journal article·2008-07-01Open access

A thermomechanical framework of plasticity based on probabilistic micromechanics

Itai Einav, Ian Collins

Abstract

A conventional thermomechanical elasto-plastic constitutive modelling framework is proposed but which allows an effective physical interpretation of the micromechanical internal variables and inherent parameters in a representative volume element (RVE).The statistical distribution of the elastic-plastic parameters within the RVE is described using a simple statistical method of probabilistic rearrangement (MPR).This method facilitates deriving analytical approximating formulas to the stress-strain response of the RVE under unidirectional monotonic loading conditions.The applicability of the MPR is validated numerically by comparing the analytical formulas against numerical experiments of a probabilistic boundary value problem initially under monotonic conditions.The assumptions associated with the MPR are embedded within the simple micro thermomechanical constitutive framework and further evaluated numerically by applying the methodology for the case of cyclic loads.For the limited experimental program the constitutive modelling framework seems to give a rather effective estimation of the full boundary value problem.The results for the cyclic case demonstrate how hysteresis behaviour of materials could be modelled without incorporating kinematic hardening parameters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1155/TSM.11.5710.1155/TSM.11.57 ↗
2. Chaboche · Tech. Mech. · 2003 · 23 · 113
3. 10.1016/0020-7683(91)90048-K10.1016/0020-7683(91)90048-K ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.12.01610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.12.016 ↗
5. 10.1680/geot.55.5.373.6602310.1680/geot.55.5.373.66023 ↗
6. 10.1002/nag.24710.1002/nag.247 ↗
7. 10.1098/rspa.1997.010710.1098/rspa.1997.0107 ↗
8. 10.1680/geot.52.7.507.3875610.1680/geot.52.7.507.38756 ↗
9. 10.1680/geot.53.7.611.3738710.1680/geot.53.7.611.37387 ↗
10. Cundall · Géotechnique · 1979 · 29 · 4710.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47 ↗
11. 10.1016/0022-5096(72)90029-410.1016/0022-5096(72)90029-4 ↗
12. Einav · 2005 · 225
13. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.01210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.012 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00285-510.1016/S0167-6636(02)00285-5 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.161337210.1063/1.1613372 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0167-6636(97)00039-210.1016/S0167-6636(97)00039-2 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0749-6419(98)00019-910.1016/S0749-6419(98)00019-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00059-910.1016/S0022-5096(99)00059-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X ↗
20. 10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00073-X10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00073-X ↗
21. Houlsby · Géotechnique · 1999 · 49 · 49110.1680/geot.1999.49.4.491 ↗
22. McDowell · Géotechnique · 1998 · 48 · 66710.1680/geot.1998.48.5.667 ↗
23. Nakata · Géotechnique · 1999 · 49 · 56710.1680/geot.1999.49.5.567 ↗
24. 10.1115/1.141036610.1115/1.1410366 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.008 ↗
26. 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00072-010.1016/0020-7683(95)00072-0 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10665-004-3950-z10.1007/s10665-004-3950-z ↗
28. 10.1016/0022-5096(96)00015-410.1016/0022-5096(96)00015-4 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00083-810.1016/S0749-6419(00)00083-8 ↗
30. 10.1098/rspa.2000.067310.1098/rspa.2000.0673 ↗
31. 10.1016/0022-5096(71)90010-X10.1016/0022-5096(71)90010-X ↗
32. 10.1016/0167-6636(93)90028-P10.1016/0167-6636(93)90028-P ↗
33. 10.1007/3-540-17616-010.1007/3-540-17616-0 ↗
34. 10.1023/B:BITN.0000046817.60322.ed10.1023/B:BITN.0000046817.60322.ed ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0118175510.1007/BF01181755 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00707-003-0072-z10.1007/s00707-003-0072-z ↗
37. 10.1016/0022-5096(87)90036-610.1016/0022-5096(87)90036-6 ↗
38. Weibull · J. Appl. Mech. (ASME) · 1951 · 18 · 29310.1115/1.4010337 ↗