Interfacial Anode Kinetics and Its Influence on Cycling Performance of Sulfide Solid-State Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Solid-state batteries (SSBs) are primarily tested in two-electrode and/or symmetric cell configurations, which may lead to under- or overestimation of degradation and failure. For long-term cycling and under dynamic conditions, the contribution of the counter electrode (anode) to fading may be substantial but is rarely reported due to lack of suitable characterization techniques. Here, we employed an advanced three-electrode cell setup to elucidate the overpotential growth and interface-related kinetic response for commonly used counter electrodes in lab-scale testing, namely, Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 and In/InLi, as well as for LiNbO 3 -coated LiNi 0.85 Co 0.10 Mn 0.05 O 2 as the working electrode (cathode) in thiophosphate-based SSB cells. This was achieved through continuous monitoring of individual electrode potentials (>1500 h) and by performing electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements in situ in combination with distribution of relaxation times analysis. The results reveal distinct differences in polarization and interfacial kinetics between the Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 and In/InLi anodes in practical application scenarios and how these affect cyclability and the analysis of capacity fading.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Battery and Electrochemistry Laboratory (BELLA), Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
BASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Str. 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
Institute of Physical Chemistry & Center for Materials Research (ZfM/LaMa), Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 17, 35392 Giessen, Germany
Funding
BASF
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.3010.1038/nenergy.2016.30 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0246010.1021/acsenergylett.4c02460 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41578-019-0165-510.1038/s41578-019-0165-5 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20200268910.1002/aenm.202002689 ↗
5. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41560-023-01208-910.1038/s41560-023-01208-9 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0010110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.303338810.1149/1.3033388 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41560-024-01634-310.1038/s41560-024-01634-3 ↗
10. 10.1002/batt.20180014910.1002/batt.201800149 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0227410.1021/acsenergylett.3c02274 ↗
12. 10.1021/acselectrochem.4c0006010.1021/acselectrochem.4c00060 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20240405510.1002/aenm.202404055 ↗
14. 10.1149/1945-7111/ad259410.1149/1945-7111/ad2594 ↗
15. 10.1039/C7TA02730C10.1039/C7TA02730C ↗
16. 10.1088/2752-5724/ac389710.1088/2752-5724/ac3897 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20230264310.1002/aenm.202302643 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ensm.2025.10400010.1016/j.ensm.2025.104000 ↗
19. 10.1126/sciadv.abi552010.1126/sciadv.abi5520 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.3c1316010.1021/acsami.3c13160 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.11053110.1016/j.nanoen.2024.110531 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.est.2024.11343510.1016/j.est.2024.113435 ↗
23. 10.1149/1945-7111/accb6f10.1149/1945-7111/accb6f ↗
24. 10.1039/C8TA03450H10.1039/C8TA03450H ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20190256810.1002/aenm.201902568 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41563-025-02198-710.1038/s41563-025-02198-7 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0091510.1021/acsenergylett.4c00915 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20241500610.1002/adma.202415006 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsaem.3c0165610.1021/acsaem.3c01656 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.00510.1016/j.joule.2022.05.005 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c0030110.1021/acs.chemmater.4c00301 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.esci.2022.10008710.1016/j.esci.2022.100087 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41586-024-08298-910.1038/s41586-024-08298-9 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matt.2025.10213510.1016/j.matt.2025.102135 ↗
35. 10.1002/admi.20220180610.1002/admi.202201806 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10046510.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100465 ↗