Response of submerged metallic sandwich structures to underwater impulsive loads
Source abstract
Abstract
The response of planar sandwich structures with metallic square-honeycomb cores under high-intensity water-based impulsive loading is analyzed through fully dynamic finite element simulations.The analyses concern overall structural response, damage and energy dissipation.The steel sandwich plates considered have different contact conditions with water -an air-backed configuration which simulates contact with water on only the load side and a water-backed configuration which simulates submerged conditions.The 3D finite element simulations account for the effects of fluid-structure interactions and the ductile failure of the sandwich structure material.Results show that the primary deformation mode is core-wall buckling in light-core structures and shear-rupture in face-sheets and core-webs in heavy-core structures.On a unit weight basis, sandwich structures with heavy cores perform poorly while those with light cores exhibit superior blast-resistance in terms of back-face deflection and total energy absorbed.Significant differences between the responses of air-backed and water-backed structures are observed.An analysis is carried out to develop structure-loading-performance relations to facilitate the design of structures tailored for specific loading conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11340-011-9543-710.1007/s11340-011-9543-7 ↗
2. Cole · Phys. Rev. · 1947 · 72 · 177
3. 10.1115/1.308643610.1115/1.3086436 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.06.00610.1016/j.jmps.2005.06.006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.06.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.06.008 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2009.05.00310.1016/j.euromechsol.2009.05.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.002 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11340-006-0296-710.1007/s11340-006-0296-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.10.01210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.10.012 ↗
10. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.00510.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.01410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.014 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.217883710.1115/1.2178837 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.219854910.1115/1.2198549 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.03.01710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.03.017 ↗
16. 10.2140/jomms.2007.2.198110.2140/jomms.2007.2.1981 ↗
17. 10.2140/jomms.2007.2.204910.2140/jomms.2007.2.2049 ↗
18. 10.1115/1.242471710.1115/1.2424717 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.07910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.079 ↗
20. 10.3139/146.10158410.3139/146.101584 ↗
21. 10.2140/jomms.2007.2.174310.2140/jomms.2007.2.1743 ↗
22. 10.2140/jomms.2007.2.194710.2140/jomms.2007.2.1947 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.07.00710.1016/j.jmps.2012.07.007 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.10.01010.1016/j.jmps.2007.10.010 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00315-210.1016/S0020-7683(00)00315-2 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.007 ↗
27. 10.1002/nme.114210.1002/nme.1142 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00375-510.1016/S0020-7683(03)00375-5 ↗
29. 10.1080/1478643050007394510.1080/14786430500073945 ↗