journal article·2023-10

Double-sided friction stir welding of Nitronic-40 stainless steel for application in tokamak devices

Supreeth Gaddam, Ravi Sankar Haridas, Deepthi Tammana, Charlie Sanabria, Christopher J. Lammi, Diana Berman, Rajiv S. Mishra

Publisher page

Abstract

Nitrogen containing austenitic stainless steels (N-ASS) are widely utilized to fabricate various structural components in tokamak type fusion reactors owing to their suitable mechanical and functional properties. These components are exposed to a range of temperatures (4–500 K) and interact closely with the magnetic fields that are used to control and contain the plasma within the tokamak systems. Nitronic-40 (N40) or XM-11 stainless steel is one such N-ASS used for fabricating structural components in the magnetic and vacuum vessel systems in tokamak devices. Fabrication of most of the larger components in the magnetic and vacuum vessel systems typically involves some type of fusion-based welding process. This study presents a double-sided friction stir welding (FSW) approach as an alternative to fusion welding processes to join 12 mm thick N40 plates to obtain joints with a low fraction of δ ferrite (a detrimental ferromagnetic phase), high joint efficiency, no sensitization and loss of hardness in the heat affected zone, and minimal nitrogen desorption from the weld nugget. The double-sided FSW approach yielded superior weldments when compared to similar joints accomplished by fusion welding for application in tokamak devices.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Fisch · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1978 · 41 · 87310.1103/PhysRevLett.41.873 ↗
2. Creely · J. Plasma Phys. · 2020 · 86 · 110.1017/S0022377820001257 ↗
3. Barabash · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367-370 A · 2110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.017 ↗
4. Badrinarayan · UCLA J. Environ. Law Policy · 2011 · 29 · 13010.5070/L5291019963 ↗
5. Manheimer · Energy Environ. · 2016 · 27 · 76510.1177/0958305X16674636 ↗
6. Pradhan · Comm. Meet. Steady-State Oper. Magn. Fusion Dev. · 1999 · 482
7. Hartwig · Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 33 · 11LT0110.1088/1361-6668/abb8c0 ↗
8. Li · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2015 · 96-97 · 33810.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.06.106 ↗
9. Larbalestier · Cryogen. (Guildf) · 1973 · 13 · 160
10. Han · Appl. Supercond. · 2021 · 31 · 5
11. Walsh · Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2020 · 756
12. Savary · IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2012 · 22 · 38110.1109/TASC.2011.2174561 ↗
13. Mitchell · IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2012 · 22
14. Queral · Nucl. Mater. Energy. · 2022 · 30
15. Kumar · Mater. Des. · 2014 · 53 · 8610.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.029 ↗
16. Pfeif · 2015
17. Woo · ISIJ Int. · 2002 · 42 · 133410.2355/isijinternational.42.1334 ↗
18. Dayal · Int. Mater. Rev. · 2005 · 50 · 12910.1179/174328005X14348 ↗
19. Arun · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2019 · 271 · 12610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.031 ↗
20. Tseng · Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. · 2017 · 89 · 235510.1007/s00170-016-9280-2 ↗
21. Dak · J. Manuf. Process. · 2020 · 58 · 37710.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.019 ↗
22. Graham · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2018 · 458 · 1510.1016/j.jmmm.2018.02.092 ↗
23. Wegrzyn · Weld. Int. · 1992 · 6 · 69010.1080/09507119209548267 ↗
24. Saluja · Int. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. Appl. Sci. · 2015 · 3 · 23
25. Teels · 1974
26. Li · Mater. Des. · 2015 · 84 · 29110.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.103 ↗
27. Park · Mater. Sci. Forum. · 2007 · 539–543 · 375710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.3757 ↗
28. Garcia · Corros. Sci. · 2008 · 50 · 239010.1016/j.corsci.2008.06.016 ↗
29. Mohan · Chin. J. Mech. Eng. · 2021 · 34 · 13710.1186/s10033-021-00655-3 ↗
30. Li · Mater. Des. · 2017 · 118 · 20710.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.034 ↗
31. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials
32. 2020 · 634
33. Mishra · Mater. Sci. Eng. R · 2005 · 50 · 110.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001 ↗
34. Lima · J. Mater. Sci. · 2005 · 40 · 13910.1007/s10853-005-5699-9 ↗
35. Miyano · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 528 · 291710.1016/j.msea.2010.12.071 ↗
36. Singh · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 18 · 16510.1179/026708301125000384 ↗
37. Shaikh · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 1998 · 14 · 12910.1179/mst.1998.14.2.129 ↗
38. Gaddam · Mater. Des. · 2022 · 22110.1016/j.matdes.2022.110949 ↗
39. Vijaya Ramnath · Mater. Today Proc. · 2018 · 5 · 183210.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.282 ↗
40. Sandim · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2021 · 53910.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168336 ↗
41. Gupta · Mater. Res. Express · 2019 · 6
42. Masumura · Mater. Trans. · 2020 · 61 · 67810.2320/matertrans.H-M2020804 ↗
43. Shen · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2012 · 552 · 51410.1016/j.msea.2012.05.080 ↗
44. Misra · Metall. Mater. Trans. A-Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 43 · 528610.1007/s11661-012-1360-9 ↗
45. Misra · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2012 · 548 · 16110.1016/j.msea.2012.04.005 ↗
46. Mandal · Metall. Mater. Trans. A-Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. · 2020 · 51 · 388610.1007/s11661-020-05861-7 ↗