Effect of sonication on particle dispersion, administered dose and metal release of non-functionalized, non-inert metal nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT: In this study, we elucidate the effect of different sonication techniques to efficiently prepare particle dispersions from selected non-functionalized NPs (Cu, Al, Mn, ZnO), and corresponding consequences on the particle dose, surface charge and release of metals. Probe sonication was shown to be the preferred method for dispersing non-inert, non-functionalized metal NPs (Cu, Mn, Al). However, rapid sedimentation during sonication resulted in differences between the real and the administered doses in the order of 30-80 % when sonicating in 1 and 2.56 g/L NP stock solutions. After sonication, extensive agglomeration of the metal NPs resulted in rapid sedimentation of all particles. DLVO calculations supported these findings, showing the strong van der Waals forces of the metal NPs to result in significant NP agglomeration. Metal release from the metal NPs was slightly increased by increased sonication. The addition of a stabilizing agent (bovine serum albumin) had an accelerating effect on the release of metals in sonicated solutions. For Cu and Mn NPs, the extent of particle dissolution increased from <1.6 to ~5 % after sonication for 15 min. A prolonged sonication time (3-15 min) had negligible effects on the zeta potential of the studied NPs. In all, it is shown that it is of utmost importance to carefully investigate how sonication influences the physico-chemical properties of dispersed metal NPs. This should be considered in nanotoxicology investigations of metal NPs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Coagulation and Flocculation Studies · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Alstrup Jensen K, Kembouche Y, Christiansen E, Jacobsen N, Wallin H, Guiot C, Spalla O, Witschger O (2011) Final protocol for producing suitable manufactured nanomaterial exposure media. NANOGENOTOX deliverable report 3
2. Alstrup Jensen K, Kembouche Y, Loeschner K, Correia M (2014) SOP for probe-sonicator calibration of delivered acoustic power and de-agglomeration efficiency for in vitro and in vivo toxicological testing, version 1.0. NANoREG
3. Barkalina N, Charalambous C, Jones C, Coward K (2014) Nanotechnology in reproductive medicine: emerging applications of nanomaterials. Nanomed Nanotech Biol Med 10:e921–e93810.1016/j.nano.2014.01.001 ↗
4. Bhattacharjee S (2016) DLS and zeta potential—what they are and what they are not? J Control Release. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.01710.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.017 ↗
5. Bihari P, Vippola M, Schultes S, Praetner M, Khandoga AG, Reichel CA, Coester C, Tuomi T, Rehberg M, Krombach F (2008) Optimized dispersion of nanoparticles for biological in vitro and in vivo studies. Part Fibre Toxicol 5:1–1410.1186/1743-8977-5-14 ↗
6. Bonner JC, Silva RM, Taylor AJ, Brown JM, Hilderbrand SC, Castranova V, Porter D, Elder A, Oberdorster G, Harkema JR (2013) Interlaboratory evaluation of rodent pulmonary responses to engineered nanomaterials: the NIEHS Nano GO Consortium. Environ Health Perspect 121:676–68210.1289/ehp.1205693 ↗
7. Chan DY, Pashley RM, White LR (1980) A simple algorithm for the calculation of the electrostatic repulsion between identical charged surfaces in electrolyte. J Colloid Interface Sci 77:283–28510.1016/0021-9797(80)90445-2 ↗
8. Cohen J, DeLoid G, Pyrgiotakis G, Demokritou P (2013) Interactions of engineered nanomaterials in physiological media and implications for in vitro dosimetry. Nanotoxicology 7:417–43110.3109/17435390.2012.666576 ↗
9. Cohen JM, Teeguarden JG, Demokritou P (2014) An integrated approach for the in vitro dosimetry of engineered nanomaterials. Part Fibre Toxicol 11:2010.1186/1743-8977-11-20 ↗
10. Cohen JM, DeLoid GM, Demokritou P (2015) A critical review of in vitro dosimetry for engineered nanomaterials. Nanomedicine 10:3015–303210.2217/nnm.15.129 ↗
11. Dickson D, Liu G, Li C, Tachiev G, Cai Y (2012) Dispersion and stability of bare hematite nanoparticles: effect of dispersion tools, nanoparticle concentration, humic acid and ionic strength. Sci Total Environ 419:170–17710.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.012 ↗
12. Franklin NM, Rogers NJ, Apte SC, Batley GE, Gadd GE, Casey PS (2007) Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate ZnO, bulk ZnO, and ZnCl2 to a freshwater microalga (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata): the importance of particle solubility. Environ Sci Technol 41:8484–849010.1021/es071445r ↗
13. Gliga AR, Skoglund S, Odnevall Wallinder I, Fadeel B, Karlsson HL (2014) Size-dependent cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human lung cells: the role of cellular uptake, agglomeration and Ag release. Part Fibre Toxicol 11:1110.1186/1743-8977-11-11 ↗
14. Grassian VH (2008) When size really matters: size-dependent properties and surface chemistry of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in gas and liquid phase environments. J Phys Chem C 112:18303–1831310.1021/jp806073t ↗
15. Guiot C, Spalla O (2012) Stabilization of TiO2 nanoparticles in complex medium through a pH adjustment protocol. Environ Sci Technol 47:1057–106410.1021/es3040736 ↗
16. Hartmann NB, Jensen KA, Baun A, Rasmussen K, Rauscher H, Tantra R, Cupi D, Gilliland D, Pianella F, Riego Sintes JM (2015) Techniques and protocols for dispersing nanoparticle powders in aqueous media—is there a rationale for harmonization? J Toxicol Environ Health Part B 18:1–2810.1080/10937404.2015.1074969 ↗
17. Hedberg YS, Odnevall Wallinder I (2016) Metal release from stainless steel in biological environments: a review. Biointerphases 11:01890110.1116/1.4934628 ↗
18. Hedberg J, Karlsson HL, Hedberg Y, Blomberg E, Odnevall Wallinder I (2016a) The importance of extracellular speciation and corrosion of copper nanoparticles on lung cell membrane integrity. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 141:291–30010.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.01.052 ↗
19. Hedberg YS, Pradhan S, Capellini F, Karlsson M-E, Blomberg E, Karlsson HL, Odnevall Wallinder I, Hedberg JF (2016b) Electrochemical surface oxide characteristics of metal nanoparticles (Mn, Cu and Al) and the relation to toxicity. Electrochim Acta 212:360–37110.1016/j.electacta.2016.07.017 ↗
20. Hussain SM, Warheit DB, Ng SP, Comfort KK, Grabinski CM, Braydich-Stolle LK (2015) At the crossroads of nanotoxicology in vitro: past achievements and current challenges. Toxicol Sci 147:5–1610.1093/toxsci/kfv106 ↗
21. Israelachvili JN (2011) Intermolecular and surface forces: revised, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Camebridge
22. Karlsson HL, Cronholm P, Hedberg Y, Tornberg M, De Battice L, Svedhem S, Odnevall Wallinder I (2013) Cell membrane damage and protein interaction induced by copper containing nanoparticles—importance of the metal release process. Toxicology 313:59–6910.1016/j.tox.2013.07.012 ↗
23. Lines M (2008) Nanomaterials for practical functional uses. J Alloys Compd 449:242–24510.1016/j.jallcom.2006.02.082 ↗
24. Mandzy N, Grulke E, Druffel T (2005) Breakage of TiO2 agglomerates in electrostatically stabilized aqueous dispersions. Powder Technol 160:121–12610.1016/j.powtec.2005.08.020 ↗
25. Midander K, Cronholm P, Karlsson HL, Elihn K, Möller L, Leygraf C, Wallinder IO (2009) Surface characteristics, copper release, and toxicity of nano-and micrometer-sized copper and copper (II) oxide particles: a cross-disciplinary study. Small 5:389–39910.1002/smll.200801220 ↗
26. Misra SK, Dybowska A, Berhanu D, Luoma SN, Valsami-Jones E (2012) The complexity of nanoparticle dissolution and its importance in nanotoxicological studies. Sci Total Environ 438:225–23210.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.066 ↗
27. Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EM, Somasundaran P, Klaessig F, Castranova V, Thompson M (2009) Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater 8:543–55710.1038/nmat2442 ↗
28. Nel AE, Parak WJ, Chan WC, Xia T, Hersam MC, Brinker CJ, Zink JI, Pinkerton KE, Baer DR, Weiss PS (2015) Where are we heading in nanotechnology environmental health and safety and materials characterization? ACS Nano 9:5627–563010.1021/acsnano.5b03496 ↗
29. Nickel C, Angelstorf J, Bienert R, Burkart C, Gabsch S, Giebner S, Haase A, Hellack B, Hollert H, Hund-Rinke K (2014) Dynamic light-scattering measurement comparability of nanomaterial suspensions. J Nanopart Res 16:1–1210.1007/s11051-014-2260-2 ↗
30. Ninham B, Parsegian V (1970) van der Waals forces across triple-layer films. J Phys Chem 52:4578–458710.1063/1.1673689 ↗
31. Oberdörster G, Stone V, Donaldson K (2007) Toxicology of nanoparticles: a historical perspective. Nanotoxicology 1:2–2510.1080/17435390701314761 ↗
32. OECD (2012) Guidance on sample preparation and dosimetry for the safety testing of manufactured nanomaterials. Series on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials, No. 3610.1787/ed430e1d-en ↗
33. Prescott WV, Schwartz AI (2008) Nanorods, nanotubes, and nanomaterials research progress. Nova Publishers, New York City
34. Puigdomenech I (2001) HYDRA MEDUSA: make equilibrium diagrams using sophisticated algorithms. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. http://www.kemi.kth.se/medusa/
35. Roebben G, Ramirez-Garcia S, Hackley V, Roesslein M, Klaessig F, Kestens V, Lynch I, Garner C, Rawle A, Elder A (2011) Interlaboratory comparison of size and surface charge measurements on nanoparticles prior to biological impact assessment. J Nanopart Res 13:2675–268710.1007/s11051-011-0423-y ↗
36. Russel WB, Saville DA, Schowalter WR (1989) Colloidal dispersions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511608810 ↗
37. Singh C, Friedrichs S, Levin M, Birkedal R, Jensen K, Pojana G, Wohlleben W, Schulte S, Wiench K, Turney T (2011) Zinc oxide NM-110, NM-111, NM-112, NM-113: characterisation and test item preparation. In: NM-series of representative manufactured nanomaterials. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Ispra, Italy
38. Tantra R, Sikora A, Hartmann NB, Sintes JR, Robinson KN (2015) Comparison of the effects of different protocols on the particle size distribution of TiO2 dispersions. Particuology 19:35–4410.1016/j.partic.2014.03.017 ↗
39. Taurozzi JS, Hackley VA, Wiesner MR (2011) Ultrasonic dispersion of nanoparticles for environmental, health and safety assessment—issues and recommendations. Nanotoxicology 5:711–72910.3109/17435390.2010.528846 ↗
40. Taurozzi JS, Hackley V, Wiesner M (2012) Preparation of nanoparticle dispersions from powdered material using ultrasonic disruption. NIST Special Publication 1200:210.6028/NIST.SP.1200-2 ↗
41. Taurozzi JS, Hackley VA, Wiesner MR (2013) A standardised approach for the dispersion of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in biological media. Nanotoxicology 7:389–40110.3109/17435390.2012.665506 ↗
42. Tokunaga TK (2012) DLVO-based estimates of adsorbed water film thicknesses in geologic CO2 reservoirs. Langmuir 28:8001–800910.1021/la2044587 ↗
43. Valsami-Jones E, Lynch I (2015) How safe are nanomaterials? Science 350:388–38910.1126/science.aad0768 ↗
44. Vogelgesang J, Hädrich J (1998) Limits of detection, identification and determination: a statistical approach for practitioners. Accredit Qual Assur 3:242–25510.1007/s007690050234 ↗
45. Wang J, Wang Y, Gao J, Hu P, Guan H, Zhang L, Xu R, Chen X, Zhang X (2009) Investigation on damage of BSA molecules under irradiation of low frequency ultrasound in the presence of Fe III-tartrate complexes. Ultrason Sonochem 16:41–4910.1016/j.ultsonch.2008.07.004 ↗
46. Xia T, Hamilton RF, Bonner JC, Crandall ED, Elder A, Fazlollahi F, Girtsman TA, Kim K, Mitra S, Ntim SA (2013) Interlaboratory evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity and inflammatory responses to engineered nanomaterials: the NIEHS Nano GO Consortium. Environ Health Perspect 121:683–69010.1289/ehp.1306561 ↗