journal article·2008-09-01Open access

Determination of mode I stress intensity factors of complex configurations using strain gages

Sanda Swamy, Manda Srikanth, Kondepudi Murthy, Puthuveettin Robi

Abstract

Among techniques for the determination of the mode I stress intensity factors (SIFs), strain gage procedures are the simplest and most straightforward.We report here on an experimental investigation of the determination of opening mode stress intensity factors using the single strain gage method.Our approach overcomes certain drawbacks and greatly widens the applicability of strain gage methods in the determination of static SIFs of complex configurations.The approach was tested through experiments on specimens of finite width and finite height edge-cracked plates (fully finite plates) subjected to tensile stress.We compared the experimentally determined mode I stress intensity factors of fully finite plates with the computed values using finite element analysis, obtaining good agreement between the present approach and computed values.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 2005
2. 10.1007/BF0232647110.1007/BF02326471 ↗
3. 10.1002/nme.162010010310.1002/nme.1620100103 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0231756410.1007/BF02317564 ↗
5. 10.1016/0013-7944(78)90022-X10.1016/0013-7944(78)90022-X ↗
6. Chan · 1979
7. Dally · 1986
8. Dally · 1993 · 1
9. 10.1007/BF0233031110.1007/BF02330311 ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0003792410.1007/BF00037924 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0232500210.1007/BF02325002 ↗
13. 10.1016/0020-7403(90)90022-B10.1016/0020-7403(90)90022-B ↗
14. Irwin · J. Appl. Mech. (ASME) · 1957 · 24 · 36110.1115/1.4011547 ↗
15. 10.1016/0013-7944(88)90073-210.1016/0013-7944(88)90073-2 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0068155710.1007/BF00681557 ↗
17. 10.1088/0022-3727/21/1/01210.1088/0022-3727/21/1/012 ↗
18. 10.1016/0013-7944(89)90312-310.1016/0013-7944(89)90312-3 ↗
19. 10.1016/0013-7944(96)00029-X10.1016/0013-7944(96)00029-X ↗
20. 10.1016/0013-7944(94)00298-V10.1016/0013-7944(94)00298-V ↗
21. 10.1016/0013-7944(93)90118-C10.1016/0013-7944(93)90118-C ↗
22. 10.1016/0013-7944(89)90243-910.1016/0013-7944(89)90243-9 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0232909510.1007/BF02329095 ↗
24. 10.1016/0013-7944(72)90007-010.1016/0013-7944(72)90007-0 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00810.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00810.x ↗
26. 10.1016/0013-7944(93)90203-510.1016/0013-7944(93)90203-5 ↗
27. 10.1016/0013-7944(95)00214-610.1016/0013-7944(95)00214-6 ↗
28. 10.1016/0093-6413(79)90033-810.1016/0093-6413(79)90033-8 ↗
29. Sanford · 2003
30. Theocaris · J. Appl. Mech. (ASME) · 1970 · 37 · 40910.1115/1.3408521 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0167-8442(97)00038-410.1016/S0167-8442(97)00038-4 ↗
32. Williams · J. Appl. Mech. (ASME) · 1957 · 24 · 10910.1115/1.4011454 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0019110610.1007/BF00191106 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2003.12.00410.1016/j.polymertesting.2003.12.004 ↗