Random-Sequence DNA Oligomers Make Liquid Crystals: A Case of Collective Ordering in a Superdiverse Environment
Source abstract
Abstract
The availability of synthetic, analytical, and predictive tools makes DNA an ideal platform, not yet considered, to investigate statistical and soft matter physics. Here we report and interpret the equilibrium collective ordering in solutions of random-sequence DNA (rsDNA) oligomers of lengths L = 8 and L = 12. Despite the extreme molecular diversity inherent in rsDNA solutions, which for L = 12 are composed of 20 million distinct molecular species, these systems develop long-range columnar liquid crystal (LC) ordering when equilibrated at high osmotic pressure. By a combination of experimental models and computed statistics, we demonstrate that the residual end-to-end attraction between rsDNA duplexes, which typically terminate with various forms of pairing errors, is indeed sufficient to drive LC ordering. The resulting narrow range of isotropic-LC phase coexistence, in seeming contrast with the variety of phase behaviors of the species composing rsDNA, demonstrates that the (nearly) continuum distribution of molecular interaction strengths effectively reduces the tendency for demixing instead of enhancing it, in line with theoretical modeling.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry · Protein Structure and Dynamics · Origins and Evolution of Life
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento SIMAU, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy
Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche e Medicina Traslazionale, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20129 Milano, Italy
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.05840110.1103/PhysRevLett.131.058401 ↗
2. 10.1088/1478-3975/ac55f910.1088/1478-3975/ac55f9 ↗
3. 10.1073/pnas.210855111810.1073/pnas.2108551118 ↗
4. Milo R. · 2016
5. Kauffman S. A. · 199310.1093/oso/9780195079517.001.0001 ↗
6. 10.1016/s0092-8240(05)80008-410.1016/s0092-8240(05)80008-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.10.04310.1016/j.bpj.2016.10.043 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.12.03110.1016/j.bpj.2016.12.031 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.03314410.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033144 ↗
10. Calladine C. R. · 2004
11. 10.1126/science.114382610.1126/science.1143826 ↗
12. 10.1021/ma201962x10.1021/ma201962x ↗
13. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.101005110.1371/journal.pcbi.1010051 ↗
14. 10.1073/pnas.111746310910.1073/pnas.1117463109 ↗
15. 10.1038/319618a010.1038/319618a0 ↗
16. 10.1038/418214a10.1038/418214a ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms742410.1038/ncomms7424 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0582110.1021/acsnano.8b05821 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-023-38163-810.1038/s41467-023-38163-8 ↗
20. 10.3390/ijms2306307210.3390/ijms23063072 ↗
21. 10.1080/02678292.2018.151912310.1080/02678292.2018.1519123 ↗
22. 10.1073/pnas.93.9.426110.1073/pnas.93.9.4261 ↗
23. 10.1103/physrevlett.78.89510.1103/physrevlett.78.895 ↗
24. 10.1038/srep0687710.1038/srep06877 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.071131910510.1073/pnas.0711319105 ↗
26. 10.1104/pp.91.2.76610.1104/pp.91.2.766 ↗
27. 10.1073/pnas.051104810310.1073/pnas.0511048103 ↗
28. 10.1021/ma970381+10.1021/ma970381+ ↗
29. 10.1016/s0006-3495(01)75705-010.1016/s0006-3495(01)75705-0 ↗
30. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.14180010.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141800 ↗
31. Flory P. J. · 1953
32. 10.4324/978020380907510.4324/9780203809075 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c0143510.1021/acs.biomac.3c01435 ↗
34. 10.1073/pnas.192088611710.1073/pnas.1920886117 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biochi.2008.02.00910.1016/j.biochi.2008.02.009 ↗
36. 10.1093/nass/48.1.10710.1093/nass/48.1.107 ↗
37. 10.1021/ja804718c10.1021/ja804718c ↗
38. 10.1002/cbic.20130077310.1002/cbic.201300773 ↗
39. 10.7554/elife.9015610.7554/elife.90156 ↗