Numerical study on surface-heterogeneity-induced anisotropic impact dynamics of droplet
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Droplet impact on flat surfaces with heterogeneity is expected to trigger unusual impact dynamics, such as anisotropic spreading and directional rebounding, which in turn could be utilized in the control of droplet motion in many industrial processes. The present work illustrates a numerical study on droplet impact on a flat superhydrophobic substrate coated with a heterogeneous rectangle area, the influence of different positions and wettability of this heterogeneous area on the impact dynamics is investigated. The simulation results show the wettability of the heterogeneous area can impose significant influence on the spreading, retracting, and bouncing processes, especially when the heterogeneous area is located on a site other than the initial contact point, the bouncing of droplet is more likely to happen, and the contact time also becomes shorter. The clear pictures and analysis of the impact dynamics could advance the knowledge of how to control droplet motion by surface coatings.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Drop impact dynamics: splashing, spreading, receding, bouncing…10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092144 ↗
2. Drop impact on a solid surface10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034401 ↗
3. Topography driven spreading10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.036102 ↗
4. Transparent superhydrophobic/superhydrophilic coatings for self-cleaning and anti-fogging
5. Structured surfaces for a giant liquid slip10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.064501 ↗
6. Durability of nano-engineered TiO2 self-cleaning treatments on limestone10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.112 ↗
7. Design of anti-icing surfaces: smooth, textured or slippery?10.1038/natrevmats.2015.3 ↗
8. Superhydrophobic coatings fabricated with polytetrafluoroethylene and SiO2 nanoparticles by spraying process on carbon steel surfaces10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.068 ↗
9. Directed rebounding of droplets by microscale surface roughness gradients10.1063/1.3442500 ↗
10. Do droplets always move following the wettability gradient?10.1063/1.3592997 ↗
11. Controlling drop bouncing using surfaces with gradient features
12. Pancake bouncing on superhydrophobic surfaces10.1038/nphys2980 ↗
13. Pancake bouncing: simulations and theory and experimental verification10.1021/la5033916 ↗
14. Symmetry breaking in drop bouncing on curved surfaces10.1038/ncomms10034 ↗
15. Following or against topographic wettability gradient: movements of droplets on a micropatterned surface10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00438 ↗
16. Lateral motion of a droplet after impacting on groove-patterned superhydrophobic surfaces10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.03.013 ↗
17. Reducing the contact time of a bouncing drop10.1038/nature12740 ↗
18. Jetting micron-scale droplets onto chemically heterogeneous surfaces10.1021/la0353069 ↗
19. Many-body dissipative particle dynamics simulation of the anisotropic effect of droplet wetting on stripe-patterned heterogeneous surfaces10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.213 ↗
20. Initial spreading kinetics of highviscosity droplets on anisotropic surfaces10.1021/la903205e ↗
21. Anisotropic drop shapes on chemically striped surfaces10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.10.020 ↗
22. Anisotropic wetting of droplets on stripe-patterned chemically heterogeneous surfaces: effect of length ratio and deposition position10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02491 ↗
23. Nano-striped chemically anisotropic surfaces have near isotropic wettability10.1063/1.4980091 ↗
24. Steerable droplet bouncing for precise materials transportation10.1002/admi.201901033 ↗
25. Vapor-liquid coexistence in many-body dissipative particle dynamics10.1103/PhysRevE.68.066702 ↗
26. Spontaneous wetting transition of droplet coalescence on immersed micropillared surfaces10.1016/j.apm.2018.06.041 ↗
27. Tuning drop motion by chemical chessboard-patterned surfaces: a many-body dissipative particle dynamics study10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b04162 ↗
28. Analytical prediction of electrowetting-induced jumping motion for droplets on hydrophobic substrates10.1063/1.5109164 ↗
29. Self-cleaning of hydrophobic rough surfaces by coalescence-induced wetting transition10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03664 ↗
30. Viscosity measurement and simulation of microbubble wetting on flat surfaces with many-body dissipative particle dynamics model10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125559 ↗
31. Numerical study of a droplet impact on cylindrical objects: towards the anti-icing property of power transmission lines10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146155 ↗
32. Perspective: dissipative particle dynamics10.1063/1.4979514 ↗
33. Simulating microscopic hydrodynamic phenomena with dissipative particle dynamics10.1209/0295-5075/19/3/001 ↗
34. Dissipative particle dynamics: bridging the gap between atomistic and mesoscopic simulation10.1063/1.474784 ↗
35. A dissipative particle dynamics method for arbitrarily complex geometries10.1016/j.jcp.2017.11.014 ↗
36. New dissipative particle dynamics boundary condition for complex geometry10.7498/aps.68.20190533 ↗
37. An easy-to-use boundary condition in dissipative particle dynamics system10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.02.004 ↗
38. Many-body dissipative particle dynamics simulation of liquid/vapor and liquid/solid interactions10.1063/1.3590376 ↗