Compressibility and Rarefaction Effects on Particle Dynamics and Heat Transfer in Aerosol Deposition Process
Source abstract
Abstract
The aerosol deposition (AD) method is an emerging coating technique to create a dense ceramic or metal layer on a substrate through the kinetic impaction and cumulative deposition of ultrafine solid particles under near-vacuum conditions. Prediction of the particles’ impact velocity and temperature during the AD process is crucial in enhancing the coating quality. In the present work, a two-way coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian model is developed for an AD system equipped with a converging-barrel nozzle to simulate the supersonic gas flow, particle in-flight behavior, as well as particle conditions upon impact on a flat substrate. The focus of the current study is to understand the effects of compressibility and rarefaction on particle velocity and temperature during the AD process. The effects of compressibility and rarefaction can be assessed using the Mach and Knudsen numbers. Therefore, different models for the drag coefficient and the heat transfer coefficient that take into account the Knudsen, Mach, and Reynolds number effects are implemented into the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models. The results show that compressibility and rarefaction have significant influence on the particle temperature and velocity. As the particle size reduces, the effects of compressibility and rarefaction become more important.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows · Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, California State University, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. An Overview of the Aerosol Deposition Method: Process Fundamentals and New Trends in Materials Applications
2. Inflight Particle Behavior in the Vacuum Kinetic Spray Process10.1007/s11666-017-0614-x ↗
3. Aerosol Deposition of Anode Functional Layer for Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130924 ↗
4. Huang, R., and Fukanuma, H. (2015). Future Development of Thermal Spray Coatings, Woodhead Publishing.
5. Smith, M.F. (2007). The Cold Spray Materials Deposition Process, Elsevier.
6. Aerosol Deposition of Ceramic Thick Films at Room Temperature: Densification Mechanism of Ceramic Layers10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01030.x ↗
7. Room Temperature Impact Consolidation (RTIC) of Fine Ceramic Powder by Aerosol Deposition Method and Applications to Microdevices10.1007/s11666-008-9163-7 ↗
8. The AD Method: An Innovative Coating Technology That Defies Conventional Wisdom, AIST Stories: From AIST to the Innovative World
9. The 2016 Thermal Spray Roadmap10.1007/s11666-016-0473-x ↗
10. Microstructure and Electrochemical Properties of LSGM Thin Film Deposited by Vacuum Cold Spray for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
11. Numerical Simulation on Impact Velocity of Ceramic Particles Propelled by Supersonic Nitrogen Gas Flow in Vacuum Chamber10.2320/matertrans.T-MRA2007833 ↗
12. Supersonic Nozzle Flow Simulations for Particle Coating Applications: Effects of Shockwaves, Nozzle Geometry, Ambient Pressure, and Substrate Location upon Flow Characteristics10.1007/s11666-010-9542-8 ↗
13. Computational Research on Factors Affecting Particle Velocity in a Vacuum Kinetic Spray Process10.1007/s11666-019-00941-6 ↗
14. Effect of Gas Flow Rates and Nozzle Throat Width on Deposition of α-Alumina Films of Granule Spray in Vacuum10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.02.021 ↗
15. Effect of Starting Powder Morphology on Film Texture for Bismuth Layer-Structured Ferroelectrics Prepared by Aerosol Deposition Method10.7567/JJAP.56.06GH02 ↗
16. Fabrication of High-Quality Alumina Coating through Novel, Dual-Particle Aerosol Deposition10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.142 ↗
17. Deposition Methods for Microstructured and Nanostructured Coatings on Metallic Bone Implants: A Review10.1155/2017/5812907 ↗
18. Glosse, P., Denneler, S., Stier, O., and Moos, R. (2021). Investigation of the Powder Aerosol Deposition Method Using Shadowgraph Imaging. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14102502 ↗
19. Narrow and Thin Copper Linear Pattern Deposited by Vacuum Cold Spraying and Deposition Behavior Simulation10.1007/s11666-020-01102-w ↗
20. Lavernia Effect of Particle Size, Morphology, and Hardness on Cold Gas Dynamic Sprayed Aluminum Alloy Coatings10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.232 ↗
21. The Effects of Powder Properties on In-Flight Particle Velocity and Deposition Process during Low Pressure Cold Spray Process10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.03.031 ↗
22. Özdemir, O.Ç., Conahan, J.M., and Müftü, S. (2020). Particle Velocimetry, CFD, and the Role of Particle Sphericity in Cold Spray. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10121254 ↗
23. Effect of Particle Shape on Mechanics of Impact in the Deposition of Titanium Nanoparticles on a Titanium Substrate10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125880 ↗
24. Optimization of Supersonic Nozzle Flow for Titanium Dioxide Thin-Film Coating by Aerosol Deposition10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.07.006 ↗
25. Relationship between Impact Velocity of Al2O3 Particles and Deposition Efficiency in Aerosol Deposition Method10.1007/s11666-013-0031-8 ↗
26. Effect of Substrate Temperature on Deposition Behavior of Copper Particles on Substrate Surfaces in the Cold Spray Process10.1007/s11666-007-9121-9 ↗
27. Ceramic Coatings Deposited from Fine Particles by Different Spraying Processes10.1007/s11666-020-01095-6 ↗
28. Effect of Stand-off Distance for Cold Gas Spraying of Fine Ceramic Particles (<5 μm) under Low Vacuum and Room Temperature Using Nano-Particle Deposition System (NPDS)10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.09.043 ↗
29. Application of a Holistic 3D Model to Estimate State of Cold Spray Titanium Particles10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.075 ↗
30. Numerical Modeling of Aerosol Deposition Process10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.04.094 ↗
31. Numerical Modeling of Suspension HVOF Spray10.1007/s11666-015-0364-6 ↗
32. Modelling Knudsen Number Effects in Suspension High Velocity Oxy Fuel Thermal Spray10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119454 ↗
33. Compressibility and Rarefaction Effects on Drag of a Spherical Particle10.2514/1.28943 ↗
34. Size Effects of Brittle Particles in Aerosol Deposition—Molecular Dynamics Simulation10.1007/s11666-020-01149-9 ↗
35. Impact Behavior for Successful Particle–Particle Bonding in Vacuum Kinetic Spraying10.1007/s11666-020-01078-7 ↗
36. Shock Absorption Effect on Particle Fragmentation and Microstructural Features of Vacuum-Kinetic-Sprayed Al2O3 Film on Polycarbonate Substrate10.1007/s11666-020-01094-7 ↗
37. Shock-Induced Plasticity and Fragmentation Phenomena during Alumina Deposition in the Vacuum Kinetic Spraying Process10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.12.008 ↗
38. Experimental and Numerical Study for Cu Metal Coatings at Room Temperature via Powder Spray Process10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.08.075 ↗
39. Particle Velocity and Deposition Efficiency in the Cold Spray Process10.1361/105996399770350278 ↗
40. Influence of Process Parameters on the Aerosol Deposition (AD) of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Particles10.1007/s11666-020-01101-x ↗
41. A Comprehensive Review on Fluid Dynamics and Transport of Suspension/Liquid Droplets and Particles in High-Velocity Oxygen-Fuel (HVOF) Thermal Spray10.3390/coatings5040576 ↗
42. (2013). ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, ANSYS Inc.
43. Versteeg, H., and Malalasekera, W. (2007). An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, Pearson Education Limited. [2nd ed.].
44. Pope, S. (2000). Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840531 ↗
45. Lilley, G.M. (1993). Turbulence Modelling for CFD, D.C. Wilcox DCW Industries.
46. Bradshaw, P. (1971). An Introduction to Turbulence and Its Measurement, Elsevier Science & Technology.
47. Drag Coefficient of Particles in a Rocket Nozzle10.2514/3.4119 ↗
48. O’Rourke, P.J. (1981). Collective Drop Effects on Vaporizing Liquid Sprays. [Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University].
49. An Investigation of Particle Trajectories in Two-Phase Flow Systems10.1017/S0022112072001806 ↗
50. Drag Coefficient for Particles in Rarefied, Low Mach–Number Flows10.1016/B978-0-08-017035-0.50027-6 ↗
51. Hermsen, R.W. Review of Particle Drag Models. Proceedings of the JANAF Performance Standartization Subcommittee 12th Meeting Minutes, Chemical Propulsion Information Agency, Columbia, MD, USA.
52. Clift, R., Grace, J.R., and Weber, M.E. (1978). Bubbles, Drops, and Particles, Academic Press.
53. Crowe, C.T., Schwarzkopf, J.D., Sommerfeld, M., and Tsuji, Y. (2011). Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles, CRC Press. [2nd ed.].10.1201/b11103 ↗
54. Evaporation from Drops, Part I
55. Evaporation from Drops, Part II
56. Heat Transfer from Spheres to a Rarefied Gas in Subsonic Flow10.1115/1.4014445 ↗
57. Study of the Highly Underexpanded Sonic Jet10.2514/3.3386 ↗
58. Influence of Nozzle Geometry on Underexpanded Axisymmetric Free Jet Characteristics10.1007/s00193-012-0391-x ↗
59. Effects of Axisymmetric Sonic Nozzle Geometry on Mach Disk Characteristics10.2514/3.7751 ↗
60. Derivation of the Free-jet Mach-disk Location Using the Entropy-balance Principle10.1063/1.861039 ↗
61. A Self-Consistent Scheme for Understanding Particle Impact and Adhesion in the Aerosol Deposition Process10.1007/s11666-021-01164-4 ↗