journal article·2012-08

Effects of solid–gas coupling and pore and particle microstructures on the effective gaseous thermal conductivity in aerogels

Jun-Jie Zhao, Yuan-Yuan Duan, Xiao-Dong Wang, Bu-Xuan Wang

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 14· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

An analytical model was developed to predict the pressure-dependent gaseous thermal conductivity in aerogels based on the spherical porous secondary particle aggregate structure. The model includes the effects of particle size, pore and particle microstructures, and solid–gas coupling including the quasi lattice vibrations for solid-like vibrating gas molecules in the gaps between adjacent secondary particles that are not included in previous models. The results show that the pressure-dependent effective gaseous thermal conductivities of RF and silica aerogels predicted by the present model agree well with experimental results. The solid–gas coupling significantly increases the effective gaseous thermal conductivity in the aerogels as the quasi lattice vibrating gas molecules in the gaps more effectively bridge adjacent particles. The effects of solid–gas coupling and pore and particle microstructures are significant for particle aggregate structures with mean pore and particle diameters in the range of 100 nm–10 μm while the Knudsen formula and the Zeng’s model have limited applicability in this size range. Micron and millimeter-scale pores that can occur in nanoporous silica aerogel samples due to the mechanical fragility of these nanostructures can be well represented by the present three pore size model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerogels and thermal insulation · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Glass properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Baetens R, Jelle BP, Thue JV, Tenpierik MJ, Grynning S, Uvslokk S, Gustavsen A (2010) Vacuum insulation panels for building applications: a review and beyond. Energy Build 42:147–17210.1016/j.enbuild.2009.09.005 ↗
2. Deng ZS, Wang J, Wu AM, Shen J, Zhou B (1998) High strength SiO2 aerogel insulation. J Non-Cryst Solids 225:101–10410.1016/S0022-3093(98)00106-9 ↗
3. Denpoh K (1998) Modeling of rarefied gas heat conduction between wafer and susceptor. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 11(1):25–2910.1109/66.661281 ↗
4. Fricke J, Tillotson T (1997) Aerogel: production, characterization, and application. Thin Solid Films 297:212–22310.1016/S0040-6090(96)09441-2 ↗
5. Heinemann U (2008) Influence of water on the total heat transfer in ‘evacuated’ insulations. Int J Thermophys 29:735–74910.1007/s10765-007-0361-1 ↗
6. Heinemann U, Caps R, Fricke J (1996) Radiation–conduction interaction: an investigation on silica aerogels. Int J Heat Mass Transf 39(10):2115–213010.1016/0017-9310(95)00313-4 ↗
7. Hemberger F, Weis S, Reichenauer G, Ebert HP (2009) Thermal transport properties of functionally graded carbon aerogels. Int J Thermophys 30:1357–137110.1007/s10765-009-0616-0 ↗
8. Kaganer MG (1969) Thermal insulation in cryogenic engineering. IPST Press, Jerusalem
9. Kennard EH (1938) Kinetic theory of gases. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 290–318
10. Kistler SS (1935) The relation between heat conductivity and structure in silica aerogel. J Phys Chem 39:79–8710.1021/j150361a006 ↗
11. Lee SC, Cunnington GR (2000) Conduction and radiation heat transfer in high-porosity fiber thermal insulation. J Thermophys Heat Transf 14(2):121–13610.2514/2.6508 ↗
12. Lee D, Stevens PC, Zeng SQ, Hunt AJ (1995) Thermal characterization of carbon-opacified silica aerogels. J Non-Cryst Solids 186:285–29010.1016/0022-3093(95)00055-0 ↗
13. Lee OJ, Lee KH, Yim TJ, Kim SY, Yoo KP (2002) Determination of mesopore size of aerogels from thermal conductivity measurements. J Non-Cryst Solids 298:287–29210.1016/S0022-3093(01)01041-9 ↗
14. Lu X, Arduini-Schuster MC, Kuhn J, Nilsson O, Fricke J, Pekala RW (1992) Thermal conductivity of monolithic organic aerogels. Science 255:971–97210.1126/science.255.5047.971 ↗
15. Lu X, Caps R, Fricke J, Alviso CT, Pekala RW (1995) Correlation between structure and thermal conductivity of organic aerogels. J Non-Cryst Solids 188:226–23410.1016/0022-3093(95)00191-3 ↗
16. Lu G, Wang XD, Duan YY, Li XW (2011) Effects of non-ideal structures and high temperatures on the insulation properties of aerogel-based composite materials. J Non-Cryst Solids 357:3822–382910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.07.022 ↗
17. Ozerinc S, Kakac S, Yazicioglu AG (2010) Enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a state-of-the-art review. Microfluid Nanofluid 8:145–17010.1007/s10404-009-0524-4 ↗
18. Raed K, Gross U (2009) Modeling of influence of gas atmosphere and pore-size distribution on the effective thermal conductivity of Knudsen and non-Knudsen porous materials. Int J Thermophys 30:1343–135610.1007/s10765-009-0600-8 ↗
19. Reichenauer G, Heinemann U, Ebert HP (2007) Relationship between pore size and the gas pressure dependence of the gaseous thermal conductivity. Colloids Surf A 300:204–21010.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.01.020 ↗
20. Spagnol S, Lartigue B, Trombe A, Despetis F (2009) Experimental investigations on the thermal conductivity of silica aerogels by a guarded thin-film-heater method. ASME J Heat Transf 131:07450110.1115/1.3089547 ↗
21. Swimm K, Reichenauer G, Vidi S, Ebert HP (2009) Gas pressure dependence of the heat transport in porous solids with pores smaller than 10 μm. Int J Thermophys 30:1329–134210.1007/s10765-009-0617-z ↗
22. Wang J, Kuhn J, Lu X (1995) Monolithic silica aerogel insulation doped with TiO2 powder and ceramic fibers. J Non-Cryst Solids 186:296–30010.1016/0022-3093(95)00068-2 ↗
23. Wang BX, Zhou LP, Peng XF (2003) A fractal model for predicting the effective thermal conductivity of liquid with suspension of nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:2665–267210.1016/S0017-9310(03)00016-4 ↗
24. Warrier P, Yuan YH, Beck MP, Teja AS (2010) Heat transfer in nanoparticle suspensions: modeling the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. AIChE J 56(12):3243–325610.1002/aic.12228 ↗
25. Wei GS, Liu YS, Zhang XX, Yu F, Du XZ (2011) Thermal conductivities study on silica aerogel and its composite insulation materials. Int J Heat Mass Transf 54:2355–236610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.02.026 ↗
26. Woignier T, Phalippou J, Prassas M (1990) Glasses from aerogels. J Mater Sci 25:3118–312610.1007/BF00587660 ↗
27. Zeng SQ, Hunt A, Greif R (1995a) Transport properties of gas in silica aerogel. J Non-Cryst Solids 186:264–27010.1016/0022-3093(95)00052-6 ↗
28. Zeng SQ, Hunt A, Greif R (1995b) Geometric structure and thermal conductivity of porous medium silica aerogel. ASME J Heat Transf 117(4):1055–105810.1115/1.2836281 ↗
29. Zhao SY, Zhang BM, He XD (2009) Temperature and pressure dependent effective thermal conductivity of fibrous insulation. Int J Therm Sci 48:440–44810.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.05.003 ↗
30. Zhao JJ, Duan YY, Wang XD, Wang BX (2011) Effect of nanofluids on thin film evaporation in microchannels. J Nanopart Res 13:5033–504710.1007/s11051-011-0484-y ↗
31. Zhao JJ, Duan YY, Wang XD, Wang BX (2012a) An analytical model for combined radiative and conductive heat transfer in fiber-loaded silica aerogels. J Non-Cryst Solids 358:1303–131210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.02.037 ↗
32. Zhao JJ, Duan YY, Wang XD, Wang BX (2012b) A 3-D numerical heat transfer model for silica aerogels based on the porous secondary nanoparticle aggregate structure. J Non-Cryst Solids 358:1287–129710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.02.035 ↗