Supplier Selection Fuzzy Model in Supply Chain Management: Vietnamese Cafe Industry Case
Source abstract
Abstract
Supplier selection is a vital part of the supply chain and is also a current issue that concerns businesses today as supplier quality directly affects the operations of the organization. Choosing the right supplier can help businesses increase productivity, competitiveness in the market, and profits without having to lower the quality of the products. However, choosing a supplier is not a simple matter, it requires businesses to consider many aspects about their suppliers. Therefore, the goal of this study is to propose an integrated model consisting of two models: Fuzzy Analytics Network Process (Fuzzy-ANP) model and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) to solve the problem above. The Fuzzy-ANP model was developed to evaluate the weightings of the supplier selection criteria, and the WASPAS Model was used to rank the suppliers. An example of supplier selection in the coffee industry in Vietnam was studied to validate the model, namely 5 main criteria, with 16 sub-criteria, and 7 suppliers. The model test results show that the Fuzzy ANP and WASPAS integration model was suitable. In future, these developing models can apply to other industries or integrate with other models.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management · Sustainable Supply Chain Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Wikipedia, Coffee production in Vietnam, Wikimedia Foundation Incorporated, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_production_in_Vietnam.
2. N. T. H. Van, Lich su du nhap cay ca phe vao Viet Nam, PrimeCoffea, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://primecoffea.com/lich-su-cay-ca-phe-viet-nam.html.
3. Employing fuzzy ANP for green supplier selection and order allocations: A case study
4. A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.008 ↗
5. An analysis of vendor selection: Systems and decisions10.1111/j.1745-493X.1966.tb00818.x ↗
6. Supplier evaluation and selection via Taguchi loss functions and an AHP10.1007/s00170-004-2227-z ↗
7. An approach to vendor performance evaluation
8. Supplier selection and evaluation in small versus large electronics firms
9. Integrated FANP-f-MIGP model for supplier selection in the renewable energy sector10.3846/16111699.2017.1325777 ↗
10. Solar panel supplier selection for the photovoltaic system design by using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches10.3390/en11081989 ↗
11. Selecting container port via a fuzzy ANP-based approach: A case study in the Marmara Region10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.001 ↗
12. A Multi-criteria decision making method to compare support structures for offshore wind turbines
13. A hybrid fuzzy analysis network process (FANP) and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) approaches for solid waste to energy plant location selection in Vietnam10.3390/app8071100 ↗
14. A hybrid ANP model in fuzzy environments for strategic alliance partner selection in the airline industry10.1016/j.asoc.2011.01.024 ↗
15. Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.001 ↗
16. A fuzzy risk assessment model for hospital information system implementation10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.129 ↗
17. A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information10.1016/j.compind.2010.10.009 ↗
18. Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organisation10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.057 ↗
19. A fuzzy ANP model integrated with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks to prioritize intelligent power grid systems
20. An integrated fuzzy QFD framework for new product development10.1007/s10696-011-9076-5 ↗
21. Purchasing's role in environmental management: Cross-functional development of grounded theory10.1111/j.1745-493X.2001.tb00102.x ↗
22. Evaluating digital video recorder systems using analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.010 ↗
23. Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating10.1016/j.eswa.2013.06.040 ↗
24. Multi-person selection of the best wind turbine based on the multi-criteria integrated additive-multiplicative utility function10.3846/13923730.2014.932836 ↗
25. Supplier selection using SWARA and WASPAS–a case study of Indian cement industry10.1108/MBE-07-2018-0041 ↗
26. Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar projects in Iran: New application of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.083 ↗
27. Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making10.15388/Informatica.2014.01 ↗
28. Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF)10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.031 ↗
29. Using QSPM and WASPAS methods for determining outsourcing strategies10.3846/16111699.2014.908789 ↗
30. Note on group consistency in analytic hierarchy process10.1016/j.ejor.2007.07.007 ↗
31. Saaty · The Analytic Hierarchy Process-Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation · 1980a
32. Saaty · The Analytic Hierarchy Process · 1980b
33. Saaty · The Analytic Hierarchy Process · 1980
34. MacCrimon · Decisionmaking Among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach · 1986
35. One of a kind decisions involving weighted multiple objectives and disparate alternatives