Programmable Oxygen-Ligand Fields Encode Atomic Cu Coordination for Pathway-Selective CO 2 –Nitrate Conversion to Urea
Source abstract
Abstract
Precise control over the coordination environment of single-atom catalysts remains a central challenge for steering multielectron electrocatalytic reactions. Here, we present oxygen-ligand programming─a chemical strategy that uses tailored surface carbonyl, hydroxyl, and carboxyl groups as programmable ligands to deterministically encode the coordination geometry and electronic configuration of atomic Cu anchored on carbon nanotubes. Atomic layer deposition on these ligand-defined interfaces generates chemically distinct Cu–O–C coordination motifs, whose electronic fingerprints are resolved by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The programmed ligand fields selectively bias the stabilization of key intermediates: hydroxyl-derived motifs favor the O-bound *CONH species, carboxyl motifs overstabilize *NH x, while carbonyl-programmed motifs uniquely balance *CO and *NH 2 adsorption, thereby unlocking efficient C–N coupling. This deterministic control over the reaction landscape yields a urea formation rate of 482 mg h –1 g cat –1 and a Faradaic efficiency of 61.2% at −0.6 V. Beyond urea synthesis, oxygen-ligand programming shows a broadly applicable conceptual framework for coordination-tailored single-atom catalysis and molecular pathway design in heterogeneous electrosynthesis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Western University of Ontario, 1150 Richmond Street, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada
Natural Resources Canada, CanmetMATERIALS, 183 Longwood Rd S, Hamilton, Ontario L8P 0A5, Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Natural Resources Canada
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1574310.1038/nature15743 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41598-022-18773-w10.1038/s41598-022-18773-w ↗
3. 10.1039/D4EE00561A10.1039/D4EE00561A ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.03010.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.030 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.10327910.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103279 ↗
6. Quinn, R. DTN retail fertilizer trends . 2022. https://greatamericancrop.com/news-resources/article/2022/12/14/dtn-retail-fertilizer-trends (Accessed 2026).
7. 10.1038/s41557-020-0481-910.1038/s41557-020-0481-9 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-024-45522-610.1038/s41467-024-45522-6 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20240901910.1002/anie.202409019 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20240969710.1002/adma.202409697 ↗
11. 10.1039/D5QI00151J10.1039/D5QI00151J ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20242370610.1002/anie.202423706 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16555910.1016/j.cej.2025.165559 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13268210.1016/j.cej.2021.132682 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12186210.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121862 ↗
16. 10.1039/C9CP04624K10.1039/C9CP04624K ↗
17. 10.1039/C7CS00156H10.1039/C7CS00156H ↗
18. 10.1080/00958972.2013.80086610.1080/00958972.2013.800866 ↗
19. Miessler G. L. · 2014
20. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0239910.1021/acscatal.5b02399 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.05110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20220602510.1002/adma.202206025 ↗
23. 10.1039/B819318P10.1039/B819318P ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20200042610.1002/anie.202000426 ↗
25. 10.1002/ange.20190355310.1002/ange.201903553 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c0063310.1021/acs.accounts.3c00633 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20221095810.1002/anie.202210958 ↗
28. 10.1002/ange.20241062510.1002/ange.202410625 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20230002010.1002/adma.202300020 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.12593910.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125939 ↗
31. Lazard Energy storage, Lazard LCOE Levelized Cost Of Energy+ ; Lazard: London, 2024. pp. 16–24.
32. Mosheim R. · 2019
33. 10.1021/la901128k10.1021/la901128k ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.08.03410.1016/j.carbon.2010.08.034 ↗