journal article·2021-01-02

Comparison of heating performance between inverter and cycled microwave heating of foods using a coupled multiphysics-kinetic model

Ran Yang, Qianyi Chen, Jiajia Chen

Publisher page

Abstract

Non-uniform heating has been a challenging problem in microwave heating due to ‘standing wave pattern’ and ‘thermal runaway’ problems. Cycled microwave heating was used to improve microwave heating uniformity of frozen products, while a relatively new approach of inverter heating was claimed to help preserve food quality during thawing/heating. In this study, finite-element-method-based coupled multiphysics-kinetic models were developed, validated, and used to investigate these controversial results by comparing the heating performances of average temperature, heating non-uniformity, and nutritional value change between the inverter and cycled microwave heating of foods. The effect of food sizes/shapes and material properties (dielectric loss) was evaluated. Results showed that there was little difference in average temperature, heating uniformity, and Vitamin C content between cycled and inverter heating for different food products. A relatively more uniform heating and lower nutritional value degradation were observed for small size low loss material; however, the improvement was not significant enough to claim the benefit of inverter heating.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Food Drying and Modeling · Induction Heating and Inverter Technology · Microbial Inactivation Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Food Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Agarry SE · Glob J Eng Res · 2009 · 10 · 1
2. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.07.01510.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.07.015 ↗
3. 10.1080/08327823.1999.1168838510.1080/08327823.1999.11688385 ↗
4. 10.1080/08327823.1999.1168838410.1080/08327823.1999.11688384 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.03310.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.033 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.02.00710.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.02.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.05.02910.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.05.029 ↗
8. Chen J · Trans ASABE · 2013 · 56 · 1457
9. 10.1016/j.fbp.2016.04.00910.1016/j.fbp.2016.04.009 ↗
10. 10.1111/1750-3841.1263610.1111/1750-3841.12636 ↗
11. COMSOL Inc. 2017. RF module user guide v5.3a.
12. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.02.05010.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.02.050 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.01.01710.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.01.017 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.09.01410.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.09.014 ↗
15. Lewis M · 2000
16. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01573.x10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01573.x ↗
17. 10.1016/S0017-9310(98)00123-910.1016/S0017-9310(98)00123-9 ↗
18. 10.1080/1094291990952460910.1080/10942919909524609 ↗
19. Panasonic. 2020. What's an inverter? [Accessed: 2020 Sep 25]. https://www.panasonic.com/caribbean/consumer/home-appliances/cooking-learn/technology/what_s-an-inverter-html.
20. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.12.01510.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.12.015 ↗
21. 10.1109/TMTT.2005.84706610.1109/TMTT.2005.847066 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11947-008-0136-010.1007/s11947-008-0136-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.01.00710.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.01.007 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.07.01310.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.07.013 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0307-904X(02)00058-610.1016/S0307-904X(02)00058-6 ↗
26. Yang HW · Food Eng Phys Prop · 2001 · 66 · 998
27. 10.1016/j.ifset.2017.02.00910.1016/j.ifset.2017.02.009 ↗