The Effect of MRET Polymer Compound on SAR Values of RF Phones
Source abstract
Abstract
This article is related to the proposed hypothesis and experimental data regarding the ability of defined polar polymer compound (MRET polymer) applied to RF phones to increase the dielectric permittivity of water based solutions and to reduce the SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) values inside the "phantom head" filled with the jelly simulating muscle and brain tissues. Due to the high organizational state of fractal structures of MRET polymer compounds and the phenomenon of piezoelectricity, this polymer generates specific subtle, low frequency, non-coherent electromagnetic oscillations (optimal random field) that can affect the hydrogen lattice of the molecular structure of water and subsequently modify the electrodynamic properties of water. The increase of dielectric permittivity of water finally leads to the reduction of the absorption rate of the electromagnetic field by living tissue. The reduction of SAR values is confirmed by the research conducted in June - July of 2006 at RF Exposure Laboratory in Escondido, California. This test also confirmed that the application of MRET polymer to RF phones does not significantly affect the air measurements of RF phone signals, and subsequently does not lead to any significant distortion of transmitted RF signals.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects · Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects · Chemical and Physical Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (5)
Show source-provided references
1. ANSI/EEE C95.1 (1999). “American National Standard Safety Levels with respect to Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 300 kHz to 100 GHz.” New York:IEEE, 1992.
2. ANSI/EEE C95.3 (2002). IEEE Recommended Practice for the Measurement of Potentially Hazardous Electromagnetic Fields-RF and Microwave, New York: IEEE.
3. Federal Communications Commission, OET Bulletin 65 (Edition 97–01), Supplement c (Edition 01–01), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Field, July 2001.
4. Moulton, J.M. (2006). “R&D Testing SAR Evaluation, Test Report No: R&D 20060601.” RF Exposure Lab, Escondido, California, June-July 2006.
5. Serov, I.N. (2003). “Aires Ecological Converter.”Aires New Medical Technologies Foundation, St. Petersburg, Russia.