Time-domain thin layer method for computing transient response due to sudden/moving loads
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the author applied the thin-layer method (TLM) for developing explicit time domain solutions for the ground response due to impulse and moving loads.The Fourier and Laplace transforms for space and time, respectively, are applied to derive the transformed domain solution that satisfies given boundary conditions.The eigenvalue decomposition in the Laplace parameter domain and the discrete wave number superposition for the horizontal wave field description lead to an accurate and efficient strategy for a stable time-space domain solution.Some demonstrations are given: The first example is a fundamental problem relating to interpretation of the causal transient responses of the P, S, and Rayleigh waves due to an impact loading.The second example is also fundamental, and treats the description of a compound wave field produced by a single moving load, detailing the kinematic as well as the inertial effects, with the speed being an important parameter.The third example is an engineering application that demonstrates the track response due to train passage in order to interpret the wave generation in ground by the high-speed passage.A comparison to measurement data is presented for validation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Civil and Geotechnical Engineering Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Dieterman · Eur. J. Mech. A Solids · 1997 · 6 · 295
2. 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90038-810.1016/0020-7225(65)90038-8 ↗
3. Eason · J. Inst. Math. Appl. · 1966 · 2 · 29910.1093/imamat/2.4.299 ↗
4. Gakenheimer · J. Appl. Mech. (ASME) · 1969 · 36 · 50510.1115/1.3564708 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1987.tb06648.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.1987.tb06648.x ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1981.tb05947.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.1981.tb05947.x ↗
7. 10.1002/nme.162037060410.1002/nme.1620370604 ↗
8. Kausel · J. Eng. Mech. (ASCE) · 1975 · 101 · 679
9. 10.1098/rsta.1904.001310.1098/rsta.1904.0013 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00419010017410.1007/s004190100174 ↗
11. Lysmer · Methods Comput. Phys. · 1972 · 11 · 181
12. Mitra · Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. · 1964 · 60 · 68310.1017/S0305004100077409 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb01942.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb01942.x ↗
14. Payton · Quart. Appl. Math. · 1964 · 21 · 29910.1090/qam/155477 ↗
15. Pekeris · Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1955 · 41 · 62910.1073/pnas.41.9.629 ↗
16. 10.1006/jsvi.1999.223210.1006/jsvi.1999.2232 ↗
17. Takemiya · 2001 · 347
18. 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01007-610.1016/S0022-460X(02)01007-6 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:7(699)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:7(699) ↗
20. 10.1016/0267-7261(94)90041-810.1016/0267-7261(94)90041-8 ↗
21. Takemiya · J. Struct. Mech. Earthq. Eng. (JSCE) · 2000 · 640 · 89
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1993)119:12(2385)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1993)119:12(2385) ↗
23. Takemiya · 1993 · 307
24. 10.1002/eqe.429023090210.1002/eqe.4290230902 ↗
25. Takemiya · J. Struct. Mech. Earthq. Eng. (JSCE) · 2001 · 882 · 299
26. 10.1002/eqe.429024070210.1002/eqe.4290240702 ↗