journal article·2020-09-17Open access

In Vitro Analysis of Quality of Dental Adhesive Bond Systems Applied in Various Conditions

Agata Trzcionka, Ruta Narbutaite, Alma Pranckeviciene, Rytis Maskeliūnas, Robertas Damaševičius, Gintautas Narvydas, Dawid Połap, Katarzyna Mocny-Pachońska, Marcin Wozniak, Marta Tanasiewicz

Coatings· Volume 10· Issue 9

Abstract

Introduction: There are several methods of reducing a microleakage, and one of them is choosing appropriate adhesive material. The aim of the work was the in vitro analysis of 4 bonds: 3M ESPE “Single bond”, Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active”, Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal”, and Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”. Material and methods: 136 healthy molar teeth were collected and randomly split into 4 groups and Vth Class cavities were prepared. Chosen adhesives were used in four groups of teeth with the same composite. Teeth were the thermocycled, sealed, covered with lacquer, and submerged in 1% methylene blue solution for 24 h. After the thermocycling, the vertices of each tooth were sealed using dental wax. Each tooth was then fully covered with lacquer. All teeth were then submerged into 1% methylene blue solution for 24 h in room temperature. In the next step they were transversely cut through a center of restoration. The Olympus BX43 microscope was used to photograph each cut tooth. With the usage of Olympus stream software, measurement of the dye’s leakage was performed. Results. The statistical analysis proved that the most effective material when applied to ideally prepared cavity surface was Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active”. The second material was 3M ESPE “Single Bond”, third—Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal” and fourth—Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”. The most effective material applied to a too-dry surface was Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active”, second—3M ESPE “Single Bond”, third—Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal” and fourth—Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”. When it comes to too damp surfaces the best results were obtained with Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active” then Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal”, 3M ESPE “Single Bond” and Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”. Conclusion: The level of cavity dampness influences the quality of adhesives. Better results are obtained with over-dried surfaces than over-damp, which is connected with the dilution of the material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mediacl Sciences in Zabrze, Department of Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics, Medical University of Silesia, Plac Akademicki 17, 41-902 Bytom, Poland

Faculty of Odontology, Department of Dental and Oral Pathology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eivenių g. 2, 50103 Kaunas, Lithuania

Faculty of Informatics, Department of Multimedia Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, K. Baršausko 59-A338, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania

Department of Applied Informatics, Vytautas Magnus University, LT-44404 Kaunas, Lithuania

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Department of Control Systems, Kaunas University of Technology, K. Baršausko 59-A338, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania

Faculty of Applied Mathematics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Evaluating the microleakage between dentin and composite materials10.17219/dmp/91780 ↗
2. Evaluation of microleakage with total etch, self-etch and universal adhesive systems in Class V restorations: An in vitro study
3. The Relevance of Micro-Leakage Studies
4. Review of microleakage evaluation tools10.4103/jioh.jioh_160_17 ↗
5. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives10.1016/0109-5641(94)90070-1 ↗
6. Shear bond strength and quantitative microleakage of a multipurpose dental adhesive system resin bonded to dentin10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80071-X ↗
7. Shear bond strengths and microleakage of four types of dentin adhesive materials10.5005/jcdp-5-1-63 ↗
8. Microleakage Evaluation of Adhesive Systems Following Pulp Chamber Irrigation with Sodium Hypochlorite
9. A Comparative Study of Microleakage on Dental Surfaces Bonded with Three Self-Etch Adhesive Systems Treated with the Er: YAG Laser and Bur
10. Trends in restorative composites research: What is in the future?
11. Bonding efficiency and durability: Current possibilities
12. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.10.001 ↗
13. Detection of Dental Filling Using Pixels Color Recognition10.1007/978-3-319-99972-2_28 ↗
14. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of newer generation dentin bonding agents: An in vitro study10.4103/0970-9290.179837 ↗
15. Microleakage and shear bond strength of composite restorations under cycling conditions10.2341/16-132-L ↗
16. Leakage testing for different adhesive systems and composites to permanent teeth10.4103/1119-3077.171417 ↗
17. Evaluation of microleakage in class V composite restorations using dye penetration and micro-CT10.1007/s00784-015-1676-0 ↗
18. Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations after Desensitizing Surface Treatment with Er: YAG and CO2 Lasers10.5978/islsm.16-OR-20 ↗
19. Microleakage of Self-Etch Adhesive System in Class V Cavities Prepared by Using Er:YAG Laser with Different Pulse Modes10.1089/pho.2015.3926 ↗
20. Evaluation of the microleakage of different class V cavities prepared by using Er:YAG laser; ultrasonic device, and conventional rotary instruments with two dentin bonding systems (an in vitro study)10.1007/s10103-014-1519-2 ↗
21. Accuracy and reproducibility of probe forces during simulated periodontal pocket depth measurements10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.02.001 ↗
22. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to surface-treated feldspathic porcelain after thermocycling10.1177/0391398818756181 ↗
23. The effect of five kinds surface treatment agents on the bond strength to various ceramics with thermocycler aging10.4012/dmj.2016-383 ↗
24. Coatings in dentistry—A review of some basic principles10.3390/coatings2030138 ↗
25. Maj, A., Trzcionka, A., Twardawa, H., and Tanasiewicz, M. (2020). A comparative clinical study of the self- adhering Flowable composite resin Vertise Flow and the traditional flowable resin Premise Flow. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10080800 ↗
26. Effect of double-layer application on bond quality of adhesive systems10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.008 ↗
27. Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations10.1007/s00784-012-0846-6 ↗
28. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine—Old vine in new bottles?10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004 ↗