journal article·2025-07-03

Microwave- and ultrasound-assisted extraction of biocompounds from poblano chilli waste

Miguel Eduardo Cardoso-Ugarte, Raúl Alberto Morales-Luckie, Nill Campos-González, María Elena Sosa-Morales, Gabriel Abraham Cardoso-Ugarte

Publisher page

Abstract

Green extraction techniques like microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) offer benefits due to their reduced environmental impact, lower consumption of organic solvents, energy, time and enhanced efficiency. This research aimed to extract phenolic compounds from unroasted poblano chilli (UPC) and roasted poblano chilli (RPC) Capsicum annum cv. ‘Poblano’ waste using UAE and MAE. Operational parameters were optimized by response surface methodology (RSM) to maximize the extraction of phenolics and evaluate the antioxidant capacity of the extracts. The highest yields were obtained using UAE in RPC (1.76 ± 0.14 mg GAE/gDW), followed by MAE in RPC (1.48 ± 0.05 mg GAE/gDW). HPLC analysis confirmed the higher concentration of gallic acid in the UAE-RPC extracts. No significant differences (p < 0.05) in extraction yield were found between the techniques for UPC. RPC extracts showed higher antioxidant capacity (80.56 ± 2.26 and 43.91 ± 3.78 μmol TE/gDW) compared to unroasted ones (13.72 ± 0.95 and 15.04 ± 1.44 μmol TE/gDW), regardless of the extraction method. RSM analysis indicated that UAE was the most effective treatment (60 °C, 5 min and 2% of sample concentration). A bibliometric analysis revealed opportunities for further research and utilization of poblano chili waste as a functional ingredient. Both extraction techniques were effective, highlighting poblano chili waste as a source of antioxidant phenolic compounds.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Facultad de Química, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEMex), Paseo Colón S/N, Residencial Colón y Col. Ciprés, Toluca Estado de México

Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Alimentos y Ambiental, Universidad de las Américas Puebla. Sta. Catarina Mártir

Departamento de Ciencia de los Materiales, Centro Conjunto de Investigación en Química Sustentable (CCIQS), Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEMex), Carr. Toluca-Atlacomulco, Toluca Estado de México

Posgrado en Biociencias, División de Ciencias de la Vida, Campus Irapuato-Salamanca, Universidad de Guanajuato, Irapuato, México

Facultad de Gastronomía, Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla

Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Puebla (CONCYTEP), Puebla

Funding

CONAHCYT

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12649-021-01431-z10.1007/s12649-021-01431-z ↗
2. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.05.05310.1016/j.indcrop.2019.05.053 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.03.01110.1016/j.crfs.2021.03.011 ↗
4. 10.1080/16583655.2019.158246010.1080/16583655.2019.1582460 ↗
5. 10.3390/molecules2515352810.3390/molecules25153528 ↗
6. 10.3390/molecules2810423910.3390/molecules28104239 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.11929010.1016/j.seppur.2021.119290 ↗
8. 10.1080/10408347.2019.168696610.1080/10408347.2019.1686966 ↗
9. 10.2139/ssrn.346264110.2139/ssrn.3462641 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.10529310.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105293 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-510.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.08710.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.087 ↗
13. Cerón-Carrillo T Munguía-Pérez R García S Santiesteban-López NA. 2014. Actividad antimicrobiana de extractos de diferentes especies de chile (capsicum). Rev Iberoameric Ciencias 1.
14. 10.1007/s12161-024-02645-210.1007/s12161-024-02645-2 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.10.01810.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.10.018 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.00710.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.007 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.crfs.2019.11.00110.1016/j.crfs.2019.11.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.12.00210.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.12.002 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170-019-03809-910.1007/s00170-019-03809-9 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.05.01410.1016/j.tifs.2017.05.014 ↗
21. 10.1007/s12393-011-9036-610.1007/s12393-011-9036-6 ↗
22. Forsythe WE. 1954. Smithsonian physical tables (9th revised edition). [accessed 2023 Mar 22]. https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpSPTRE008/smithsonian-physical/smithsonian-physical.
23. 10.3390/ijms2121835710.3390/ijms21218357 ↗
24. 10.3390/app1014477410.3390/app10144774 ↗
25. 10.1007/s12161-022-02437-610.1007/s12161-022-02437-6 ↗
26. 10.3390/cryst1009080010.3390/cryst10090800 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.00510.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.005 ↗
28. 10.3390/foods1002021310.3390/foods10020213 ↗
29. Keharom S, Mahachai R, Techawongstein S, Chanthai S. 2016. Optimization studies on ultrasonic assisted extraction of the capsaicinoids from sweet-to-superhot chilli samples using response surface methodology. Int Food Res J. 23(4): 1676–1684.
30. 10.3746/pnf.2020.25.3.30110.3746/pnf.2020.25.3.301 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11947-010-0440-310.1007/s11947-010-0440-3 ↗
32. 10.3389/fphys.2018.0047710.3389/fphys.2018.00477 ↗
33. 10.15376/biores.18.3.Lopez-Salazar10.15376/biores.18.3.Lopez-Salazar ↗
34. 10.1080/08327823.2019.167742910.1080/08327823.2019.1677429 ↗
35. Mandal V, Mohan Y, Hemalatha S. 2007. Microwave assisted extraction-an innovative and promising extraction tool for medicinal plant research. Pharmacogn Rev. 1(1):7–18.
36. 10.1007/s13197-015-1988-810.1007/s13197-015-1988-8 ↗
37. 10.1080/01496395.2020.180493810.1080/01496395.2020.1804938 ↗
38. 10.1080/10942912.2020.185886610.1080/10942912.2020.1858866 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.10576110.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105761 ↗
40. 10.3390/molecules2516365210.3390/molecules25163652 ↗
41. 10.1111/1541-4337.1250710.1111/1541-4337.12507 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3092110.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30921 ↗
43. 10.1080/10408398.2011.65414210.1080/10408398.2011.654142 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.09.03910.1016/j.plaphy.2019.09.039 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.05410.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.054 ↗
46. 10.1007/s13197-020-04433-210.1007/s13197-020-04433-2 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.02.01410.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.02.014 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.11289110.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112891 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.03.00110.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.03.001 ↗
50. 10.2174/187639600090201002010.2174/1876396000902010020 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.07.02710.1016/j.trac.2019.07.027 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.11162910.1016/j.lwt.2021.111629 ↗
53. 10.32604/phyton.2024.05164410.32604/phyton.2024.051644 ↗
54. Rodríguez J, Peña Olvera BV, Gil Muñoz A, Corona BM, Manzo F, Liendo LS. 2007. Recovery of “poblano” pepper in Puebla, México. Rev Fitotec Mex. 30(1):25–32.
55. 10.1016/s0021-9673(03)01184-110.1016/s0021-9673(03)01184-1 ↗
56. 10.1080/08327823.2017.132026510.1080/08327823.2017.1320265 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.04.01110.1016/j.dyepig.2013.04.011 ↗
58. SEMARNAT. 2020. Diagnóstico básico para la gestión integral de los residuos. [accessed 2023 Jan 8]. https://www.gob.mx/inecc/acciones-y-programas/diagnostico-basico-para-la-gestion-integral-de-los-residuos-2020.
59. 10.3389/fcimb.2024.145128710.3389/fcimb.2024.1451287 ↗
60. 10.4067/S0718-0764201900050005710.4067/S0718-07642019000500057 ↗
61. 10.1080/10826068.2018.143178410.1080/10826068.2018.1431784 ↗
62. 10.1080/01496395.2011.64461610.1080/01496395.2011.644616 ↗
63. 10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.14410.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.foodres.2004.09.00110.1016/j.foodres.2004.09.001 ↗
65. 10.1021/jf204233u10.1021/jf204233u ↗
66. Trujillo-Contreras MI. 2011. Cuantificación de compuestos antioxidantes capsaicina y capacidad antioxidante en chile serrano (Capsicum Annum) bajo distinto manejo agronómico y sistema de cultivo [dissertation]. Querétaro: Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro.
67. 10.1111/jfpe.1319710.1111/jfpe.13197 ↗
68. 10.1007/s12649-021-01411-310.1007/s12649-021-01411-3 ↗
69. 10.1016/B978-0-12-816911-7.00012-810.1016/B978-0-12-816911-7.00012-8 ↗
70. 10.1002/fsn3.284910.1002/fsn3.2849 ↗
71. 10.1002/jssc.20090048710.1002/jssc.200900487 ↗
72. 10.1111/ijfs.1488110.1111/ijfs.14881 ↗