Surface morphology and preferential orientation growth of TaC crystals formed by chemical vapor deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract TaC film was deposited on (002) graphite sheet by isothermal chemical vapor deposition using TaCl5–Ar–C3H6 mixtures, with deposition temperature 1200 °C and pressure about 200 Pa. The influence of deposition position (or deposition rate) on preferential orientation and surface morphology of TaC crystals were investigated by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy methods. The deposits are TaC plus trace of C. The crystals are large individual columns with pyramidal-shape at deposition rate of 32.4–37.3 μm/h, complex columnar at 37.3–45.6 μm/h, lenticular-like at 45.6–54.6 μm/h and cauliflower-like at 54.6–77.3 μm/h, with , near , and no clear preferential orientation, respectively. These results agree in part with the preditions of the Pangarov's model of the relationship between deposition rate and preferential growth orientation. The growth mechanism of TaC crystals in , near , and no clear preferential orientation can be fairly explained by the growth parameter α with Van der Drift's model, deterioration model and Meakin model. Furthermore, a nucleation and coalescence model is also proposed to explain the formation mechanism of lenticular-like crystals.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Tang · Mater. Sci. Eng., A Struct. Mater.: Prop. Microstruct. Process. · 2007 · 465 · 110.1016/j.msea.2007.02.040 ↗
2. Choy · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2003 · 48 · 5710.1016/S0079-6425(01)00009-3 ↗
3. He · Rare Met. Mater. Eng. · 2004 · 33 · 490
4. Зеликман · 1990
5. Li · Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China · 2005 · 15 · 1206
6. Chen · Thin Solid Films · 2008 · 516 · 824810.1016/j.tsf.2008.03.016 ↗
7. Bühler · J. Cryst. Growth · 2000 · 209 · 77910.1016/S0022-0248(99)00658-2 ↗
8. Radmilovic · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2007 · 16 · 7410.1016/j.diamond.2006.03.017 ↗
9. Dollet · Thin Solid Films · 2002 · 406 · 11810.1016/S0040-6090(01)01792-8 ↗
10. Yang · J. Cryst. Growth · 2006 · 294 · 38910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.05.035 ↗
11. Nomura · J. Cryst. Growth · 2002 · 235 · 22410.1016/S0022-0248(01)01773-0 ↗
12. Staia · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 1996 · 86–87 · 43210.1016/S0257-8972(96)02981-7 ↗
13. Chen · Chinese J. Nonferr. Metal. · 2008 · 18 · 1377
14. Dagamseh · Thin Solid Film · 2008 · 516 · 784410.1016/j.tsf.2008.05.009 ↗
15. Korotkov · Thin Solid Films · 2006 · 502 · 7910.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.248 ↗
16. 1967
17. Wagner · Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. · 2008 · 26 · 12010.1016/j.ijrmhm.2007.01.010 ↗
18. Silva · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2005 · 14 · 39810.1016/j.diamond.2004.11.019 ↗
19. Pangarov · Electrochim. Acta. · 1962 · 11 · 171910.1016/0013-4686(66)80085-3 ↗
20. Chen · J. Inorg. Mater. · 2007 · 22 · 287
21. Family · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1988 · 61 · 42810.1103/PhysRevLett.61.428 ↗