Sustainable apparel and circular fashion: Understanding Generation Y’s purchasing patterns and merchandising influences
Source abstract
Abstract
The fashion industry is witnessing a major paradigm shift because of the increasing consciousness about the environment and the changing preferences of the consumers. Sustainable fashion and circular fashion have appeared on the agenda because of their importance in reducing the effects on the environment, in addition to keeping pace with the rising demands of consumers. In order to determine the influences of Generation Y consumers on sustainable fashion and circular fashion, there is a need to study the behavior of consumers in terms of fashion purchase and the measures taken by fashion brands to satisfy the consumers’ demands generation-wise. Since Generation Y consumers are the generation of people growing up with an intensive idea about the environment and technology, they have distinct demands in favor of clothing items produced in ethical environments, in an eco-friendly manner, and with sustainable fashion trends. PLS–SEM methodology, which includes a survey of 500 individuals aged differently, both male and female, and consumers belonging to a different social status and possessing differing levels of education, is used for analyzing major parameters, such as affordability, brand consideration, use of eco-friendly materials, and digital marketing influences in fashion merchandising. Findings suggest that younger generations (consumers aged 29–32 years) are more concerned with affordability (50%), while older generations (37–above 44 years) are more interested in sustainability and ethical fashion (85%). Seventy percent of women participants are more concerned with making ecologically conscious and socially responsible purchasing decisions compared to men, who are more concerned with the functionality and online marketing of the product. Higher education and income are equally strong predictors of environmentally sustainable purchasing decisions with 91% each. Results indicate the need for the fashion industry to incorporate sustainable principles and transparent product labeling and marketing that are more in line with the preferences of Generation Y.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Environmental Sustainability in Business · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textile Engineering, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.00710.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.007 ↗
2. 10.1108/YC-12-2018-091410.1108/YC-12-2018-0914 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.01210.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.012 ↗
4. 10.3390/su1207280910.3390/su12072809 ↗
5. 10.1108/1463668031049475310.1108/14636680310494753 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-3-031-71052-0_410.1007/978-3-031-71052-0_4 ↗
7. 10.1108/0956423131132698710.1108/09564231311326987 ↗
8. 10.1002/sd.355810.1002/sd.3558 ↗
9. 10.1007/s42824-025-00176-710.1007/s42824-025-00176-7 ↗
10. 10.1038/s43017-020-0039-910.1038/s43017-020-0039-9 ↗
11. 10.1080/0959396090349830010.1080/09593960903498300 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10668-020-01173-310.1007/s10668-020-01173-3 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-981-97-5341-3_1910.1007/978-981-97-5341-3_19 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.10058010.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100580 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.03510.1016/j.rser.2016.09.035 ↗
16. 10.1177/002224291982564910.1177/0022242919825649 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jretai.2020.10.00810.1016/j.jretai.2020.10.008 ↗
18. 10.1177/027614671453593210.1177/0276146714535932 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.nanoso.2024.10124310.1016/j.nanoso.2024.101243 ↗
20. Hegab H, Shaban I, Jamil M, et al. Toward sustainable future: strategies, indicators, and challenges for implementing sustainable production systems. Sustain Mater Technol 2023; 36: e00617.
21. 10.1016/j.jretai.2020.11.00610.1016/j.jretai.2020.11.006 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.02.00310.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.02.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.02010.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.020 ↗
24. 10.1080/23311975.2021.199724710.1080/23311975.2021.1997247 ↗
25. 10.1111/ijcs.1256010.1111/ijcs.12560 ↗
26. 10.1007/s42824-026-00219-710.1007/s42824-026-00219-7 ↗
27. Koszewska M. Circular economy in textiles and apparel. Elsevier, 2019, pp.183–206.
28. Ghouse SM, Shekhar R, Chaudhary M. Sustainable choices of Gen Y and Gen Z: exploring green horizons. Manag Sustain 2024; 4: 533–559.
29. 10.1007/978-3-031-45848-4_1010.1007/978-3-031-45848-4_10 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.03210.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.032 ↗
31. 10.1108/1747361121120393910.1108/17473611211203939 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.01410.1016/j.chb.2016.03.014 ↗
33. 10.1108/MIP-09-2020-042110.1108/MIP-09-2020-0421 ↗
34. 10.3390/su1315846910.3390/su13158469 ↗
35. 10.1080/17543266.2014.99691710.1080/17543266.2014.996917 ↗
36. 10.1108/RJTA-17-01-2013-B00210.1108/RJTA-17-01-2013-B002 ↗
37. 10.3390/su1507620210.3390/su15076202 ↗
38. Coscieme L, Manshoven S, Gillabel J, et al. A framework of circular business models for fashion and textiles: the role of business-model, technical, and social innovation. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 2022; 18: 451–462.
39. 10.1057/978-1-349-95968-6_210.1057/978-1-349-95968-6_2 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.12304410.1016/j.techfore.2023.123044 ↗
41. 10.1057/s41262-019-00151-z10.1057/s41262-019-00151-z ↗
42. 10.1007/978-3-030-66119-9_210.1007/978-3-030-66119-9_2 ↗
43. 10.3390/su1709412410.3390/su17094124 ↗
44. 10.3390/en1411320710.3390/en14113207 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.12.00110.1016/j.jretconser.2012.12.001 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.04.01510.1016/j.jretconser.2016.04.015 ↗
47. 10.1111/ijcs.1279410.1111/ijcs.12794 ↗
48. Mohr I, Fuxman L, Mahmoud AB. A triple-trickle theory for sustainable fashion adoption: the rise of a luxury trend. J Fash Mark Manag 2022; 26: 640–660.
49. 10.1007/s13278-023-01050-710.1007/s13278-023-01050-7 ↗
50. 10.1108/IJCHM-10-2015-061110.1108/IJCHM-10-2015-0611 ↗
51. 10.1007/978-981-10-2440-5_1210.1007/978-981-10-2440-5_12 ↗
52. 10.1108/YC-10-2020-122410.1108/YC-10-2020-1224 ↗
53. 10.1108/1356328111115685310.1108/13563281111156853 ↗
54. 10.1108/978-1-78973-437-92019100610.1108/978-1-78973-437-920191006 ↗
55. Pranta AD, Repon MR, Haji A, et al. Sustainable merchandising for recycled textiles and apparel in the western apparel industry: strategies, challenges and market opportunities. J Eng Fiber Fabr 2025; 20: 25–36.
56. 10.1108/APJML-08-2017-018310.1108/APJML-08-2017-0183 ↗
57. 10.3390/bs1305038610.3390/bs13050386 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.29210.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.292 ↗
59. 10.3390/su910191110.3390/su9101911 ↗
60. Valaei N, Nikhashemi SR. Generation Y consumers’ buying behaviour in fashion apparel industry: a moderation analysis. J Fash Mark Manag 2017; 21: 523–543.
61. Hill J, Lee H. Young Generation Y consumers’ perceptions of sustainability in the apparel industry. J Fash Mark Manag 2012; 16: 477–491.
62. 10.1007/s42824-025-00204-610.1007/s42824-025-00204-6 ↗
63. 10.1080/0965254X.2022.216048310.1080/0965254X.2022.2160483 ↗
64. 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00680.x10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00680.x ↗
65. Bakewell C, Mitchell V, Rothwell M. UK Generation Y male fashion consciousness. J Fash Mark Manag 2006; 10: 169–180.
66. 10.1080/10548408.2018.146885110.1080/10548408.2018.1468851 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.00810.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.008 ↗
68. 10.3390/info1108039610.3390/info11080396 ↗
69. 10.1108/JFMM-08-2013-009610.1108/JFMM-08-2013-0096 ↗
70. 10.1108/1352275131132612510.1108/13522751311326125 ↗
71. 10.1007/s11205-024-03328-510.1007/s11205-024-03328-5 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.clwas.2025.10022110.1016/j.clwas.2025.100221 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.02710.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.027 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12894510.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128945 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.11627710.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116277 ↗
76. 10.1088/1755-1315/729/1/01213710.1088/1755-1315/729/1/012137 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.32010.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.320 ↗
78. 10.3390/su1209381810.3390/su12093818 ↗
79. 10.1108/1747361101109392510.1108/17473611011093925 ↗
80. Ortegón Cortazar L, Cachón-Rodríguez G, Pascual Nebreda L, et al. Motivational dimensions of slow fashion to promote environmentally and socially sustainable consumption in the fashion industry. J Fash Mark Manag 2025; 29: 761–780.
81. 10.1186/s40691-018-0164-y10.1186/s40691-018-0164-y ↗
82. 10.1080/13675567.2022.207681710.1080/13675567.2022.2076817 ↗
83. 10.1108/MD-05-2019-058710.1108/MD-05-2019-0587 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13717610.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137176 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12385510.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123855 ↗
86. 10.1007/s40888-019-00145-910.1007/s40888-019-00145-9 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.04810.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 ↗
88. 10.3390/su14201342210.3390/su142013422 ↗
89. 10.1080/00405167.2023.218206210.1080/00405167.2023.2182062 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.nexres.2025.10092610.1016/j.nexres.2025.100926 ↗
91. 10.1111/poms.1359610.1111/poms.13596 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.10058110.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100581 ↗
93. 10.1007/s43615-021-00040-110.1007/s43615-021-00040-1 ↗
94. Kant Hvass K, Pedersen ERG. Toward circular economy of fashion. J Fash Mark Manag 2019; 23: 345–365.
95. 10.1108/0736376121120635710.1108/07363761211206357 ↗
96. 10.1108/IJHMA-05-2019-004810.1108/IJHMA-05-2019-0048 ↗
97. Wahyuningsih Nasution H, Yeni YH, et al. A comparative study of generations X, Y, Z in food purchasing behavior: the relationships among customer value, satisfaction, and Ewom. Cogent Bus Manag 2022; 9: 2105585.
98. 10.1108/0959055031046199410.1108/09590550310461994 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.02.00310.1016/j.jretconser.2019.02.003 ↗
100. 10.1108/APJML-08-2023-079310.1108/APJML-08-2023-0793 ↗