Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are now becoming a significant fraction of the material flows in the global economy. We are already reaping the benefits of improved energy efficiency, material use reduction, and better performance in many existing and new applications that have been enabled by these technological advances. As ENMs pervade the global economy, however, it becomes important to understand their environmental implications. As a first step, we combined ENM market information and material flow modeling to produce the first global assessment of the likely ENM emissions to the environment and landfills. The top ten most produced ENMs by mass were analyzed in a dozen major applications. Emissions during the manufacturing, use, and disposal stages were estimated, including intermediate steps through wastewater treatment plants and waste incineration plants. In 2010, silica, titania, alumina, and iron and zinc oxides dominate the ENM market in terms of mass flow through the global economy, used mostly in coatings/paints/pigments, electronics and optics, cosmetics, energy and environmental applications, and as catalysts. We estimate that 63–91 % of over 260,000–309,000 metric tons of global ENM production in 2010 ended up in landfills, with the balance released into soils (8–28 %), water bodies (0.4–7 %), and atmosphere (0.1–1.5 %). While there are considerable uncertainties in the estimates, the framework for estimating emissions can be easily improved as better data become available. The material flow estimates can be used to quantify emissions at the local level, as inputs for fate and transport models to estimate concentrations in different environmental compartments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (90)
Show source-provided references
1. Adeleye AS, Keller AA, Miller RJ, Lenihan HS (2013) Persistence of commercial nanoscaled zero-valent iron (nZVI) and by-products. J Nanopart Res10.1007/s11051-013-1418-7 ↗
2. Alda J, Rico-García JM, López-Alonso JM, Boreman G (2005) Optical antennas for nano-photonic applications. Nanotechnology 16:S23010.1088/0957-4484/16/5/017 ↗
3. Avasthi DK, Mishra YK, Kabiraj D, Lalla NP, Pivin CJ (2007) Synthesis of metal–polymer nanocomposite for optical applications. Nanotechnology 18:12560410.1088/0957-4484/18/12/125604 ↗
4. Baglioni P, Giorgi R (2006) Soft and hard nanomaterials for restoration and conservation of cultural heritage. Soft Matter 2:293–30310.1039/b516442g ↗
5. Baur J, Silverman E (2007) Challenges and opportunities in multifunctional nanocomposite structures for aerospace applications. MRS Bull 32:328–33410.1557/mrs2007.231 ↗
6. Benn TM, Westerhoff P (2008) Nanoparticle silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics. Environ Sci Technol 42:4133–413910.1021/es7032718 ↗
7. Bigall NC, Herrmann A-K, Vogel M, Rose M, Simon P, Carrillo-Cabrera W, Dorfs D, Kaskel S, Gaponik N, Eychmüller A (2009) Hydrogels and aerogels from noble metal nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48:9731–973410.1002/anie.200902543 ↗
8. Blasco C, Picó Y (2011) Determining nanomaterials in food. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 30:84–9910.1016/j.trac.2010.08.010 ↗
9. Blaser SA, Scheringer M, MacLeod M, Hungerbühler K (2008) Estimation of cumulative aquatic exposure and risk due to silver: contribution of nano-functionalized plastics and textiles. Sci Total Environ 390:396–40910.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.010 ↗
10. Boisseau P, Loubaton B (2011) Nanomedicine, nanotechnology in medicine. CR Phys 12:620–63610.1016/j.crhy.2011.06.001 ↗
11. Borchardt JK (2003) Nanotechnology providing new composites. Reinf Plast 47:36–39
12. Boxall A, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, Jones A, Aitken R, Jefferson B, Watts C (2007) Current and future predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. York, UK
13. Coelho MC, Torro G, Emami N, Gracio J (2012) Nanotechnology in automotive industry: research strategy and trends for the future-small objects, big impacts. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12:6621–663010.1166/jnn.2012.4573 ↗
14. Damoiseaux R, George S, Li M, Pokhrel S, Ji Z, France B, Xia T, Suarez E, Rallo R, Madler L, Cohen Y, Hoek EMV, Nel A (2011) No time to lose-high throughput screening to assess nanomaterial safety. Nanoscale 3:1345–136010.1039/c0nr00618a ↗
15. DEFRA (2002) Sewage treatment in the UK, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK
16. Dhakras PA (2011) Nanotechnology applications in water purification and waste water treatment: a review. In: 2011 International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET), pp 285–29110.1109/ICONSET.2011.6167965 ↗
17. Dhoke SK, Sinha TJM, Khanna AS (2009) Effect of nano-Al2O3 particles on the corrosion behavior of alkyd based waterborne coatings. J Coat Technol Res 6:353–36810.1007/s11998-008-9127-3 ↗
18. Ding B, Wang M, Wang X, Yu J, Sun G (2010) Electrospun nanomaterials for ultrasensitive sensors. Mater Today 13:16–2710.1016/S1369-7021(10)70200-5 ↗
19. Dionysiou D (2004) Environmental applications and implications of nanotechnology and nanomaterials. J Environ Eng 130:723–72410.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:7(723) ↗
20. Domina T, Koch K (1997) The textile waste lifecycle. Cloth Text Res J 15:96–10210.1177/0887302X9701500204 ↗
21. Du X, Graedel TE (2011) Uncovering the global life cycles of the rare earth elements. Sci Rep 1:14510.1038/srep00145 ↗
22. Duncan B, Elci SG, Rotello VM (2012) Beyond biomarkers: identifying cell state using unbiased nanosensor arrays. Nano Today 7:228–23010.1016/j.nantod.2012.06.001 ↗
23. Fairbairn EA, Keller AA, Mädler L, Zhou D, Pokhrel S, Cherr GN (2011) Metal oxide nanomaterials in seawater: linking physicochemical characteristics with biological response in sea urchin development. J Hazard Mater 192:1565–157110.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.080 ↗
24. Farokhzad OC, Langer R (2006) Nanomedicine: developing smarter therapeutic and diagnostic modalities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58:1456–145910.1016/j.addr.2006.09.011 ↗
25. Future_Markets (2012) The global market for nanomaterials 2002–2006: production volumes, revenues and end use markets. Future Markets Inc., http://www.futuremarketsinc.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=176&Itemid=73
26. Gao J, Youn S, Hovsepyan A, Llaneza VL, Wang Y, Bitton G, Bonzongo J-CJ (2009) Dispersion and toxicity of selected manufactured nanomaterials in natural river water samples: effects of water chemical composition. Environ Sci Technol 43:3322–332810.1021/es803315v ↗
27. Geranio L, Heuberger M, Nowack B (2009) The behavior of silver nanotextiles during washing. Environ Sci Technol 43:8113–811810.1021/es9018332 ↗
28. Gopalakrishnan K, Birgisson B, Taylor P, Attoh-Okine NO (2011) Nanotechnology in civil infrastructure: a paradigm shift. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-16657-0 ↗
29. Gottschalk F, Nowack B (2011) The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. J Environ Monit 13:1145–115510.1039/c0em00547a ↗
30. Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2009) Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9216–922210.1021/es9015553 ↗
31. Gottschalk F, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2010a) Probabilistic material flow modeling for assessing the environmental exposure to compounds: methodology and an application to engineered nano-TiO2 particles. Environ Model Softwar 25:320–33210.1016/j.envsoft.2009.08.011 ↗
32. Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2010b) Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:1036–104810.1002/etc.135 ↗
33. Gruère GP (2012) Implications of nanotechnology growth in food and agriculture in OECD countries. Food Policy 37:191–19810.1016/j.foodpol.2012.01.001 ↗
34. Hashimoto S, Moriguchi Y (2004) Proposal of six indicators of material cycles for describing society’s metabolism: from the viewpoint of material flow analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 40:185–20010.1016/S0921-3449(03)00070-3 ↗
35. Hassellöv M, Kaegi R (2009) Analysis and characterization of manufactured nanoparticles in aquatic environments. Environmental and Human Health Impacts of Nanotechnology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 211–26610.1002/9781444307504.ch6 ↗
36. Hendren CO, Mesnard X, Dröge J, Wiesner MR (2011) Estimating production data for five engineered nanomaterials as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45:2562–256910.1021/es103300g ↗
37. Henkler F, Tralau T, Tentschert J, Kneuer C, Haase A, Platzek T, Luch A, Götz M (2012) Risk assessment of nanomaterials in cosmetics: a European union perspective. Arch Toxicol 86:1641–164610.1007/s00204-012-0944-x ↗
38. Hsu L-Y, Chein H-M (2007) Evaluation of nanoparticle emissions for TiO2 nanopowder coating materials. J Nanopart Res 9:157–16310.1007/s11051-006-9185-3 ↗
39. Kaegi R, Ulrich A, Sinnet B, Vonbank R, Wichser A, Zuleeg S, Simmler H, Brunner S, Vonmont H, Burkhardt M, Boller M (2008) Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 156:233–23910.1016/j.envpol.2008.08.004 ↗
40. Kaiser J-P, Zuin S, Wick P (2013) Is nanotechnology revolutionizing the paint and lacquer industry? A critical opinion. Sci Total Environ 442:282–28910.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.009 ↗
41. Keller AA, Wang H, Zhou D, Lenihan HS, Cherr G, Cardinale BJ, Miller R, Ji Z (2010) Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ Sci Technol 44:1962–196710.1021/es902987d ↗
42. Khanna AS (2008) Nanotechnology in high performance paint coatings. Asian J Exp Sci 22:25–32
43. Khanna V, Bakshi BR (2009) Carbon nanofiber polymer composites: evaluation of life cycle energy use. Environ Sci Technol 43:2078–208410.1021/es802101x ↗
44. Kharisov BI, Kharissova OV (2010) Advances in nanotechnology in paper processing. Int J Green Nanotechnol Mater Sci Eng 2:M1–M810.1080/19430841.2010.488204 ↗
45. Khin MM, Nair AS, Babu VJ, Murugan R, Ramakrishna S (2012) A review on nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Energy Environ Sci 5:8075–810910.1039/c2ee21818f ↗
46. Khot LR, Sankaran S, Maja JM, Ehsani R, Schuster EW (2012) Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: a review. Crop Prot 35:64–7010.1016/j.cropro.2012.01.007 ↗
47. Kiser MA, Westerhoff P, Benn T, Wang Y, Pérez-Rivera J, Hristovski K (2009) Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 43:6757–676310.1021/es901102n ↗
48. Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, Mahendra S, McLaughlin MJ, Lead JR (2008) Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1825–185110.1897/08-090.1 ↗
49. Lanone S, Rogerieux F, Geys J, Dupont A, Maillot-Marechal E, Boczkowski J, Lacroix G, Hoet P (2009) Comparative toxicity of 24 manufactured nanoparticles in human alveolar epithelial and macrophage cell lines. Part Fibre Toxicol 6:1–1210.1186/1743-8977-6-14 ↗
50. Lee J, Mahendra S, Alvarez PJJ (2010) Nanomaterials in the construction industry: a review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations. ACS Nano 4:3580–359010.1021/nn100866w ↗
51. Liu HH, Cohen Y (2012) Multimedia environmental distribution of nanomaterials. In: Nanotechnology 2012: bio sensors, instruments, medical, environment and energy, Nanotech 2012 vol 3. pp 304–306
52. Lopez-Moreno ML, de la Rosa G, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Castillo-Michel H, Botez CE, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2010) Evidence of the differential biotransformation and genotoxicity of ZnO and CeO2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ Sci Technol 44(19):7315–732010.1021/es903891g ↗
53. Lowry GV, Espinasse BP, Badireddy AR, Richardson CJ, Reinsch BC, Bryant LD, Bone AJ, Deonarine A, Chae S, Therezien M, Colman BP, Hsu-Kim H, Bernhardt ES, Matson CW, Wiesner MR (2012a) Long-term transformation and fate of manufactured Ag nanoparticles in a simulated large scale freshwater emergent wetland. Environ Sci Technol 46:7027–703610.1021/es204608d ↗
54. Lowry GV, Gregory KB, Apte SC, Lead JR (2012b) Transformations of nanomaterials in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 46:6891–689210.1021/es3022039 ↗
55. Marín S, Merkoçi A (2012) Nanomaterials based electrochemical sensing applications for safety and security. Electroanalysis 24:459–46910.1002/elan.201100576 ↗
56. Mu L, Sprando R (2010) Application of nanotechnology in cosmetics. Pharm Res 27:1746–174910.1007/s11095-010-0139-1 ↗
57. Mueller NC, Nowack B (2008) Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447–445310.1021/es7029637 ↗
58. Musee N (2011) Simulated environmental risk estimation of engineered nanomaterials: a case of cosmetics in Johannesburg City. Hum Exp Toxicol 30:1181–119510.1177/0960327110391387 ↗
59. Navarro E, Baun A, Behra R, Hartmann NB, Filser J, Miao AJ, Quigg A, Santschi PH, Sigg L (2008) Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi. Ecotoxicology 17:372–38610.1007/s10646-008-0214-0 ↗
60. O’Brien N, Cummins E (2010) Ranking initial environmental and human health risk resulting from environmentally relevant nanomaterials. J Environ Sci Health A 45:992–100710.1080/10934521003772410 ↗
61. Peckenham JM (2005) The use of biosolids in Maine: a review, prepared for Maine State Planning Office and the Maine Waste Water Control Association
62. Peralta-Videa JR, Zhao L, Lopez-Moreno ML, de la Rosa G, Hong J, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2011) Nanomaterials and the environment: a review for the biennium 2008–2010. J Hazard Mater 186:1–1510.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.020 ↗
63. Petrov PD, Georgiev GL (2012) Fabrication of super-macroporous nanocomposites by deposition of carbon nanotubes onto polymer cryogels. Eur Polym J 48:1366–137310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.05.002 ↗
64. Presting H, König U (2003) Future nanotechnology developments for automotive applications. Mater Sci Eng C 23:737–74110.1016/j.msec.2003.09.120 ↗
65. Qian L, Hinestroza J (2004) Application of nanotechnology for high performance textiles. J Text Appar Technol Manag 4:1–7
66. Reck BK, Graedel TE (2012) Challenges in metal recycling. Science 337:690–69510.1126/science.1217501 ↗
67. Sabitha M, Jose S, Raj S, Sumod U (2012) Nanotechnology in cosmetics: opportunities and challenges. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 4:186–19310.4103/0975-7406.99016 ↗
68. Sahoo NG, Rana S, Cho JW, Li L, Chan SH (2010) Polymer nanocomposites based on functionalized carbon nanotubes. Prog Polym Sci 35:837–86710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.03.002 ↗
69. Salonitis K, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2010) Nanotechnology for the needs of the automotive industry. Int J Nanomanuf 6:99–11010.1504/IJNM.2010.034776 ↗
70. Savage N, Diallo MS (2005) Nanomaterials and water purification: opportunities and challenges. J Nanopart Res 7:331–34210.1007/s11051-005-7523-5 ↗
71. Schmidt M (2008) The Sankey diagram in energy and material flow management. J Ind Ecol 12:82–9410.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00004.x ↗
72. Serrano E, Rus G, García-Martínez J (2009) Nanotechnology for sustainable energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:2373–238410.1016/j.rser.2009.06.003 ↗
73. Shafer MM, Overdier JT, Armstong DE (1998) Removal, partitioning, and fate of silver and other metals in wastewater treatment plants and effluent-receiving streams. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:630–64110.1002/etc.5620170416 ↗
74. Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Mercer R, Murray AR, Johnson VJ, Potapovich AI, Tyurina YY, Gorelik O, Arepalli S, Schwegler-Berry D, Hubbs AF, Antonini J, Evans DE, Ku B-K, Ramsey D, Maynard A, Kagan VE, Castranova V, Baron P (2005) Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 289:L698–L70810.1152/ajplung.00084.2005 ↗
75. Silvestre C, Duraccio D, Cimmino S (2011) Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 36:1766–178210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.003 ↗
76. Singh P, Nanda A (2012) Nanotechnology in cosmetics: a boon or bane? Toxicol Environ Chem 94:1467–147910.1080/02772248.2012.723482 ↗
77. Song L, Toth G, Vajtai R, Endo M, Ajayan PM (2012) Fabrication and characterization of single-walled carbon nanotube fiber for electronics applications. Carbon 50:5521–552410.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.041 ↗
78. Su S, Wu W, Gao J, Lu J, Fan C (2012) Nanomaterials-based sensors for applications in environmental monitoring. J Mater Chem 22:18101–1811010.1039/c2jm33284a ↗
79. Subramanian V, Takhee L (2012) Nanotechnology-based flexible electronics. Nanotechnology 23:34020110.1088/0957-4484/23/34/340201 ↗
80. Suh S, Yee S (2011) Phosphorus use-efficiency of agriculture and food system in the US. Chemosphere 84:806–81310.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.051 ↗
81. Tan E, Yin P, Lang X, Wang X, You T, Guo L (2012) Functionalized gold nanoparticles as nanosensor for sensitive and selective detection of silver ions and silver nanoparticles by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Analyst 137:3925–392810.1039/c2an35670h ↗
82. Thomas CR, George S, Horst AM, Ji Z, Miller RJ, Peralta-Videa JR, Xia T, Pokhrel S, Mädler L, Gardea-Torresdey JL, Holden PA, Keller AA, Lenihan HS, Nel AE, Zink JI (2011) Nanomaterials in the environment: from materials to high-throughput screening to organisms. ACS Nano 5:13–2010.1021/nn1034857 ↗
83. United_Nations (2011) Municipal waste treatment. United Nations Statistics Division
84. Weiss J, Takhistov P, McClements DJ (2006) Functional materials in food nanotechnology. J Food Sci 71:R107–R11610.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00195.x ↗
85. Windler L, Lorenz C, von Goetz N, Hungerbühler K, Amberg M, Heuberger M, Nowack B (2012) Release of titanium dioxide from textiles during washing. Environ Sci Technol 46:8181–818810.1021/es301633b ↗
86. Wong YWH, Yuen CWM, Leung MYS, Ku SKA, Lam HLI (2006) Selected applications of nanotechnology in textiles. AUTEX Res J 6:1–810.1515/aut-2006-060101 ↗
87. Xia T, Kovochich M, Liong M, Mädler L, Gilbert B, Shi H, Yeh JI, Zink JI, Nel AE (2008) Comparison of the mechanism of toxicity of zinc oxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles based on dissolution and oxidative stress properties. ACS Nano 2:2121–213410.1021/nn800511k ↗
88. Zhao L, Peralta-Videa JR, Varela-Ramirez A, Castillo-Michel H, Li C, Zhang J, Aguilera RJ, Keller AA, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2012) Effect of surface coating and organic matter on the uptake of CeO2 NPs by corn plants grown in soil: insight into the uptake mechanism. J. Hazard Mater. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.00810.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.008 ↗
89. Zhou D, Keller AA (2010) Role of morphology in the aggregation kinetics of ZnO nanoparticles. Water Res 44:2948–295610.1016/j.watres.2010.02.025 ↗
90. Zhou Z-Y, Tian N, Li J-T, Broadwell I, Sun S-G (2011) Nanomaterials of high surface energy with exceptional properties in catalysis and energy storage. Chem Soc Rev 40:4167–418510.1039/c0cs00176g ↗