Coupling of peridynamic theory and the finite element method
Source abstract
Abstract
The finite element method is widely utilized for the numerical solution of structural problems. However, damage prediction using the finite element method can be very cumbersome because the derivatives of displacements are undefined at the discontinuities. In contrast, the peridynamic theory uses displacements rather than displacement derivatives in its formulation. Hence, peridynamic equations are valid everywhere, including discontinuities. Furthermore, the peridynamic theory does not require external criteria for crack initiation and propagation since material failure is invoked through the material response. However, the finite element method is numerically more efficient than the peridynamic theory. Hence, this study presents a method to couple the peridynamic theory and finite element analysis to take advantage of both methods. Peridynamics is used in the regions where failure is expected and the remaining regions are modeled utilizing the finite element method. Then, the present approach is demonstrated through a simple problem and predictions of the present approach are compared against both the peridynamic theory and finite element method. The damage simulation results for the present method are demonstrated by considering a plate with a circular cutout. I.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Askari · 2006
2. Belytschko · 1983 · 1
3. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
4. 10.1109/TC.1987.167694210.1109/TC.1987.1676942 ↗
5. Colavito · 2007
6. Colavito · 2007
7. Gerstle · 2004 · 949
8. Gerstle · 2005 · 54
9. 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00154-110.1016/S0045-7825(99)00154-1 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.finel.2007.08.01210.1016/j.finel.2007.08.012 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01087-010.1016/S0045-7825(96)01087-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00128-X10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00128-X ↗
13. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
14. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-010.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0 ↗
15. Silling · 2003 · 641
16. 10.1115/PVP2004-304910.1115/PVP2004-3049 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.02610.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.026 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2004.08.00410.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2004.08.004 ↗
19. Underwood · 1983 · 245
20. Xu · 2007
21. 10.1007/s00466-006-0115-010.1007/s00466-006-0115-0 ↗