer solutions: structure formation of colloidal rods. Langmuir 28(14):6114–612310.1021/la2035449 ↗
7. Broersma S (1960) Viscous force constant for a closed cylinder. J Chem Phys 32:163210.1063/1.1730995 ↗
8. Capadona JR, Shanmuganathan K, Trittschuh S, Seidel S, Rowan SJ, Weder C (2009) Polymer nanocomposites with nanowhiskers isolated from microcrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 10(4):712–71610.1021/bm8010903 ↗
9. de la Torre JG, Bloomfield VA (1981) Hydrodynamic properties of complex, rigid, biological macromolecules: theory and applications. Q Rev Biophys 14(01):81–13910.1017/S0033583500002080 ↗
10. De Rodriguez NLG, Thielemans W, Dufresne A (2006) Sisal cellulose whiskers reinforced polyvinyl acetate nanocomposites. Cellulose 13(3):261–27010.1007/s10570-005-9039-7 ↗
11. De Souza Lima MM, Wong JT, Paillet M, Borsali R, Pecora R (2002) Translational and rotational dynamics of rodlike cellulose whiskers. Langmuir 19(1):24–29. doi: 10.1021/la020475z10.1021/la020475z ↗
12. Dong XM, Revol J-F, Gray DG (1998) Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 5(1):19–3210.1023/A:1009260511939 ↗
13. Eichhorn SJ (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 7(2):303–31510.1039/C0SM00142B ↗
14. Elazzouzi-Hafraoui S, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Heux L, Dubreuil F, Rochas C (2008) The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 9(1):57–65. doi: 10.1021/bm700769p10.1021/bm700769p ↗
15. Finsy R (1994) Particle sizing by quasi-elastic light scattering. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 52:79–14310.1016/0001-8686(94)80041-3 ↗
16. Glatter O, Hofer M, Jorde C, Eigner W-D (1985) Interpretation of elastic light-scattering data in real space. J Colloid Interface Sci 105(2):577–58610.1016/0021-9797(85)90333-9 ↗
17. Habibi Y, Goffin A-L, Schiltz N, Duquesne E, Dubois P, Dufresne A (2008) Bionanocomposites based on poly (ε-caprolactone)-grafted cellulose nanocrystals by ring-opening polymerization. J Mater Chem 18(41):5002–501010.1039/b809212e ↗
18. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110(6):3479–350010.1021/cr900339w ↗
19. Hamad WY, Hu TQ (2010) Structure–process–yield interrelations in nanocrystalline cellulose extraction. Can J Chem Eng 88(3):392–402. doi: 10.1002/cjce.2029810.1002/cjce.20298 ↗
20. Kimura F, Kimura T, Tamura M, Hirai A, Ikuno M, Horii F (2005) Magnetic alignment of the chiral nematic phase of a cellulose microfibril suspension. Langmuir 21(5):2034–203710.1021/la0475728 ↗
21. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H-P, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 44(22):3358–339310.1002/anie.200460587 ↗
22. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(24):5438–5466. doi: 10.1002/anie.20100127310.1002/anie.201001273 ↗
23. Kovacs T, Naish V, O’Connor B, Blaise C, Gagné F, Hall L, Trudeau V, Martel P (2010) An ecotoxicological characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC). Nanotoxicology 4(3):255–27010.3109/17435391003628713 ↗
24. Lehner D, Lindner H, Glatter O (2000) Determination of the translational and rotational diffusion coefficients of rodlike particles using depolarized dynamic light scattering. Langmuir 16(4):1689–169510.1021/la9910273 ↗
25. Maeda T, Fujime S (1985) Dynamic light-scattering study of suspensions of fd virus. Application of a theory of light-scattering spectrum of weakly bending filaments. Macromolecules 18(12):2430–243710.1021/ma00154a016 ↗
26. Pecora R (2000) Dynamic light scattering measurement of nanometer particles in liquids. J Nanopart Res 2(2):123–13110.1023/A:1010067107182 ↗
27. Ramirez L, Dufresne A (2011) A review of cellulose nanocrystals and nanocomposites. Tappi J 10(4):9–1610.32964/TJ10.4.9 ↗
28. Revol J-F (1982) On the cross-sectional shape of cellulose crystallites in Valonia ventricosa. Carbohydr Polym 2(2):123–13410.1016/0144-8617(82)90058-3 ↗
29. Revol JF, Godbout L, Dong XM, Gray DG, Chanzy H, Maret G (1994) Chiral nematic suspensions of cellulose crystallites—phase-separation and magnetic-field orientation. Liq Cryst 16(1):127–13410.1080/02678299408036525 ↗
30. Revol J-F, Godbout DL, Gray DG (1997) Solidified liquid crystals of cellulose with optically variable properties. US Patent
31. Terech P, Chazeau L, Cavaille J (1999) A small-angle scattering study of cellulose whiskers in aqueous suspensions. Macromolecules 32(6):1872–187510.1021/ma9810621 ↗
32. Tirado MM, de La Torre JG (1979) Translational friction coefficients of rigid, symmetric top macromolecules. Application to circular cylinders. J Chem Phys 71:258110.1063/1.438613 ↗
33. Ureña-Benavides EE, Kitchens CL (2012) Static light scattering of triaxial nanoparticle suspensions in the Rayleigh–Gans–Debye regime: application to cellulose nanocrystals. RSC Adv 2(3):1096–110510.1039/C1RA00391G ↗
34. van der Zande BM, Dhont JK, Böhmer MR, Philipse AP (2000) Colloidal dispersions of gold rods characterized by dynamic light scattering and electrophoresis. Langmuir 16(2):459–46410.1021/la990043x ↗
35. Wierenga AM, Philipse AP (1997) Low-shear viscosities of (semi-)dilute, aqueous dispersions of charged boehmite rods: dynamic scaling of double layer effects. Langmuir 13(17):4574–4582. doi: 10.1021/la970047710.1021/la9700477 ↗