Broader Societal Issues of Nanotechnology
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanoscale science and engineering are providing unprecedented understanding and control over the basic building blocks of matter, leading to increased coherence in knowledge, technology, and education. The main reason for developing nanotechnology is to advance broad societal goals such as improved comprehension of nature, increased productivity, better healthcare, and extending the limits of sustainable development and of human potential. This paper outlines societal implication activities in nanotechnology R&D programs. The US National Nanotechnology Initiative annual investment in research with educational and societal implications is estimated at about $30 million (of which National Science Foundation (NSF) awards about $23 million including contributions to student fellowships), and in nanoscale research with relevance to environment at about $50 million (of which NSF awards about $30 million and EPA about $6 million). An appeal is made to researchers and funding organizations worldwide to take timely and responsible advantage of the new technology for economic and sustainable development, to initiate societal implications studies from the beginning of the nanotechnology programs, and to communicate effectively the goals and potential risks with research users and the public.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanotechnology research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. APEC, 2002. Nanotechnology - The Technology for the 21st Century, Bangkok, Thailand.
2. Braach-Maksvytis V., 2002. Nanotechnology in Australia - towards a national initiative. J. Nanoparticle Res. 4(1-2), 1–7.10.1023/A:1020184311553 ↗
3. Bainbridge W.S., 2002. Public attitudes towards nanotechnology. J. Nanoparticle Res. 4(6), 561–570.10.1023/A:1022805516652 ↗
4. Bai C., 2001. Progress of nanoscience and nanotechnology in China. J. Nanoparticle Res. 3(4), 251–256.10.1023/A:1017988725647 ↗
5. EC, 2002. Sixth R&D Framework, Draft 6, November 2002, Brussels, Thematic Area 3 'Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials', Luxembourg.
6. EPA, 2002. Proc. nanotechnology and the environment: Applications and implications, Published Feb. 2003, Washington, DC, 83 pp., http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/ nano/GC ENV EPA2002 Proc 03-0204.pdf
7. Government of Japan, 2001. The Science and Technology Basic Plan (for 2001-2006), Tokyo, March 30.
8. Huang Z., H. Chen, A. Yip, G. Ng, F. Guo, Z.-K. Chen & M.C. Roco, 2003. Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: Country, institution and technology field. J. Nanoparticle Res. 5(3-4).
9. Lee C.K., M.K. Wu & J.C. Yang, 2002. A catalyst to change everything: MEMS/NEMS - a paradigm in Taiwan's nanotechnology. J. Nanoparticle Res. 4(5), 377–386.10.1023/A:1021669312396 ↗
10. Lee J.W., 2002. Overview of nanotechnology in Korea - 10 year blueprint. J. Nanoparticle Res. 4(6), 473–476.10.1023/A:1022803115700 ↗
11. Mnyusiwalla A., A.S. Daar & P.A. Singer, 2003. -Mind the gap': Science and ethics in nanotechnology. Nanotechnology, 14, R9–13.10.1088/0957-4484/14/3/201 ↗
12. NSF, 2002a. Proc. Nanogeoscience workshop, http://www. nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/nano/geo workshop.pdf
13. NSF, 2002b. Proc. Nanoscale Science and Engineering Grantees Conference, Arlington, Virginia, http://www-unix. oit.umass.edu/%7Enano/
14. Roco M.C., 2002. Nanoscale science and engineering educational activities in the US. J. Nanoparticle Res. 4(3), 271–274.10.1023/A:1019996207166 ↗
15. Roco M.C. & W. Bainbridge eds., 2001. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. National Science Foundation Report, (also Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 370 pp).10.1007/978-94-017-3012-9 ↗
16. Roco M.C. & R. Tomellini eds., 2002. Nanotechnology revolutionary opportunities and societal implications. European Commission Report, Luxembourg, 205 pp.
17. Roco M.C., R.S. Williams & P. Alivisatos eds., 1999. -Nanotechnology research directions'. US National Science and Technology Council, Washington, D.C., (also Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2000, 316 pp), http:// nano.gov
18. Roco M.C., 2003. National nanotechnology investment in the fiscal year 2004 budget request by the President. AAAS Report 28: R&D in FY 2004, Washington, DC, pp. 255–264, http://nano.gov
19. Roco M.C. & W.S. Bainbridge eds., 2002. -Converging technologies for improving human performance', National Science Foundation and Department of Commerce Report, (also Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2003; http://www.nsf.gov/nano).10.1007/978-94-017-0359-8_1 ↗
20. Yamaguchi Y. & K. Komiyama, 2001. Structuring knowledge project in nanotechnology: Materials program launched in Japan. J. Nanoparticle Res. 3(2-3), 105–110.10.1023/A:1017934502911 ↗